Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
expired
SehoneyDP 3.5K Views
May 5, 2023 7:10 AM

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6 Graphics Card w/ The Last of Us Game Bundle $950 + Free Shipping

$950

$1,000

5% off
Newegg
Visit Newegg

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
8Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Newegg [newegg.com] has SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6 Graphics Card w/ The Last of Us Game Bundle on sale for $999 - $50 off when you apply promo code SSCS528 at checkout = $949.99. Shipping is free.
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Newegg [newegg.com] has SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB GDDR6 Graphics Card w/ The Last of Us Game Bundle on sale for $999 - $50 off when you apply promo code SSCS528 at checkout = $949.99. Shipping is free.

Community Voting

Deal Score
+11
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

8 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

May 5, 2023 7:22 PM
43 Comments
Joined Dec 2016
MaverickDMay 5, 2023 7:22 PM
43 Comments
AMD you drive a hard bargain. I'll give you three fiddy take it or leave it
2
2
May 5, 2023 8:27 PM
538 Comments
Joined May 2016
williewcMay 5, 2023 8:27 PM
538 Comments
Anyone thinking of jumping on this should pay the extra $100 and get the Nitro+ version. Far better cooling and look.
3
May 5, 2023 8:54 PM
35 Comments
Joined Jan 2017
TimmyTimmyTimmyTimeMay 5, 2023 8:54 PM
35 Comments
Hold the line!!!
1
May 5, 2023 9:04 PM
1.1K Comments
Joined Nov 2020
ElatedSpaniel543May 5, 2023 9:04 PM
1.1K Comments
Quote from williewc View quoted comment :
Anyone thinking of jumping on this should pay the extra $100 and get the Nitro+ version. Far better cooling and look.
I personally don't care what it looks like, so does that cooling equal $100 (e.g.~10%) better performance? My last sapphire card was a pulse and it's been rock solid for three years, so I'm not sure if there's any longevity considerations.
May 5, 2023 9:49 PM
2.2K Comments
Joined Jul 2008
sandwichMay 5, 2023 9:49 PM
2.2K Comments
Quote from williewc View quoted comment :
Anyone thinking of jumping on this should pay the extra $100 and get the Nitro+ version. Far better cooling and look.
The first party AMD cooler works just fine in a case with good airflow... unless you have the defective vapor chamber that doesn't have enough water. I don't think a 3 slot cooler is generally required for this card.

That said it does need airflow on the backplate which the bigger card might solve.
May 5, 2023 11:21 PM
109 Comments
Joined Dec 2014
TillmanAMay 5, 2023 11:21 PM
109 Comments
Quote from MaverickD View quoted comment :
AMD you drive a hard bargain. I'll give you three fiddy take it or leave it
Dam Lockness Monster.
May 5, 2023 11:31 PM
538 Comments
Joined May 2016
williewcMay 5, 2023 11:31 PM
538 Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

Quote from ElatedSpaniel543 View quoted comment :
I personally don't care what it looks like, so does that cooling equal $100 (e.g.~10%) better performance? My last sapphire card was a pulse and it's been rock solid for three years, so I'm not sure if there's any longevity considerations.
quote from Toms Hardware when they reviewed it. To me and alot of other people this is worth the extra $100. The Nitro+ is always the best version made for AMD gpus, thats not an opinion as reviews will back it up. But its only 7% faster at 4k than the reference, not quite your 10%

"The clock speeds help to explain the higher power draw, as, in FurMark, Sapphire's card averaged just over 2 GHz, compared to 1.66 GHz on the reference model. While gaming, it also averaged 2.8 GHz compared to 2.56 GHz on the reference card.

We don't usually dig too much into the voltages, but it's worth mentioning that in our Metro testing, the reference card had an average VDDC of 0.895V while under load, compared to the Sapphire card's 0.988V for the same test sequence. That extra 0.93V makes a rather large difference in power use when combined with the higher clock speeds.

The good news is that temperatures are basically the same on the Sapphire card and on the reference XTX, despite the higher power draw. Both top out in the 65C range, with the reference XTX running its fans at up to ~1650 RPM compared to just 1450 RPM for the Sapphire card. That impacts the noise level as well.

We check noise levels using an SPL (sound pressure level) meter placed 10cm from the card, with the mic aimed right at the center fan. This helps minimize the impact of other noise sources like the fans on the CPU cooler. The noise floor of our test environment and equipment is around 32 dB(A).

After running Metro for over 15 minutes, the Sapphire RX 7900 XTX settled in at a fan speed of 38% and a noise level of 42.2 dB(A). That's only slightly higher than some of the quietest cards we've tested, which land at around 39 dB(A). The reference card meanwhile measured 49.9 dB(A), which is clearly audible over the ambient room noise. We also tested with a static fan speed of 75%, where the Sapphire generated 56.6 dB(A) of noise, so there's plenty of room for additional airflow and cooling if the fans need to ramp up — not that you'd normally want that."
Last edited by williewc May 5, 2023 at 04:36 PM.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

May 6, 2023 3:23 PM
1.1K Comments
Joined Nov 2020
ElatedSpaniel543May 6, 2023 3:23 PM
1.1K Comments
Quote from williewc View quoted comment :
quote from Toms Hardware when they reviewed it. To me and alot of other people this is worth the extra $100. The Nitro+ is always the best version made for AMD gpus, thats not an opinion as reviews will back it up. But its only 7% faster at 4k than the reference, not quite your 10%

"The clock speeds help to explain the higher power draw, as, in FurMark, Sapphire's card averaged just over 2 GHz, compared to 1.66 GHz on the reference model. While gaming, it also averaged 2.8 GHz compared to 2.56 GHz on the reference card.

We don't usually dig too much into the voltages, but it's worth mentioning that in our Metro testing, the reference card had an average VDDC of 0.895V while under load, compared to the Sapphire card's 0.988V for the same test sequence. That extra 0.93V makes a rather large difference in power use when combined with the higher clock speeds.

The good news is that temperatures are basically the same on the Sapphire card and on the reference XTX, despite the higher power draw. Both top out in the 65C range, with the reference XTX running its fans at up to ~1650 RPM compared to just 1450 RPM for the Sapphire card. That impacts the noise level as well.

We check noise levels using an SPL (sound pressure level) meter placed 10cm from the card, with the mic aimed right at the center fan. This helps minimize the impact of other noise sources like the fans on the CPU cooler. The noise floor of our test environment and equipment is around 32 dB(A).

After running Metro for over 15 minutes, the Sapphire RX 7900 XTX settled in at a fan speed of 38% and a noise level of 42.2 dB(A). That's only slightly higher than some of the quietest cards we've tested, which land at around 39 dB(A). The reference card meanwhile measured 49.9 dB(A), which is clearly audible over the ambient room noise. We also tested with a static fan speed of 75%, where the Sapphire generated 56.6 dB(A) of noise, so there's plenty of room for additional airflow and cooling if the fans need to ramp up — not that you'd normally want that."
7% is pretty impressive. As is the low noise review. I can see how that would be worth an extra $100.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!