Eyedictive[eyedictive.com] has Zeiss Polarized Titanium Navigator Sunglasses NLA for $64 - $25 w/ code TSTWD3JH25= $39. Shipping is free. Also available $39 w/ code TSTWD3JH25:
Define "fake" when every single recognizable sunglass brand is owned by the same monopoly, pumped out of the same shitty factories in China for $1.50, then upcharged hundreds of dollars to brand obsessed chumps?
The same shit materials they use in the "real" products.
None of those BS brands make their own sunglasses, they contract with Luxottica, or they're just a fake shell brand wholly owned by Luxottica to continue perpetrating the farce of a competitive market, to brand an ODM design with minimal tweaks, find a stupid gimmick material to incorporate like Titanium or carbon fiber, use the absolute cheapest manufacturing process and materials sourcing possible, then pump them out by the thousands using child labor.
Don't for one second think that in overpaying for "Ray-Bans" or "Dolce & Cabbana", that a single one of their employees ever touched your glasses.
The entire industry is a corrupt, monopoly owned garbage fire. You may as well buy the $18 crap unbranded generic Chinese knockoffs with the unpronouncable names that flood Amazon.
For what it's worth, I have purchased 6 pairs of Serengeti's from eyedictive and never had any issues or concerns with quality. Do I actually believe most name-brand sunglasses are really worth their retail $300+ price? No, but I've been happy many times over with $30-50 pairs from this site.
In for 1, not that I need them…
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
If you're looking for a pair <$100 sunnies, check out Knockaround, Shady Rays, or Goodr. I generally think of them as stylish, cheap enough to buy a few to have lying around, and I don't have a panic attack if I lose a pair. Shady Rays especially has a Lost & Broken program that I've used a few times where they'll send you a replacement pair for like $10.
Re: Knockaround sunglasses. I liked my pair until a very small amount of rain completely destroyed the mirror coating on the lenses. Read a lot of reviews after that confirmed it's a recurring problem for them (pretty egregious if you ask me)
so which brand do you recommend that is not luxotica and has good quality and cost less then 300$? amazon 20-30$ chinese glasses are garbage quality
Of you have a Costco membership, they often have Maui Jim's for $100-150. I bought a titanium pair last year and have been very happy with them; super lightweight and comfortable.
Re: Knockaround sunglasses. I liked my pair until a very small amount of rain completely destroyed the mirror coating on the lenses. Read a lot of reviews after that confirmed it's a recurring problem for them (pretty egregious if you ask me)
Weird. Not saying that didn't happen to you but I've had multiple pairs that I've abused and been pretty happy with the quality. Worn 'em out in the weather, in the pool, in the ocean, etc.
33 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
None of those BS brands make their own sunglasses, they contract with Luxottica, or they're just a fake shell brand wholly owned by Luxottica to continue perpetrating the farce of a competitive market, to brand an ODM design with minimal tweaks, find a stupid gimmick material to incorporate like Titanium or carbon fiber, use the absolute cheapest manufacturing process and materials sourcing possible, then pump them out by the thousands using child labor.
Don't for one second think that in overpaying for "Ray-Bans" or "Dolce & Cabbana", that a single one of their employees ever touched your glasses.
The entire industry is a corrupt, monopoly owned garbage fire. You may as well buy the $18 crap unbranded generic Chinese knockoffs with the unpronouncable names that flood Amazon.
In for 1, not that I need them…
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Re: Knockaround sunglasses. I liked my pair until a very small amount of rain completely destroyed the mirror coating on the lenses. Read a lot of reviews after that confirmed it's a recurring problem for them (pretty egregious if you ask me)
Sorry, Mr Kong.