Amazon has
ASUS TUF Gaming Dual Band WiFi 6 Router w/ Dual 2.5G Ports & AiMesh (TUF-AX6000) for
$139.99.
Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Hunter
phoinix for posting this deal.
Note: Usually ships within 1 to 2 months.
About this item:- Ultrafast WiFi 6 - Enjoy speeds up to 6000 Mbps and 4X network efficiency with OFDMA and 160 MHz channels.
- Fast & Stable Wired Gaming - Dedicated gaming port to prioritize connected gaming device.
- Easy Port Forwarding in 3 Steps - Open NAT makes port forwarding simple, eliminating frustrating and complicated manual configuration.
- Dual 2.5 Gbps Ports - Giving you flexible network port configuration
- Extendable Router with AIMesh – Create a flexible, seamless whole-home mesh network with AiMesh-compatible routers.
- Tested Durability and Stable Operation - TUF Gaming AX6000 is built to be durable and undergoes verified testing to ensure reliable, stable operation
Features:- Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
- Up to 5952 Mb/s Throughput
- 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz (Dual-Band)
- 6 x External Antennas
- 1 x 2.5G Ethernet LAN Port
- 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN Ports
- 1 x 2.5G Ethernet WAN Port
- Link Aggregation Support
- AiProtection Pro & VPN Security Features
- Aura Sync RGB Lighting
Top Comments
1) This router supports OpenWRT.
2) Major security flaw if you use the 2nd and/or 3rd guest networks and want isolation between guest and main networks. Seems to be a continuous issue across different ASUS routers. Even after selecting the option to have isolation it absolutely does not work correctly. The 2nd and 3rd guest networks do not get their own VLAN/subnet like the 1st guest network does and can still communicate with main network (although this isn't the main reason why the 1st network is isolated, it's due to the routing table rules).
You can manually fix this using the ebtables routing table but without something like OpenWRT you would need to fix it each time you modify/enable/disable the guest networks or reboot the router since it will default back to the original lack of correct routing rules.
The AX-86U Pro is better than this router in practically every category but it costs more.
AX86U Pro vs TUF-AX6000
Max speed
861+4804 vs 1148+4804
CPU
2.0 GHz quad-core vs 2.0 GHz quad-core
RAM
1GB vs 512MB
I think the AC68U will go down as one of the best home routers alongside the OG Linksys WRT54G.
44 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I agree that the AC68U is a reliable router that won't die.
I've noticed that I've been putting on IoT devices and was wondering if there is a consumer router that is decent in speed & range (maybe even have mesh capability) but has an easy to config firewall to segregate IoT network?
Or do I have to learn to VLAN on the core switch with AP for IoT? With work & stuff, I was looking for way out of that.
I've noticed that I've been putting on IoT devices and was wondering if there is a consumer router that is decent in speed & range (maybe even have mesh capability) but has an easy to config firewall to segregate IoT network?
Or do I have to learn to VLAN on the core switch with AP for IoT? With work & stuff, I was looking for way out of that.
If you're running Asus Merlin, you should have multiple guest networks available.
I had been running TP-Link 4 Omada EAP225 APs, an ER605 router, and an OC200 controller which is all business level equipment. It was pretty good but I was having quirky issues with the router. It wouldn't hold DHCP reservations properly. The OC200 was slooow. I ended up switching back to Asus routers and frankly I've had less issues overall. I never have to reboot them or anything. I have wired backhauls to each of the mesh routers.
It's pretty nice that you can mesh about any asus router with another one, regardless of their age. It makes incremental upgrades much easier.
If you're running Asus Merlin, you should have multiple guest networks available.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Thanks! I appreciate it!
You could also set up specific static routes or even a VPN for the managing device.
As long as the holes are being poked into the guest network and not into your primary LAN, it's relatively safe.
If you actually meant 45, then that's extremely slow even for tech that's over a decade old.
If you meant 450, then you're closer to what you're paying for, but still comparatively low for what's offered in this day and age.
How much is your plan?