320w is a model not Wattage, also only has two 65W max (not even concurrently) ports.
Poor reviews. This device is likely a fraud.
"Misleading charging capacity
This USB-C charging station earns 2 star due to its practicality that could charge several devices at once. However, this charger does NOT deliver 65W nor 20W as it is stated in the item's description. Using the USB-A 20W, I charged my cellphone and it took 38 minutes to charge 10% of the cell's battery. At this charging rate it would have taken 3 hour and 48 minutes to fully charge my cellphone. Using the USB-C 65W I charged my laptop and it took 58 minutes to charge 29% of the laptop's battery. As I mentioned before, the charger itself is practical since it can be used to slowly charge several devices, and because of this, it is worth its price."
"320w is a model not Wattage, also only has two 65W max (not even concurrently) ports
The 320w is a model designator, now wattage capability of the device. I know the product doesn't claim is is 320Watt charger, but it can be misleading to shoppers. This unit is actually less capable of less power than the 260w model which is cheaper. First, it does not have four 65W max ports as in the description Charging Guide, it only has two - see my picture showing the back plate label. Also worth noting that you cannot use both 65W ports at the same time at 65W - when both are plugged in, one turns into a 45W max and the other one to 32W max port (77W total). The other two USB-C ports don't even appear to support PD (the first two ports do)."
forum thread Posted by Meowssi | Staff • 2d ago
May 11, 2025 3:16 PM
Item 1 of 4
Item 1 of 4
forum thread Posted by Meowssi | Staff • 2d ago
May 11, 2025 3:16 PM
Prime Members: MEKIOJEO 320W 7-Port USB-C GaN 3 Aluminum Alloy Wall Charger (Various Colors) $26.99 + Free Shipping
$27
$43
37% offAmazon
Get Deal at AmazonGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
17 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I think a 100w 7 ports charger worth $26. Compare to similar Anker products which are $40+.
If you are just charging phones or tablets, I don't think you need more than 50w. And charging too fast will overheat/kill the battery
I think a 100w 7 ports charger worth it. Compare to similar Anker products which are $40+.
If you are just charging phones or tablets, I don't think you need more than 50w. And charging too fast will overheat/kill the battery
"Worry the charger will do damage to battery?
Another 5 less-power ports like 20W and 15W can charge iphone, earpods,etc."
Check out before-after picture
https://m.media-amazon.com/images..._V1___
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Yes. The charger that comes with her laptop is 65 watts, which this matches.
I think a 100w 7 ports charger worth $26. Compare to similar Anker products which are $40+.
If you are just charging phones or tablets, I don't think you need more than 50w. And charging too fast will overheat/kill the battery
USB devices don't pull more electricity than they're designed for. Fast charging does age batteries faster than slow charging, but again that's within design parameters. You can extend the life further by making sure your charging location is close to the ground, an air conditioner, fan, and or a dark space. Also we have three cells phones and two are rated for 45W charging so your 50W recommendation is highly dependent on the devices being used.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank skardem
Poor reviews. This device is likely a fraud.
"Misleading charging capacity
This USB-C charging station earns 2 star due to its practicality that could charge several devices at once. However, this charger does NOT deliver 65W nor 20W as it is stated in the item's description. Using the USB-A 20W, I charged my cellphone and it took 38 minutes to charge 10% of the cell's battery. At this charging rate it would have taken 3 hour and 48 minutes to fully charge my cellphone. Using the USB-C 65W I charged my laptop and it took 58 minutes to charge 29% of the laptop's battery. As I mentioned before, the charger itself is practical since it can be used to slowly charge several devices, and because of this, it is worth its price."
"320w is a model not Wattage, also only has two 65W max (not even concurrently) ports
The 320w is a model designator, now wattage capability of the device. I know the product doesn't claim is is 320Watt charger, but it can be misleading to shoppers. This unit is actually less capable of less power than the 260w model which is cheaper. First, it does not have four 65W max ports as in the description Charging Guide, it only has two - see my picture showing the back plate label. Also worth noting that you cannot use both 65W ports at the same time at 65W - when both are plugged in, one turns into a 45W max and the other one to 32W max port (77W total). The other two USB-C ports don't even appear to support PD (the first two ports do)."
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.