Slickdeals is community-supported.ย  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expireddoublehelixx | Staff posted Jul 9, 2025 8:24 PM

[Prime] Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) $16.99 + Free Shipping

$17

$38

55% off
Amazon
4.9K Views
Visit Amazon
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has for Prime Members: Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) for $16.99. Shipping is free.
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has for Prime Members: Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) for $16.99. Shipping is free.

Community Voting

Deal Score
+6
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

17 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 9, 2025 8:27 PM
2.8K Comments
Joined Feb 2013
rogereJul 9, 2025 8:27 PM
2.8K Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank rogere

Terrible movie. Not even worth $5
2
6
Jul 10, 2025 12:18 AM
13K Comments
Joined Jul 2010
supermanrobJul 10, 2025 12:18 AM
13K Comments
Quote from rogere :
Terrible movie. Not even worth $5
I'm not sure I would say terrible but yes wasn't the best.

I will pick it up if/when it hits around $8.
To have both & the transfer on this is pretty much reference.
The transfer is definitely better than the 1st one which is unfortunate.

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Gl...ay/365746/
Last edited by supermanrob July 12, 2025 at 09:27 AM.
4
Jul 10, 2025 12:50 AM
1.1K Comments
Joined Dec 2011
RussellBellJul 10, 2025 12:50 AM
1.1K Comments
This was a bad movie. Denzel seemed to be having fun though.
Jul 10, 2025 1:07 AM
13 Comments
Joined Mar 2012
junkrgJul 10, 2025 1:07 AM
13 Comments
Terrible movie but may purchase this at around 10-11$ just for watching Denzel who was brilliant as usual.
1
Jul 10, 2025 11:15 AM
841 Comments
Joined Jul 2022
VioletHealth8715Jul 10, 2025 11:15 AM
841 Comments
Studios ask Ridley Scott to make a 2 hour movie, so he makes a 6 hour movie and then cuts it down to 2.

The pace of this was way too fast, you were thrown into one thing after the other without having a care at all because you didn't have time to associate with any of the characters.

I'd wait for the directors cut to come out. That's when you'll see the movie as the director envisioned it. Granted it'll be like 4 hours long, but that's what's needed here. Nobody liked this because it was way too condensed.

Not defending Ridley, studios time and time again tell him "we need 2-3 hours" and he delivers 6, so they have to cut half of it and it creates problems.

Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
Jul 10, 2025 6:05 PM
1.1K Comments
Joined Dec 2011
RussellBellJul 10, 2025 6:05 PM
1.1K Comments
Quote from VioletHealth8715 :
...Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
Citizen Dondas: Am I a joke to you???
2
Jul 11, 2025 5:09 PM
267 Comments
Joined Nov 2012
JakeS5663Jul 11, 2025 5:09 PM
267 Comments
Oh man, the box quote for this atrocity is "one of the most entertaining films of the year" Now that is the kind of blind confidence I wish I had.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 11, 2025 5:28 PM
2.8K Comments
Joined Oct 2006
nin7474Jul 11, 2025 5:28 PM
2.8K Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank nin7474

Please don't HORRIBLE movie. The sharks scene was LMAO
1
Jul 11, 2025 9:02 PM
86 Comments
Joined Sep 2016
MayorOfSexyTownJul 11, 2025 9:02 PM
86 Comments
It was awful movie, we warned you.
1
Jul 12, 2025 12:20 PM
148 Comments
Joined Aug 2016
lanceswordJul 12, 2025 12:20 PM
148 Comments
Quote from nin7474 :
Please don't HORRIBLE movie. The sharks scene was LMAO
You think gladiatorial games with ships and sharks is not historically accurate? Hahaha๐Ÿ˜‚
Jul 12, 2025 3:11 PM
13K Comments
Joined Jul 2010
supermanrobJul 12, 2025 3:11 PM
13K Comments
Quote from lancesword :
You think gladiatorial games with ships and sharks is not historically accurate? Hahaha๐Ÿ˜‚
Actually they did fill the Colosseum with water to recreate naval battles.
The sharks were a bit over the top though.๐Ÿ˜œ
Jul 12, 2025 3:17 PM
148 Comments
Joined Aug 2016
lanceswordJul 12, 2025 3:17 PM
148 Comments
Quote from supermanrob :
Actually they did fill the Colosseum with water to recreate naval battles.
The sharks were a bit over the top though.๐Ÿ˜œ
The stuff I learn on slick dealsโ€ฆ love it.
Jul 13, 2025 2:09 PM
6.4K Comments
Joined Mar 2013
4SKZ8Jul 13, 2025 2:09 PM
6.4K Comments
๐Ÿ‘ sike ๐Ÿ‘Ž - Commodus
Last edited by SKV4m July 13, 2025 at 09:02 AM.
Jul 14, 2025 12:13 AM
815 Comments
Joined Nov 2010
liqwickedJul 14, 2025 12:13 AM
815 Comments
Quote from VioletHealth8715 :
Studios ask Ridley Scott to make a 2 hour movie, so he makes a 6 hour movie and then cuts it down to 2.

The pace of this was way too fast, you were thrown into one thing after the other without having a care at all because you didn't have time to associate with any of the characters.

I'd wait for the directors cut to come out. That's when you'll see the movie as the director envisioned it. Granted it'll be like 4 hours long, but that's what's needed here. Nobody liked this because it was way too condensed.

Not defending Ridley, studios time and time again tell him "we need 2-3 hours" and he delivers 6, so they have to cut half of it and it creates problems.

Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
I felt the same. great review

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 14, 2025 12:23 AM
8 Comments
Joined Feb 2020
PowerfulHalibut217Jul 14, 2025 12:23 AM
8 Comments
Director Ridley Scott recently revealed that the original cut of the film was longer - significantly longer. While the film's current runtime of 148 minutes is nothing to scoff at, the film's first cut ran nearly four hours, which would've made it one of the longest projects the director had done.
Scott revealed the news in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter. "[The first cut] ended around 3:40," Scott said, or about 220 minutes. "I know that's unrealistic. I think with the titles it's about 2:33, so the film itself is about 2:20. I wanted to put the opening titles at the beginning, not at the end. But they ran two-and-a-half minutes โ€” which is a long time to look at a black screen." Scott then brought in outside assistance to help cut the film down: animator Gianluigi Toccafondo, who animated the title card for Scott's production company, Scott Free, to shift the opening titles around, shortening the film.
But while audiences at the theater may not be seeing the nearly four-hour version of Gladiator II, this doesn't mean that this couldn't happen in the future, according to the director.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Popular Deals

Trending Deals