Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
09/22/23 | Newegg | $28 |
1 |
07/28/23 | Newegg | $28 |
2 |
07/19/23 | Newegg | $28 |
8 |
06/14/23 | Newegg | $27.99 |
0 |
03/17/23 | Newegg | $27.99 popular |
51 |
02/20/23 | Amazon | $28.99 |
6 |
02/09/23 | Newegg | $28 frontpage |
95 |
10/05/22 | Newegg | $32 |
0 |
09/17/22 | Amazon | $33.62 |
0 |
05/31/22 | Amazon | $29.62 |
8 |
02/23/22 | eBay | $75 frontpage |
79 |
02/21/22 | Amazon | $29.99 |
26 |
01/19/22 | Amazon | $33.99 |
4 |
11/22/21 | Amazon | $30 |
29 |
08/03/21 | Amazon | $33.99 |
7 |
06/30/21 | Amazon | $30 frontpage |
82 |
06/17/21 | Amazon | $30 frontpage |
96 |
02/22/21 | Amazon | $30 frontpage |
154 |
01/20/21 | Amazon | $33.99 popular |
33 |
12/07/20 | Amazon | $33.99 |
0 |
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Amazon | $42.99 |
Product Name: | eufy security Solo IndoorCam C24, 2K Security Indoor Camera, Plug-in Camera with Wi-Fi, IP Camera, Human & Pet AI, Voice Assistant Compatibility, Night Vision, Two-Way Audio, HomeBase not Compatible |
Manufacturer: | Eufy |
Model Number: | T84001W1 |
Product SKU: | B08571VZ3Q |
UPC: | 194644181208 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
11 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank HapShaughnessy
"At this point, there's zero chance I would buy a Eufy security camera for my own home. But if you already own some or if you're on the fence, you might want to hear what the company has to say for itself."
https://www.theverge.co
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank im14abeer
You may not care, but many people invested in the Eufy ecosystem entirely because of their "no cloud" claims. What Anker did, that they're now trying to pass off as a misunderstanding on the consumer's part, was intentional. This is completely unacceptable for any product, but egregious abuse of trust for a security product. Remember, this isn't just a few affected outside facing doorbell cameras with a bug, people have these in their homes. Their marketing intended to deceive and garnered them sales they couldn't have made without the lies. What's harder to understand than the angry mob with pitchforks, at least to me, is corporate fanboys who will defend companies when they're caught being bad actors. This isn't your neighbor who screwed up but deep down you know is a good guy, it's a Chinese corporation that would bulldoze your house tomorrow if it stood in the way of profits.
---E
Edited to add...
If the face ID claims have merit, I can't wait to see the contortions people will do to try and justify Anker's behaviour.
---E
Eufy. Hard pass
"At this point, there's zero chance I would buy a Eufy security camera for my own home. But if you already own some or if you're on the fence, you might want to hear what the company has to say for itself."
https://www.theverge.co
This cam works reasonably well for my use case, and it's a decent price.
While I think Eufy should be fully transparent about potential privacy issues with their implementation, consumers should have the option to make choices per their risk tolerance. I'm not thrilled about the loss of functionality apparently related to how some have reacted to this issue.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
You may not care, but many people invested in the Eufy ecosystem entirely because of their "no cloud" claims. What Anker did, that they're now trying to pass off as a misunderstanding on the consumer's part, was intentional. This is completely unacceptable for any product, but egregious abuse of trust for a security product. Remember, this isn't just a few affected outside facing doorbell cameras with a bug, people have these in their homes. Their marketing intended to deceive and garnered them sales they couldn't have made without the lies. What's harder to understand than the angry mob with pitchforks, at least to me, is corporate fanboys who will defend companies when they're caught being bad actors. This isn't your neighbor who screwed up but deep down you know is a good guy, it's a Chinese corporation that would bulldoze your house tomorrow if it stood in the way of profits.
---E
Edited to add...
If the face ID claims have merit, I can't wait to see the contortions people will do to try and justify Anker's behaviour.
---E
You truly believe all the electronics you own respect your privacy Lmao what world do you live in start with throwing away your cellphone and cancelling your internet service provider
This cam works reasonably well for my use case, and it's a decent price.
While I think Eufy should be fully transparent about potential privacy issues with their implementation, consumers should have the option to make choices per their risk tolerance. I'm not thrilled about the loss of functionality apparently related to how some have reacted to this issue.
Thanks for the laugh.
Throw away all your Eufy cameras right now: AndroidCentral
https://www.androidcent
We're warning that Eufy users should remove all Eufy cameras they have set up on their premises.
Thanks for the laugh.
Throw away all your Eufy cameras right now: AndroidCentral
https://www.androidcent
We're warning that Eufy users should remove all Eufy cameras they have set up on their premises.