Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
populardoublehelixx | Staff posted Jul 09, 2025 08:24 PM
populardoublehelixx | Staff posted Jul 09, 2025 08:24 PM

[Prime] Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) $16.99 + Free Shipping

$17

$38

55% off
Amazon
16 Comments 3,503 Views
Get Deal at Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has for Prime Members: Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) for $16.99. Shipping is free.
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has for Prime Members: Gladiator II (4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital) for $16.99. Shipping is free.

Community Voting

Deal Score
+6
Good Deal
Get Deal at Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Gladiator II [4K UHD + Blu-Ray + Digital]

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 7/30/2025, 03:08 PM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$19.96

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

16 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 09, 2025 08:27 PM
2,752 Posts
Joined Feb 2013
Jul 09, 2025 08:27 PM
rogereJul 09, 2025 08:27 PM
2,752 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank rogere

Terrible movie. Not even worth $5
1
6
Pro
Jul 10, 2025 12:18 AM
11,429 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
Jul 10, 2025 12:18 AM
supermanrob
Pro
Jul 10, 2025 12:18 AM
11,429 Posts
Quote from rogere :
Terrible movie. Not even worth $5

I'm not sure I would say terrible but yes wasn't the best.

I will pick it up if/when it hits around $8.
To have both & the transfer on this is pretty much reference.
The transfer is definitely better than the 1st one which is unfortunate.

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Gl...ay/365746/
Last edited by supermanrob July 12, 2025 at 09:27 AM.
4
Jul 10, 2025 12:50 AM
1,067 Posts
Joined Dec 2011
Jul 10, 2025 12:50 AM
RussellBellJul 10, 2025 12:50 AM
1,067 Posts
This was a bad movie. Denzel seemed to be having fun though.
Jul 10, 2025 01:07 AM
11 Posts
Joined Mar 2012
Jul 10, 2025 01:07 AM
junkrgJul 10, 2025 01:07 AM
11 Posts
Terrible movie but may purchase this at around 10-11$ just for watching Denzel who was brilliant as usual.
1
Jul 10, 2025 11:15 AM
598 Posts
Joined Jul 2022
Jul 10, 2025 11:15 AM
VioletHealth8715Jul 10, 2025 11:15 AM
598 Posts
Studios ask Ridley Scott to make a 2 hour movie, so he makes a 6 hour movie and then cuts it down to 2.

The pace of this was way too fast, you were thrown into one thing after the other without having a care at all because you didn't have time to associate with any of the characters.

I'd wait for the directors cut to come out. That's when you'll see the movie as the director envisioned it. Granted it'll be like 4 hours long, but that's what's needed here. Nobody liked this because it was way too condensed.

Not defending Ridley, studios time and time again tell him "we need 2-3 hours" and he delivers 6, so they have to cut half of it and it creates problems.

Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
Jul 10, 2025 06:05 PM
1,067 Posts
Joined Dec 2011
Jul 10, 2025 06:05 PM
RussellBellJul 10, 2025 06:05 PM
1,067 Posts
Quote from VioletHealth8715 :
...Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
Citizen Dondas: Am I a joke to you???
1
Jul 11, 2025 05:09 PM
177 Posts
Joined Nov 2012
Jul 11, 2025 05:09 PM
JakeS5663Jul 11, 2025 05:09 PM
177 Posts
Oh man, the box quote for this atrocity is "one of the most entertaining films of the year" Now that is the kind of blind confidence I wish I had.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 11, 2025 05:28 PM
2,696 Posts
Joined Oct 2006
Jul 11, 2025 05:28 PM
nin7474Jul 11, 2025 05:28 PM
2,696 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank nin7474

Please don't HORRIBLE movie. The sharks scene was LMAO
1
Jul 11, 2025 09:02 PM
66 Posts
Joined Sep 2016
Jul 11, 2025 09:02 PM
MayorOfSexyTownJul 11, 2025 09:02 PM
66 Posts
It was awful movie, we warned you.
1
Jul 12, 2025 12:20 PM
129 Posts
Joined Aug 2016
Jul 12, 2025 12:20 PM
lanceswordJul 12, 2025 12:20 PM
129 Posts
Quote from nin7474 :
Please don't HORRIBLE movie. The sharks scene was LMAO

You think gladiatorial games with ships and sharks is not historically accurate? Hahaha😂
Pro
Jul 12, 2025 03:11 PM
11,429 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
Jul 12, 2025 03:11 PM
supermanrob
Pro
Jul 12, 2025 03:11 PM
11,429 Posts
Quote from lancesword :
You think gladiatorial games with ships and sharks is not historically accurate? Hahaha😂

Actually they did fill the Colosseum with water to recreate naval battles.
The sharks were a bit over the top though.😜
Jul 12, 2025 03:17 PM
129 Posts
Joined Aug 2016
Jul 12, 2025 03:17 PM
lanceswordJul 12, 2025 03:17 PM
129 Posts
Quote from supermanrob :
Actually they did fill the Colosseum with water to recreate naval battles.
The sharks were a bit over the top though.😜

The stuff I learn on slick deals… love it.
Jul 13, 2025 02:09 PM
4,671 Posts
Joined Mar 2013
Jul 13, 2025 02:09 PM
SKV4mJul 13, 2025 02:09 PM
4,671 Posts
👍 sike 👎 - Commodus
Last edited by SKV4m July 13, 2025 at 09:02 AM.
Jul 14, 2025 12:13 AM
750 Posts
Joined Nov 2010
Jul 14, 2025 12:13 AM
liqwickedJul 14, 2025 12:13 AM
750 Posts
Quote from VioletHealth8715 :
Studios ask Ridley Scott to make a 2 hour movie, so he makes a 6 hour movie and then cuts it down to 2.

The pace of this was way too fast, you were thrown into one thing after the other without having a care at all because you didn't have time to associate with any of the characters.

I'd wait for the directors cut to come out. That's when you'll see the movie as the director envisioned it. Granted it'll be like 4 hours long, but that's what's needed here. Nobody liked this because it was way too condensed.

Not defending Ridley, studios time and time again tell him "we need 2-3 hours" and he delivers 6, so they have to cut half of it and it creates problems.

Best characters were the two emperors. Sadly they don't get much screen time.
I felt the same. great review

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 14, 2025 12:23 AM
6 Posts
Joined Feb 2020
Jul 14, 2025 12:23 AM
PowerfulHalibut217Jul 14, 2025 12:23 AM
6 Posts
Director Ridley Scott recently revealed that the original cut of the film was longer - significantly longer. While the film's current runtime of 148 minutes is nothing to scoff at, the film's first cut ran nearly four hours, which would've made it one of the longest projects the director had done.
Scott revealed the news in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter. "[The first cut] ended around 3:40," Scott said, or about 220 minutes. "I know that's unrealistic. I think with the titles it's about 2:33, so the film itself is about 2:20. I wanted to put the opening titles at the beginning, not at the end. But they ran two-and-a-half minutes — which is a long time to look at a black screen." Scott then brought in outside assistance to help cut the film down: animator Gianluigi Toccafondo, who animated the title card for Scott's production company, Scott Free, to shift the opening titles around, shortening the film.
But while audiences at the theater may not be seeing the nearly four-hour version of Gladiator II, this doesn't mean that this couldn't happen in the future, according to the director.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All