Innovative 3D NAND and cutting-edge controller technology, with read and write performance up to 3400/3000MB/s, pushing the limits of PCIe Gen 3 NVMe for tech enthusiasts, professional designers, and serious gamers
Capable of enhancing data security and management with rapid, full-drive encryption, helping protect your data without performance degradation
Optimize performance and durability with dynamic write acceleration, error correction, and adaptive thermal protection
Operating systems open almost instantly, apps launch in seconds, and games load before you're ready to spawn
Backed by a limited 5-year warranty or up to the max endurance rating of 1200 TBW
Community Notes
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Innovative 3D NAND and cutting-edge controller technology, with read and write performance up to 3400/3000MB/s, pushing the limits of PCIe Gen 3 NVMe for tech enthusiasts, professional designers, and serious gamers
Capable of enhancing data security and management with rapid, full-drive encryption, helping protect your data without performance degradation
Optimize performance and durability with dynamic write acceleration, error correction, and adaptive thermal protection
Operating systems open almost instantly, apps launch in seconds, and games load before you're ready to spawn
Backed by a limited 5-year warranty or up to the max endurance rating of 1200 TBW
Looks like the Crucial has 70gb MLC, vs 50GB for Kingston, but Kingston has slightly higher sustained writes past cache.
for my use case I went with crucial as slightly large cache exceeds most of my camera card sizes, which will be my biggest transfers, and slightly higher writes from 15gb of movie files benchmark https://www.tomshardware.com/revi...d-review/2 https://www.tomshardware.com/revi...d-review/2
Last edited by slvrscoobie April 11, 2022 at 07:10 PM.
Kingston - KC2500 - 2TB - $167
Samsung 970 Evo Plus - 2TB - $200
Based mostly on reputation, I'd go with Samsung for reliable qa, firmware and drivers. The 970 evo plus regularly goes down to $179 and then you can often find a cashback website that gives another 3-10%.
Based mostly on reputation, I'd go with Samsung for reliable qa, firmware and drivers. The 970 evo plus regularly goes down to $179 and then you can often find a cashback website that gives another 3-10%.
I think all these companies have a good reputation. I say good because no brand is perfect. I don't think Samsung has the greatest QA. When it comes pure advancement in technology, they have the power and resources to be first in the market for most things.
I think all these companies have a good reputation. I say good because no brand is perfect. I don't think Samsung has the greatest QA. When it comes pure advancement in technology, they have the power and resources to be first in the market for most things.
My knowledge is based single-handedly on recommendation from a former WD SSD engineer. According to him WD testing facilities is second to none and believes Samsung has proven themselves over the years. Basically it comes down to testing since a lot of the chips are sourced from the same source and where they differ is the firmware and driver and that's why testing is crucial. E.g. what happens if you lose power, what happens to data in DRAM? A good firmware would know to read DRAM upon boot up and look into storing missing data, a bad would not.
Anyway, to each their own of course, I'm sure there's plenty of people who will find any SSD perfectly fine but I'd personally go for WD or Samsung. He did mention SK Hynix and Seagate as good alternatives.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
9 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
This OR:
Kingston - KC2500 - 2TB - $167
Samsung 970 Evo Plus - 2TB - $200
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank jtree1
This OR:
Kingston - KC2500 - 2TB - $167
Samsung 970 Evo Plus - 2TB - $200
VS
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
Looks like the Crucial has 70gb MLC, vs 50GB for Kingston, but Kingston has slightly higher sustained writes past cache.
for my use case I went with crucial as slightly large cache exceeds most of my camera card sizes, which will be my biggest transfers, and slightly higher writes from 15gb of movie files benchmark
https://www.tomshardwar
https://www.tomshardwar
This OR:
Kingston - KC2500 - 2TB - $167
Samsung 970 Evo Plus - 2TB - $200
Anyway, to each their own of course, I'm sure there's plenty of people who will find any SSD perfectly fine but I'd personally go for WD or Samsung. He did mention SK Hynix and Seagate as good alternatives.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!