Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
forum thread Posted by BlueRaccoon1085 • Last Sunday
forum thread Posted by BlueRaccoon1085 • Last Sunday

Son of God (HD Digital Movie) Buy $4.99 or Rent $3.99

$4.99

$9.99

50% off
Amazon
9 Comments 2,276 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Limited time offer. Terms apply.

77% liked this movie
Google users

In the Holy Land, the Roman occupation has produced a cauldron of oppression, anxiety and excessive taxes levied upon the Jewish people. Fearing the wrath of Roman governor Pontius Pilate (Greg Hicks), Jewish high priest Caiaphas (Adrian Schiller) tries to keep control of his people. That control is threatened when Jesus arrives in Jerusalem, performing miracles and spreading messages of love and hope. Those who fear that Jesus will inspire a revolution decide that he must die.

Release date: February 28, 2014 (USA)
Director: Christopher Spencer
Running time: 2h 18m
Budget: 22 million USD
Producers: Roma Downey, Mark Burnett, Richard Bedser
MPAA rating: PG-13

https://www.amazon.com/Son-God-Di...B00JWEOYCU
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Limited time offer. Terms apply.

77% liked this movie
Google users

In the Holy Land, the Roman occupation has produced a cauldron of oppression, anxiety and excessive taxes levied upon the Jewish people. Fearing the wrath of Roman governor Pontius Pilate (Greg Hicks), Jewish high priest Caiaphas (Adrian Schiller) tries to keep control of his people. That control is threatened when Jesus arrives in Jerusalem, performing miracles and spreading messages of love and hope. Those who fear that Jesus will inspire a revolution decide that he must die.

Release date: February 28, 2014 (USA)
Director: Christopher Spencer
Running time: 2h 18m
Budget: 22 million USD
Producers: Roma Downey, Mark Burnett, Richard Bedser
MPAA rating: PG-13

https://www.amazon.com/Son-God-Di...B00JWEOYCU

Community Voting

Deal Score
+4
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

9 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Last Sunday
556 Posts
Joined Jul 2015
Last Sunday
isaaciaggard
Last Sunday
556 Posts
why does this cover look like Jesus of Des Moines
Pro
Last Tuesday
4,435 Posts
Joined Jan 2009
Last Tuesday
taiwan
Pro
Last Tuesday
4,435 Posts
Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Mary, and Gospel of Judas are equally as important as the Bible.
Original Poster
Pro
Last Tuesday
2,198 Posts
Joined Dec 2020
Last Tuesday
BlueRaccoon1085
Last Tuesday
Original Poster
Pro
2,198 Posts
Quote from taiwan :
Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Mary, and Gospel of Judas are equally as important as the Bible.
Be careful, they are inauthentic and Gnostic.

AI Overview
[IMG]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTNn0HsAAQB8LYq_LZ8KoOR2vIFvTaoio9ob514aNMuq3ByGeWEupbHNQLp&s[/IMG]The Gospel of Thomas was excluded from the New Testament due to several factors, primarily its different theological perspective and its Gnostic leanings, which diverged from the prevailing orthodox Christian views. It wasn't seen as authentic, widely circulated, or read liturgically in early churches, leading to its exclusion from the canonical New Testament.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
  • Different Theological Perspective:
    The Gospel of Thomas presents Jesus and his teachings in a way that differs significantly from the canonical Gospels. It focuses on a collection of sayings attributed to Jesus, many of which are brief and enigmatic. It doesn't focus on the narrative of Jesus's life, death, and resurrection, which is a core element of the canonical Gospels.
  • Gnostic Influences:
    The Gospel of Thomas exhibits Gnostic tendencies, which were not considered orthodox by the early church. Gnosticism emphasized a secret knowledge or enlightenment as a path to salvation, a concept that diverged from the traditional Christian understanding of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.
  • Lack of Wider Circulation and Usage:
    The Gospel of Thomas was not widely circulated or used in early Christian communities compared to the canonical Gospels. It wasn't read liturgically in churches, a key factor in determining which texts were considered canonical.
  • Emergence of the Canon:
    The New Testament canon was not formally established by a single, universally agreed-upon council, but rather emerged gradually over time through the recognition and use of certain texts within the various Christian communities. The Gospel of Thomas didn't gain the same widespread acceptance and usage as the canonical Gospels, ultimately leading to its exclusion.
  • Spurious Nature:
    The Gospel of Thomas is believed to have been written by a Gnostic author, possibly in the late second century, which further contributed to its rejection as a canonical text.


AI Overview
The "Gospel of Mary" was rejected from the New Testament canon primarily because it was deemed Gnostic in theology. This meant it didn't align with the Trinitarian view of God that the early church fathers established as orthodox. Additionally, it presented a different understanding of Jesus's role and Mary Magdalene's position, challenging established hierarchies within the church.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
  • Gnostic Theology:
    The Gospel of Mary, like other Gnostic texts, emphasized a dualistic view of the spiritual and physical worlds. It also focused on inner spiritual knowledge and enlightenment rather than the traditional Christian belief in Jesus's sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins.
  • Trinitarian Theology:
    The early church fathers compiled the canon based on texts that supported a Trinitarian God (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), a created fallen humanity (Adam and Eve), and a battle between good and evil. The Gospel of Mary's Gnostic views conflicted with this established Trinitarian orthodoxy.
  • Mary Magdalene's Role:
    The Gospel of Mary portrays Mary Magdalene as a prominent figure who received secret teachings from Jesus, which challenged the patriarchal structure of the church and the traditionally lower status of women.
  • Apostolic Succession:
    Apostolic succession, the belief that bishops held authority through a line of succession from the apostles, was another factor in canon formation. The Gospel of Mary didn't have a clear apostolic lineage and was written later than the other gospels, further diminishing its credibility.
  • Other Factors:
    The text was also not widely accepted or used in early church worship, and its format and content, which focused on inner revelation, differed from the narrative style of the canonical gospels.
The "Gospel of Judas" was not "removed" from the Bible, as it wasn't originally included in the canon. It's considered a Gnostic gospel, distinct from the four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) and was excluded for various reasons, including its theological differences and inconsistencies with established Christian beliefs.


Here's a more detailed explanation:

  • Not part of the initial canon:
    The New Testament was formed over time, through a process of selection and acceptance of texts that were considered authoritative and inspired. The "Gospel of Judas" wasn't among the texts chosen for inclusion.
  • Gnostic perspective:
    The "Gospel of Judas" reflects a Gnostic viewpoint, which emphasizes secret knowledge and the idea that the material world is a creation of an inferior deity. This contrasts with the mainstream Christian understanding of God and creation.
  • Different narrative:
    It presents a different interpretation of Jesus and his relationship with Judas than the canonical gospels. For example, it portrays Judas as a close confidante who helped Jesus escape his earthly form, rather than the betrayer depicted in the canonical narratives.
  • Historical context:
    The "Gospel of Judas" was written relatively late, potentially in the 2nd century, after the New Testament was largely formed.
  • Not considered authoritative:
    While it provides interesting insights into early Christian beliefs and the diversity of thought, it's not considered an authoritative source of information about Jesus's life and teachings by mainstream Christian denominations.
Pro
Last Tuesday
4,435 Posts
Joined Jan 2009
Last Tuesday
taiwan
Pro
Last Tuesday
4,435 Posts
Quote from BlueRaccoon1085 :
Be careful, they are inauthentic and Gnostic.
Says who? A council created by a dictator in Rome? The fact that Vatican probably kept a copy of every book but refused to open them to public, the fact that the council persecuted (and often killed) fellow Christians (Gnostic or not) for keeping other gospels, did nothing to prove the inauthenticity. Sure, some gospel described Jesus rising and floating in the thin air was a bit too far. But I don't know why the lines must be drawn there but not elsewhere. Gospel of Thomas was discovered in a tomb. Somehow this priest loved the gospel so much he decided to take it with him afterlife.
Original Poster
Pro
Last Tuesday
2,198 Posts
Joined Dec 2020
Last Tuesday
BlueRaccoon1085
Last Tuesday
Original Poster
Pro
2,198 Posts
EDIT: Someone's comment I was replying to saying Jesus Christ was fictional was deleted.

Praying for you.

"For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God."--John 3:17-18.

"He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned."--Mark 16:16.

"Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son."--1 John 2:22.
Original Poster
Pro
Last Tuesday
2,198 Posts
Joined Dec 2020
Last Tuesday
BlueRaccoon1085
Last Tuesday
Original Poster
Pro
2,198 Posts
Quote from taiwan :
Says who? A council created by a dictator in Rome? The fact that Vatican probably kept a copy of every book but refused to open them to public, the fact that the council persecuted (and often killed) fellow Christians (Gnostic or not) for keeping other gospels, did nothing to prove the inauthenticity. Sure, some gospel described Jesus rising and floating in the thin air was a bit too far. But I don't know why the lines must be drawn there but not elsewhere. Gospel of Thomas was discovered in a tomb. Somehow this priest loved the gospel so much he decided to take it with him afterlife.
Says Early Orthodox Christian leaders. Were the Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Mary, and Gospel of Judas truly inspired by God? I think not. The language style and beliefs are not consistent with the books of the Bible. Heck, the Vatican (and many churches today) are corrupt and hypocritical. There is a reason why the Catholic Church includes the Apocrypha which are known to be inauthentic while Protestantism does not. It adds words to the Bible with contradictory beliefs, adding to the confusion.

Also, Gnosticism is opposite to true Christianity, even resembling the beliefs of Freemasons and occultists:

Gnosticism was rejected by the Church primarily because it contradicted core Christian beliefs about Jesus, God, and salvation. Gnostics believed in a mysterious "knowledge" (gnosis) for salvation, denying the importance of Jesus' physical body, his resurrection, and the need for redemption through faith. They also viewed the material world as inherently evil, which clashed with the Christian understanding of God as the creator of all things.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:




  • Different understandings of Jesus:
    Gnostics believed that Jesus only appeared to have a physical body and that his death and resurrection were not literal events. This contradicted the orthodox Christian belief in Jesus' full humanity and divinity.
  • Emphasis on knowledge over grace:
    Gnostics believed salvation came through special, secret knowledge, not through faith in Jesus' sacrifice and grace.
  • Dualistic view of God and the world:
    Gnostics held that God was a transcendent, benevolent deity, while the material world was created by an inferior, evil being. This contradicted the Christian view of God as the creator of all things, good and bad.
  • Conflict with apostolic tradition:
    Early Church leaders like Irenaeus argued that Gnosticism's teachings contradicted the apostolic tradition, which they believed was passed down from the apostles through established churches.
In essence, Gnosticism was seen as a deviation from the core tenets of Christianity, leading to its condemnation as heresy by the Church
Pro
Last Tuesday
4,435 Posts
Joined Jan 2009
Last Tuesday
taiwan
Pro
Last Tuesday
4,435 Posts
Quote from BlueRaccoon1085 :
Says Early Orthodox Christian leaders.
What did they know? I trust today's scholars more than the orthodox Christian leaders from thousands of years ago. There are evidence that gospel of Thomas was a source for Mark. It's generally accepted that there was a Q source for all the books/gospels. The fact that Q source didn't survive but the filtered subsets did should tell you something is not right.

Honestly I don't think we know what the true Christianity really is, though DT is often considered to be the second coming of Jesus, maybe he should be the Constantine 2.0 and revamp the religion.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Original Poster
Pro
6d ago
2,198 Posts
Joined Dec 2020
6d ago
BlueRaccoon1085
6d ago
Original Poster
Pro
2,198 Posts
Quote from taiwan :
What did they know? I trust today's scholars more than the orthodox Christian leaders from thousands of years ago. There are evidence that gospel of Thomas was a source for Mark. It's generally accepted that there was a Q source for all the books/gospels. The fact that Q source didn't survive but the filtered subsets did should tell you something is not right. Honestly I don't think we know what the true Christianity really is, though DT is often considered to be the second coming of Jesus, maybe he should be the Constantine 2.0 and revamp the religion.
"And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many."--Matthew 24:3-5.
5d ago
80 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
5d ago
jedair
5d ago
80 Posts
VUDU has it for $5 as well The movie is MA too. Haven't seen it yet but happy of the abundance of new faith based films and shows.

"But God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." Romans 5:8

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All