Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
expired
expired
phoinix | Staff 3.8K Views
Dec 22, 2025 5:01 PM

$279.99: 32″ Samsung Odyssey G5 G50F QHD Resolution Gaming Monitor, 180Hz, Fast IPS (LS32FG502ENXZA) at Amazon

$280

$350

20% off
Amazon
Visit Amazon

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
8Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has 32″ Samsung Odyssey G5 G50F QHD Resolution Gaming Monitor, 180Hz, Fast IPS (LS32FG502ENXZA) for $279.99.
Shipping is free.

Price
$70 lower (20% savings) than the list price of $349.99



amazon.com/dp/B0G1DZM5QW [amazon.com]

My other deals
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has 32″ Samsung Odyssey G5 G50F QHD Resolution Gaming Monitor, 180Hz, Fast IPS (LS32FG502ENXZA) for $279.99.
Shipping is free.

Price
$70 lower (20% savings) than the list price of $349.99



amazon.com/dp/B0G1DZM5QW [amazon.com]

My other deals

Community Voting

Deal Score
+2
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Visit Amazon

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

8 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Dec 23, 2025 12:35 AM
2.9K Comments
Joined Sep 2004
spike32
Pro
Dec 23, 2025 12:35 AM
2.9K Comments
How recent is the monitor. Only reviews (paid reviewers)
2
Dec 23, 2025 3:41 PM
2K Comments
Joined Dec 2005
cj0rDec 23, 2025 3:41 PM
2K Comments
At 32", highly recommend 4k minimum resolution. For gaming, if you want to hit the higher frame rates, just lower res or use resolution scaling in-game. Don't lock yourself into qhd/2k resolution for your general computing though, make the 32" real estate count with a proper res to compliment it.

That said, after switching to a 32 at 4K, you will never be able to go back down in size or res. It's very comfortable and anything less feels awkward especially if you work on it 8+ hours a day.
3
Dec 27, 2025 8:10 AM
247 Comments
Joined Oct 2009
bineverlastDec 27, 2025 8:10 AM
247 Comments
Quote from cj0r View quoted comment :
At 32", highly recommend 4k minimum resolution. For gaming, if you want to hit the higher frame rates, just lower res or use resolution scaling in-game. Don't lock yourself into qhd/2k resolution for your general computing though, make the 32" real estate count with a proper res to compliment it.

That said, after switching to a 32 at 4K, you will never be able to go back down in size or res. It's very comfortable and anything less feels awkward especially if you work on it 8+ hours a day.
this can not be more untrue. 32" UHD is way too small for most people, you would have to scale up at to at least 150%, may be even 200%. 110 ppi is the widely accepted sweet spot for most people, which translates to 27" QHD or 34" UWQHD
2
Dec 28, 2025 5:42 PM
180 Comments
Joined Apr 2015
IanB8513Dec 28, 2025 5:42 PM
180 Comments
Quote from bineverlast View quoted comment :
this can not be more untrue. 32" UHD is way too small for most people, you would have to scale up at to at least 150%, may be even 200%. 110 ppi is the widely accepted sweet spot for most people, which translates to 27" QHD or 34" UWQHD
QHD is noticeably pixelated for me at 27 inches with smaller fonts. 32 would be distracting.Maybe there's no hard and fast rules and people should judge by their needs and preferences.
Dec 29, 2025 1:09 AM
5.3K Comments
Joined Nov 2011
JayhawkDealsDec 29, 2025 1:09 AM
5.3K Comments
Quote from cj0r View quoted comment :
At 32", highly recommend 4k minimum resolution. For gaming, if you want to hit the higher frame rates, just lower res or use resolution scaling in-game. Don't lock yourself into qhd/2k resolution for your general computing though, make the 32" real estate count with a proper res to compliment it. That said, after switching to a 32 at 4K, you will never be able to go back down in size or res. It's very comfortable and anything less feels awkward especially if you work on it 8+ hours a day.
Running lower than native res looks like crap.
Dec 29, 2025 1:19 AM
1.1K Comments
Joined Apr 2006
m47150Dec 29, 2025 1:19 AM
1.1K Comments
Quote from bineverlast View quoted comment :
this can not be more untrue. 32" UHD is way too small for most people, you would have to scale up at to at least 150%, may be even 200%. 110 ppi is the widely accepted sweet spot for most people, which translates to 27" QHD or 34" UWQHD
You'd be a good politician. You make a false claim, support it with data that doesn't back up your claim and then act like it does.

The ppi of the monitor in this thread is 88 and that difference to 110 is substantial.

Also, you completely missed the mark on scaling. I completely agree that I do not have a single monitor that I own that is 4k that is actually at a 100% scaling. Regardless of scaling, the resolution matters when cleaning up artifacts that present themselves when trying to display content. An example is when you scale something bigger and make the font bigger, a lower resolution will have a hard time curving the latters to not look jagged.
Last edited by m47150 December 28, 2025 at 05:25 PM.
Dec 29, 2025 1:20 AM
1.1K Comments
Joined Apr 2006
m47150Dec 29, 2025 1:20 AM
1.1K Comments
Quote from cj0r View quoted comment :
At 32", highly recommend 4k minimum resolution. For gaming, if you want to hit the higher frame rates, just lower res or use resolution scaling in-game. Don't lock yourself into qhd/2k resolution for your general computing though, make the 32" real estate count with a proper res to compliment it. That said, after switching to a 32 at 4K, you will never be able to go back down in size or res. It's very comfortable and anything less feels awkward especially if you work on it 8+ hours a day.
The downvotes here are absurd

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 4, 2026 5:38 AM
2K Comments
Joined Dec 2005
cj0rJan 4, 2026 5:38 AM
2K Comments
Quote from JayhawkDeals View quoted comment :
Running lower than native res looks like crap.
I said nothing about visual quality only higher frame rates for gaming. Considering I use my monitor far more for production work vs gaming, that will be my priority and my post was meant to convey that.

To the other poster, yes the down votes on my original post are by idiots and there's no other explanation.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Related Searches

ComputersMonitorsOccasionsChristmasTech & ElectronicsSamsungAmazon