Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
Select Target Stores:1-oz Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion (SPF 70) Expired
Free
(In-Store Only w/ Target Circle Coupon)
Select Target Stores have 1-oz Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion (SPF 70) on sale for $1.99 - $2 Off Manufacturer Target Circle Coupon [Free to Join] valid for in-store purchase only.
- Note: Availability/pricing may vary by stores; may not be available in all areas. Must login to your Target account to save this offer to utilize it for in-store purchase only.
Original Post
Written by
Edited July 4, 2022
at 11:22 PM
Target has Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion - SPF 70 (1 fl oz) for Free after "clipping" $2 off coupon. Valid In-Store Only.
https://www.target.com/p/neutroge...A-80839020
https://www.target.com/p/neutroge...A-80839020
in
Skin Care
(5)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Skin Care Deals
View AllFrontpage
$6.40
w/ Subscribe & Save
20
4
Frontpage
$12.35
w/ Subscribe & Save
22
14
Frontpage
Price Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion - SPF 70 - 1 fl oz
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
49 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank cannono
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
EWG is not credible - they are funded with the purpose of driving sales to pseudo-scientific marketed brands, using fear tactics and often suggesting you be afraid to buy from brands without conclusive reasoning.
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
This sunscreen will probably be made per the fda recommendations of safe levels. That is set by the org and expert panelist, they may have harmonized but this will be sold at whatever level they have deemed appropriate or less.
Oxybenzone is worth avoiding, too. Better to buy sunscreens with physical blocks, rather than chemical blocks.
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
Skeptoid eh? The wiki link is weak with hardly any information. I gave up before third one. This sounds like some q anon conspiracy stuff tbh…… i don't doubt that certain levels are bad. But this proves noth
I encouraged doing your own search - there are actual credible organization that rebuke EWG, and I gave just a few places you can start with that cite resources to review. Wiki alone is not meant to be a source, but a starting point - use it if you wish.
Certain levels of anything are bad. EWG preys on people's fear in order to forward their paying clients' messaging. The product in this deal is safe according to current scientific consensus and EWG is not a credible source to refute the safety.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank tomeaine
The recall was for the aerosol version
Better than all of our coral reefs dying off. There's a reason these sunscreens are about to be banned in Hawaii.
Too late for that...they all whitewashed anyway
This sunscreen will probably be made per the fda recommendations of safe levels. That is set by the org and expert panelist, they may have harmonized but this will be sold at whatever level they have deemed appropriate or less.
Part of the decision-making process is that any sunscreen helps prevent skin cancer. But the FDA does not require a direct risk/benefit comparison of physical block vs. chemical block sunscreens, with backup research studies of both options based on actual use. However, there is plenty of other evidence out there that physical block sunscreens are the much better option.
Part of the decision-making process is that any sunscreen helps prevent skin cancer. But the FDA does not require a direct risk/benefit comparison of physical block vs. chemical block sunscreens, with backup research studies of both options based on actual use. However, there is plenty of other evidence out there that physical block sunscreens are the much better option.
No thanks. Now I stick with a known brand like Banana Boat
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.