popularf12_26 | Staff posted Aug 03, 2025 06:25 PM
Item 1 of 2
Item 1 of 2
popularf12_26 | Staff posted Aug 03, 2025 06:25 PM
(2x) WD Red SA500 NAS SATA SSD M.2 2280: 500GB $124.08, 1TB $186.98, 2TB $339.98
$124
$152
18% offSanDisk
Get Deal at SanDiskGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Leave a Comment
13 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Fanofnori
Should be better for 24/7 NAS usage. The 2TB Red has a TBW rating of 2500, as compared to 1200 for the WD 850x 2TB. In that regard, the Red is made to withstand twice as many writes over its lifetime.
Addendum. The Reds are MUCH slower than a typical PCIe nvme. But, for NAS usage the network is a significant bottleneck which means the speed difference will likely not be noticeable.
Hmm. Three thoughts that come to mind are how frequently you update your media library (if frequently, that's a lot of large writes), whether your m.2 slots support SATA versus the more common NVMe, and how replaceable the data is (more importance in high quality drive).
If you write over the drive a lot, your hardware supports m.2 SATA and your data is irreplaceable, these Reds may make sense. Otherwise, might not make sense for the premium.
Addendum. The Reds are MUCH slower than a typical PCIe nvme. But, for NAS usage the network is a significant bottleneck which means the speed difference will likely not be noticeable.
Another question, these would be going into a QNAP system as a cache type of system with 4x14tb raid setup. I mainly use it for backing up photos and videos from my phone, important documents, etc. Would I benefit from these and what size would be optimal value wise?
According to QNAP, there are also minimum RAM requirements depending on your hardware and the size of SSD cache.
The Reds are probably a good idea for cache, as there will likely be a lot of writes. The bigger the cache the fewer writes but still… cache duty is likely write intensive.
https://kb.synology.com/en-us/DSM..._SSD_Cach
https://www.qnap.com/en/solution/ssd-cache
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I use a single 1tb m.2 in my nas, it is basically for docker apps and another backup location for any critical items. Edit: non-red ssd
Addendum. The Reds are MUCH slower than a typical PCIe nvme. But, for NAS usage the network is a significant bottleneck which means the speed difference will likely not be noticeable.
According to QNAP, there are also minimum RAM requirements depending on your hardware and the size of SSD cache.
The Reds are probably a good idea for cache, as there will likely be a lot of writes. The bigger the cache the fewer writes but still… cache duty is likely write intensive.
https://kb.synology.com/en-us/DSM..._SSD_Cache [synology.com]
https://www.qnap.com/en/solution/ssd-cache
I had drive failure after about 3 years of use. The thing is, once your nvmes fail, the system goes into lockdown mode and does not allow you to read data until you fix the nvme.
But wait, the drive "died", so how to fix?
reddit said to place a different nvme and see if you can temp pass the checks before it crashes again.
I basically did this, but in order to disable read wrote cache i had to uninstall a bunch of programs to fix. It wqs weird and took me 2 "surprise" hours and a lot of worrying.
Experience scared me straight - not worth it.
Leave a Comment