goHardDrive via Newegg has 10TB HGST WD Ultrastar DC HC510 3.5" SATA 7200RPM Hard Drive (Refurbished, HUH721010ALE601) on sale for $79.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member sr71 for sharing this deal.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
goHardDrive via Newegg has 10TB HGST WD Ultrastar DC HC510 3.5" SATA 7200RPM Hard Drive (Refurbished, HUH721010ALE601) on sale for $79.99. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Community Member sr71 for sharing this deal.
For those who are interested: BackBlaze (excellent remote backup company) publishes regular statistical reports on the reliability of drives they have in service. Because they often have thousands of a given hard drive model in service, often for years, it's probably the most realistic set of data on HDD brand/model reliability available anywhere.
Western Digital's failure rates are astoundingly low.
My refurbished HGST 3GB and 4GB drives have run in Unraid for nearly a decade now. Finally replacing with higher sizes. At $35 a drive, they were a bargain.
In the same boat. I have 2TB and 3TB refurbished HGST Ultrastar drives as my main drive in a couple systems for several years without a problem. I just upgraded to a 14TB Ultrastar. This drive is LOUD though...right-side up. After flipping it over it is way quieter.
In the same boat. I have 2TB and 3TB refurbished HGST Ultrastar drives as my main drive in a couple systems for several years without a problem. I just upgraded to a 14TB Ultrastar. This drive is LOUD though...right-side up. After flipping it over it is way quieter.
I have a bunch of HGST 3TB and 4TB that are retired data center drives. They are now old drives. They have been very reliable. The lower RPM versions run much cooler.
I also have at least 4 of the WD 2TB Black drives from 2011. They just won't die. They just sit here with movies on them .
I can tell you from firsthand experience that bad shipping can kill any hard drive. I had an idiot ebay seller ship a box of drives a few years ago with no padding. Just stacked in a box. All of the drives along one edge were dead from bad cushioning.
I have an old TrueNAS server full of 4TB WD Red drives. Wouldn't mind upgrading.
Does anyone have any experience with the 10TB or the 12TB linked above? Any issues with them? Did you have any fail?
I bought 3 of these drives from this vendor , but on Amazon. The 3 drives had relatively low hours on them. I let them run in fit a few days before trying to create a pool. After 1-2 days, one of the drives could no longer be seen by the OS or Bios. After swapping the cables around and confirming there were no issues with power or the SATA interface, I sent a message to the vendor about the dead drive, and they responded and shipped me a replacement right away with no hassle at all and I shipped the defect back with their provided shipping.
No problems with the replacement drive.
I have since bought 2 more of these drives, so now I'm running 5 drives, 3 storage with 2 parity.
As others have said, Enterprise drives are much more durable and have a longer life than consumer gear drives, and for the storage to price ratio, these drives are great.
One last thing is that you may need to use the included power adapter cable in order for the drive to power on and spin up.
I did not have to use this as I plugged them directly into the backplane in my NAS case, and they just worked.
You may have heard it differently that me. I've heard it in such a way that you can have one drive/array blow up, and you still have 2 copies of your data. Taken from Backblaze[backblaze.com]:
Not sure why you quoted something that backs up my statement... 2 copies of your data on different media
Specifically when it talks about "media" it means physical media types (optical, magnetic tape, magnetic tray, solid state). The reason is that optical media wont get destroyed by the same means as magnetic media, so if something happens that destroys magnetic media, you still have your data.
What you are claiming is basically a Raid 1 array would count as 2 of the 3 copies of data (since Raid 1 arrays are mirrored). That isn't what it means.
What drive test programs do you guys use to test a used drive when you buy one? I know some do the surface test that can take a huge amount of time to complete on even a 4TB drive
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
What drive test programs do you guys use to test a used drive when you buy one? I know some do the surface test that can take a huge amount of time to complete on even a 4TB drive
Any thorough test is going to take time. As the drives get bigger but not all that much faster, the tests take even longer (days). There's no getting around this unless you just do a basic test like SMART and YOLO it.
Most of us are doing a surface scan and/or basic read/write so that's going to be badblocks, unRaid preclear, smartmontools extended test, WD Data Lifeguard extended, fio, StableBit Scanner surface scan, etc.
The answer is also going to depend on the environment (OS) that you're using.
What drive test programs do you guys use to test a used drive when you buy one? I know some do the surface test that can take a huge amount of time to complete on even a 4TB drive
Specifically when it talks about "media" it means physical media types (optical, magnetic tape, magnetic tray, solid state). The reason is that optical media wont get destroyed by the same means as magnetic media, so if something happens that destroys magnetic media, you still have your data.
What you are claiming is basically a Raid 1 array would count as 2 of the 3 copies of data (since Raid 1 arrays are mirrored). That isn't what it means.
Nope. What I said is that if your array blows up, you still have 2 copies. You might see things differently, but to me "blowing up" means the whole thing is gone. When I said "drive/array" I didn't mean one drive in your array. I meant either one drive, like a single external drive, or array, which is a group of disks. Both count as just "1" copy.
My link from Backblaze said:
Quote
:
You may have heard of the 3-2-1 backup strategy. It means having at least three copies of your data, two local (on-site) but on different media (read: devices), and at least one copy off-site.
We'll use "socialsecurity.jpg" as an example for this scenario. Socialsecurity.jpg lives on your computer at home; let's say you took a picture of it for your tax accountant years ago for some tax-related stuff (as tax accountants are wont to do). That's one copy of the data.
You also have an external hard drive to back up your computer; if you're on a Mac, you might use it as a Time Machine drive (and Backblaze loves Time Machine). That external hard drive will back up socialsecurity.jpg as part of its backup process. That's a second copy on a different device or medium.
In addition to that external hard drive, you also have an online backup solution (we recommend Backblaze, go figure!). The online backup continuously scans your computer and uploads your data to an off-site data center. Socialsecurity.jpg is included in this upload, becoming the third copy of your data.
Can you really read that and tell me that my I'm wrong? Backblaze says "2 devices". And then it gives an example of the computer's internal drive, an external drive, and an offsite backup.
FYI, I fully agree that having data on 2+ different types of media is even better. But for home users, it's probably not worth the cost, time, or effort. The Seagate link you shared was aimed at large organizations. My Backblaze link was aimed at home users. I think it's fair to consider how 3-2-1 could apply differently to different scenarios.
Last edited by zyberwoof February 20, 2024 at 11:40 AM.
Nope. What I said is that if your array blows up, you still have 2 copies. You might see things differently, but to me "blowing up" means the whole thing is gone. When I said "drive/array" I didn't mean one drive in your array. I meant either one drive, like a single external drive, or array, which is a group of disks. Both count as just "1" copy.
My link from Backblaze said:
Can you really read that and tell me that my I'm wrong? Backblaze says "2 devices". And then it gives an example of the computer's internal drive, an external drive, and an offsite backup.
FYI, I fully agree that having data on 2+ different types of media is even better. But for home users, it's probably not worth the cost, time, or effort. The Seagate link you shared was aimed at large organizations. My Backblaze link was aimed at home users. I think it's fair to consider how 3-2-1 could apply differently to different scenarios.
We're into the weeds on this but let me say that traditionally, 3-2-1 and different types of "media" didn't just mean different HDDs, with all due respect to BB.
Different media means exactly that, a different TYPE of storage technology. Traditionally that meant tape, but you could substitute optical media or even arguably cloud storage these days.
3-2-1 is ideal but one doesn't necessarily NEED to use that for all your backups, just critical data.
Most homes have a mix of stuff they absolutely don't want to lose (pictures, records, etc) and those should at least be on a cold storage drive somewhere else, on a backup (array), and at least in the cloud somewhere. If you can also do optical, that's great and gets you arguably beyond 3-2-1 IMO.
For all other stuff like VM data, game saves, and other stuff that would stink to lose but it's not the end of the world, 2 backup copies being on drives (1 on site and one elsewhere) isn't the end of the world IMO.
But I'd tend to agree that BackBlaze isn't right in saying different devices necessarily constitute different media. SSDs vs HDDs..... maybe. And cloud is a slippery slope, but different media has normally meant tape vs optical vs HDD etc. Different media types ensures your data will be more likely to survive and be able to be successfully restored as tech marches on.
Last edited by lastwraith February 20, 2024 at 12:13 PM.
I have several and smart helium level never budges, so either it's stable or it's wrong. Either case there doesnt seem to be any studies on this so the warning is based on nothing.
The Carnegie Mellon study examined large production systems, including high-performance computing sites and Internet services sites running SCSI, FC and SATA drives. The data sheets for those drives listed MTBF between 1 million to 1.5 million hours, which the study said should mean annual failure rates "of at most 0.88%." However, the study showed typical annual replacement rates of between 2% and 4%, "and up to 13% observed on some systems."
This is like buying a used car with 40-50k miles on it, but you're using the few samples that can go a million miles (like Matt Farrah's Lexus) to claim that the typical 40-50k mile car still have 950k mile life left.
Last edited by awdrifter February 21, 2024 at 02:43 AM.
This is like buying a used car with 40-50k miles on it, but you're using the few samples that can go a million miles (like Matt Farrah's Lexus) to claim that the typical 40-50k mile car still have 950k mile life left.
I'm getting the 12TB drive on newegg. I was considering putting it into an external drive case I already have ( no fan), but I bet I would need a case with a fan. I'm thinking the heat would kill it.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
This is like buying a used car with 40-50k miles on it, but you're using the few samples that can go a million miles (like Matt Farrah's Lexus) to claim that the typical 40-50k mile car still have 950k mile life left.
The last published BackBlaze report (which we all love to point to for everything) shows that WD helium drives are amongst the most reliable drives they have. So I'm not sure where you're going with that one.
You're assuming much for a technology that has now been around for years with no real issues yet.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
https://www.newegg.com/p/1Z4-001J-00E07
Western Digital's failure rates are astoundingly low.
https://www.backblaze.c
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
117 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I also have at least 4 of the WD 2TB Black drives from 2011. They just won't die. They just sit here with movies on them .
I can tell you from firsthand experience that bad shipping can kill any hard drive. I had an idiot ebay seller ship a box of drives a few years ago with no padding. Just stacked in a box. All of the drives along one edge were dead from bad cushioning.
Does anyone have any experience with the 10TB or the 12TB linked above? Any issues with them? Did you have any fail?
No problems with the replacement drive.
I have since bought 2 more of these drives, so now I'm running 5 drives, 3 storage with 2 parity.
As others have said, Enterprise drives are much more durable and have a longer life than consumer gear drives, and for the storage to price ratio, these drives are great.
One last thing is that you may need to use the included power adapter cable in order for the drive to power on and spin up.
I did not have to use this as I plugged them directly into the backplane in my NAS case, and they just worked.
https://www.seagate.com/blog/what...-strategy/
Specifically when it talks about "media" it means physical media types (optical, magnetic tape, magnetic tray, solid state). The reason is that optical media wont get destroyed by the same means as magnetic media, so if something happens that destroys magnetic media, you still have your data.
What you are claiming is basically a Raid 1 array would count as 2 of the 3 copies of data (since Raid 1 arrays are mirrored). That isn't what it means.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Most of us are doing a surface scan and/or basic read/write so that's going to be badblocks, unRaid preclear, smartmontools extended test, WD Data Lifeguard extended, fio, StableBit Scanner surface scan, etc.
The answer is also going to depend on the environment (OS) that you're using.
https://panthema.net/2013/disk-filltest/
Check crystaldiskinfo if bad cluster count increases. It will take as long as it takes, but that's the only way to test for sure.
https://www.seagate.com/blog/what...-strategy/ [seagate.com]
Specifically when it talks about "media" it means physical media types (optical, magnetic tape, magnetic tray, solid state). The reason is that optical media wont get destroyed by the same means as magnetic media, so if something happens that destroys magnetic media, you still have your data.
What you are claiming is basically a Raid 1 array would count as 2 of the 3 copies of data (since Raid 1 arrays are mirrored). That isn't what it means.
My link from Backblaze said:
We'll use "socialsecurity.jpg" as an example for this scenario. Socialsecurity.jpg lives on your computer at home; let's say you took a picture of it for your tax accountant years ago for some tax-related stuff (as tax accountants are wont to do). That's one copy of the data.
You also have an external hard drive to back up your computer; if you're on a Mac, you might use it as a Time Machine drive (and Backblaze loves Time Machine). That external hard drive will back up socialsecurity.jpg as part of its backup process. That's a second copy on a different device or medium.
In addition to that external hard drive, you also have an online backup solution (we recommend Backblaze, go figure!). The online backup continuously scans your computer and uploads your data to an off-site data center. Socialsecurity.jpg is included in this upload, becoming the third copy of your data.
FYI, I fully agree that having data on 2+ different types of media is even better. But for home users, it's probably not worth the cost, time, or effort. The Seagate link you shared was aimed at large organizations. My Backblaze link was aimed at home users. I think it's fair to consider how 3-2-1 could apply differently to different scenarios.
My link from Backblaze said:
Can you really read that and tell me that my I'm wrong? Backblaze says "2 devices". And then it gives an example of the computer's internal drive, an external drive, and an offsite backup.
FYI, I fully agree that having data on 2+ different types of media is even better. But for home users, it's probably not worth the cost, time, or effort. The Seagate link you shared was aimed at large organizations. My Backblaze link was aimed at home users. I think it's fair to consider how 3-2-1 could apply differently to different scenarios.
Different media means exactly that, a different TYPE of storage technology. Traditionally that meant tape, but you could substitute optical media or even arguably cloud storage these days.
3-2-1 is ideal but one doesn't necessarily NEED to use that for all your backups, just critical data.
Most homes have a mix of stuff they absolutely don't want to lose (pictures, records, etc) and those should at least be on a cold storage drive somewhere else, on a backup (array), and at least in the cloud somewhere. If you can also do optical, that's great and gets you arguably beyond 3-2-1 IMO.
For all other stuff like VM data, game saves, and other stuff that would stink to lose but it's not the end of the world, 2 backup copies being on drives (1 on site and one elsewhere) isn't the end of the world IMO.
But I'd tend to agree that BackBlaze isn't right in saying different devices necessarily constitute different media. SSDs vs HDDs..... maybe. And cloud is a slippery slope, but different media has normally meant tape vs optical vs HDD etc. Different media types ensures your data will be more likely to survive and be able to be successfully restored as tech marches on.
I have several and smart helium level never budges, so either it's stable or it's wrong. Either case there doesnt seem to be any studies on this so the warning is based on nothing.
https://drbackup.net/online-backu...ard-drive/
https://drbackup.net/online-backu...ard-drive/
This is like buying a used car with 40-50k miles on it, but you're using the few samples that can go a million miles (like Matt Farrah's Lexus) to claim that the typical 40-50k mile car still have 950k mile life left.
https://www.backblaze.c
There haven't been mass reports of drives failing due to smart helium drop as far as I know.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://drbackup.net/online-backu...ard-drive/
This is like buying a used car with 40-50k miles on it, but you're using the few samples that can go a million miles (like Matt Farrah's Lexus) to claim that the typical 40-50k mile car still have 950k mile life left.
You're assuming much for a technology that has now been around for years with no real issues yet.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!