Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
This Deal Has Expired We can notify you when similar deals are posted. Set up Deal Alert
expired
N3RD_01 4.2K Views
Jan 7, 2026 6:03 AM

Nikon D800 36.3 MP CMOS FX-Format Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) $629.99

$630

$2,015

68% off
Woot!
Visit Woot!

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
28Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Nikon D800 36.3 MP CMOS FX-Format Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

https://electronics.woot.com/offe...cnt_wp_0_1
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Nikon D800 36.3 MP CMOS FX-Format Digital SLR Camera (Body Only)

https://electronics.woot.com/offe...cnt_wp_0_1

Community Voting

Deal Score
+2
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Community Reviews

The Nikon D800 is a high resolution full frame DSLR that still stands out for landscapes, slow subjects, and backup use, especially if you already own Nikon F mount glass. It accepts F mount lenses, including older screw drive lenses, and full frame lenses are the safest fit. The body feels dated, though, with slower autofocus, a 1080p video limit, modest burst speed, and one CompactFlash slot. Used market cautions also include early focus misadjustment and a weak frame, so it suits buyers who know Nikon and what they need.

Common Questions (5)

  • It is a capable full-frame DSLR, but several comments call the price high for a 2012 body that can be found used for much less. The main value case is for someone who already owns Nikon full-frame F-mount glass and wants a high-resolution body for landscapes or slow-moving subjects.

  • It accepts Nikon F-mount lenses, including DX lenses that will crop automatically, and it has a built-in focus motor for older screw-drive lenses. Some AF-P and other body-specific lenses may not work on every Nikon body, so compatibility still needs a manual check.

  • Yes, it makes the most sense for someone already invested in Nikon full-frame F-mount lenses and who does not need fast autofocus or high FPS. For everyone else, newer refurbished bodies or other systems are a better fit.

  • Its biggest drawbacks are a relatively slow burst rate, older CompactFlash support in one slot, and dated autofocus and video by modern standards. It tops out at 1080p video, and the burst rate only improves to about 6 fps with the 1.2x crop mode and grip.

  • Used D800/D800E bodies can have early factory focus misadjustments and a weak internal frame that may be broken without obvious signs. Those issues can mean extra service cost or no practical fix, so a used purchase should be inspected carefully.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

28 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 7, 2026 9:30 PM
118 Comments
Joined Dec 2023
1More1Jan 7, 2026 9:30 PM
118 Comments
OOS. Guess this was another, Only One Item, in Woot for sale!
Pro
Jan 7, 2026 9:40 PM
8.2K Comments
Joined Oct 2004
VarmintCong
Pro
Jan 7, 2026 9:40 PM
8.2K Comments
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 View quoted comment :
And for those who ARE familiar with Nikon, they're laughing as they go with literally any other camera manufacturer!
Showing your true colors, if it wasn't obvious already.
2
Jan 7, 2026 9:46 PM
202 Comments
Joined Aug 2013
davestavrosJan 7, 2026 9:46 PM
202 Comments
This is a great camera. Price is maybe a bit high but used ones could have 100,000 shutter actuations by now. This (and the Sony A7R) were the first cameras with modern, high resolution sensors. Everything before this camera is a relic, but this camera can still hold its own for landscapes and slow moving stuff. Where it will show its age is in autofocus (slow and not accurate phase detect compared to modern cameras) and video (1080p max). For landscape photography that is irrelevant because you can use the live-view autofocus.

I don't know about the price of f-mount lenses now. Most photogs have made the switch by now, but they were dirt cheap when Nikon first started releasing decent mirrorless cameras. You can probably get gold ring f-mount lenses for less than kit z-mount.
Pro
Jan 7, 2026 9:51 PM
8.2K Comments
Joined Oct 2004
VarmintCong
Pro
Jan 7, 2026 9:51 PM
8.2K Comments
Quote from Maverick919 View quoted comment :
Based on the comments, doesnt look like a good option for a beginner?
There's not much benefit to a new (very) old body - you can get a factory refurbished more recent model - this is more for someone who already has Nikon full frame lenses and wants the relatively high MP, and doesn't need high FPS or fast AF, like a landscape shooter.
1
Jan 7, 2026 10:17 PM
5.2K Comments
Joined Sep 2019

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

Jan 8, 2026 3:17 PM
446 Comments
Joined Dec 2006
FantasysageJan 8, 2026 3:17 PM
446 Comments
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 View quoted comment :
I'd be much more careful about lenses. There are plenty of lenses that can be damaged or just not work, depending on the F-mount body you put them on. It's absolutely NOT "just put it on and it'll work". Been burned enough times with Nikon to not want to mess with them.

edit: I wanted to get a "Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Lens"...and I had a Nikon D300 camera. Spent the extra dollerydoos for a modern camera, and it had all the compatibility. Screw-drive motor linkages and whatnot.

Nope. AF-P, even with it being for crop sensor, doesn't work on the D300. Because reasons.

Whereas with Canon, you have EF mount. Comes in two flavors -- EF full frame and EF-S crop sensor. That's it. The earliest lenses from the mid-1980s EF-mount film cameras work without issue even on the last EF-mount DSLRs produced. Sure, there might be one or two exceptions -- but they're a rarity, usually reserved for half-baked third party lenses, and you can count them on one hand with fingers to spare.

With Sony, it's even better. E-mount. Bam. There's crop sensor and full-frame, but pretty much any E-mount camera will take either type and adjust accordingly.

Nikon? Break out the secret decoder ring! There's some ancient F-mount manual lenses that will break if you put them on the wrong camera style, because reasons.

When there are SO MANY other camera manufacturers out there with SO MANY lenses to choose from -- and SO MANY of them are excellent to amazing quality, why even take the risk with Nikon? Just pass them by.
I'm not saying this is a good deal but you clearly hate Nikon a truly unhealthy amount my guy,.
1
1
Jan 8, 2026 3:41 PM
7.6K Comments
Joined Dec 2006
big mikeJan 8, 2026 3:41 PM
7.6K Comments
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 View quoted comment :
I'd be much more careful about lenses. There are plenty of lenses that can be damaged or just not work, depending on the F-mount body you put them on. It's absolutely NOT "just put it on and it'll work". Been burned enough times with Nikon to not want to mess with them.

edit: I wanted to get a "Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Lens"...and I had a Nikon D300 camera. Spent the extra dollerydoos for a modern camera, and it had all the compatibility. Screw-drive motor linkages and whatnot.

Nope. AF-P, even with it being for crop sensor, doesn't work on the D300. Because reasons.

Whereas with Canon, you have EF mount. Comes in two flavors -- EF full frame and EF-S crop sensor. That's it. The earliest lenses from the mid-1980s EF-mount film cameras work without issue even on the last EF-mount DSLRs produced. Sure, there might be one or two exceptions -- but they're a rarity, usually reserved for half-baked third party lenses, and you can count them on one hand with fingers to spare.

With Sony, it's even better. E-mount. Bam. There's crop sensor and full-frame, but pretty much any E-mount camera will take either type and adjust accordingly.

Nikon? Break out the secret decoder ring! There's some ancient F-mount manual lenses that will break if you put them on the wrong camera style, because reasons.

When there are SO MANY other camera manufacturers out there with SO MANY lenses to choose from -- and SO MANY of them are excellent to amazing quality, why even take the risk with Nikon? Just pass them by.
Now that you've edited your post to include the information that tells me what I expected was true, you're mad at Nikon because of user error.
The lens instruction manual says right in it "Note: DX lenses are for use with Nikon DX-format digital single-lens reflex cameras. This lens does not support D4-series, D3-series, D2-series, D1-series,D800-series, D700, D610, D600, D300-series, D200, D100, D90, D80, D70-series, D60, D50, D40-series, D7000, D5100, D5000, D3200, D3100 or D3000 digital SLR cameras or film SLR cameras. When using it with a D5500, D5300, or D3300, be sure the camera firmware has been updated to the latest version."
Or you could read page 350 of your cameras user manual, note AF-P isn't listed, and wonder why that is and look into it.
Or not expect a 10 year old camera to work with brand new lenses.
And failing all of that, you couldn't just, I dunno, return it and be slightly miffed instead of acting like Nikon ate your baby?
1
2

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 8, 2026 9:58 PM
5.2K Comments
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Jan 8, 2026 9:58 PM
5.2K Comments
Quote from big mike View quoted comment :
Now that you've edited your post to include the information that tells me what I expected was true, you're mad at Nikon because of user error.
The lens instruction manual says right in it "Note: DX lenses are for use with Nikon DX-format digital single-lens reflex cameras. This lens does not support D4-series, D3-series, D2-series, D1-series,D800-series, D700, D610, D600, D300-series, D200, D100, D90, D80, D70-series, D60, D50, D40-series, D7000, D5100, D5000, D3200, D3100 or D3000 digital SLR cameras or film SLR cameras. When using it with a D5500, D5300, or D3300, be sure the camera firmware has been updated to the latest version."
Or you could read page 350 of your cameras user manual, note AF-P isn't listed, and wonder why that is and look into it.
Or not expect a 10 year old camera to work with brand new lenses.
And failing all of that, you couldn't just, I dunno, return it and be slightly miffed instead of acting like Nikon ate your baby?
And if you read what I wrote, you know that NO OTHER CAMERA MANUFACTURER needs this secret decoder ring for lens compatibility! It pretty much comes down to "is it the same mount? is it crop vs full? (and for some companies crop vs full isn't even an issue, since it'll auto-adjust!)" All good? Great!

Woosh! 🤣
Last edited by LavenderPickle7682 January 8, 2026 at 03:57 PM.
3
Jan 9, 2026 12:42 PM
7.6K Comments
Joined Dec 2006
big mikeJan 9, 2026 12:42 PM
7.6K Comments
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 View quoted comment :
And if you read what I wrote, you know that NO OTHER CAMERA MANUFACTURER needs this secret decoder ring for lens compatibility! It pretty much comes down to "is it the same mount? is it crop vs full? (and for some companies crop vs full isn't even an issue, since it'll auto-adjust!)" All good? Great!

Woosh! 🤣
And no other manufacturer offered nearly as wide or long of a comparability of single camera mount. Your ignorance doesn't make it a bad product.
1
1
Jan 9, 2026 1:13 PM
5.2K Comments
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Jan 9, 2026 1:13 PM
5.2K Comments
Quote from big mike View quoted comment :
And no other manufacturer offered nearly as wide or long of a comparability of single camera mount. Your ignorance doesn't make it a bad product.
I can plop on a lens made in 1986 for a film camera on a DSLR body made in 2016. It's called the Canon EF system, you should look into it -- it's pretty rad. The only real "hiccup" is the crop sensor version (EF-S) physically can't be mounted on full frame (but the reverse is fine, you can mount EF full frame onto crop sensor bodies without issue).

Pretty much no other compatibility issue, aside from some third-party budget lens shenanigans you can count on one hand. And speaking of third party, whoo boy daddy, there are TONS to choose from -- budget and high end. Some of those Sigma lenses really gave Canon a run for their money.

And EF was so common, it's considered the universal lens mount donor. Pretty much every other lens mount has an adapter to use an EF lens on that body...some with full controls, most with partial/manual.

Notice I didn't say a thing about different camera models here. That's because it's forward-backwards compatible. But hey, keep enjoying your Nikons needing a CrackerJack decoder ring full of obtuse exceptions!

-----

And if you think that's great, just look into Sony's E-mount. It makes Canon's EF lens selection seem paltry by comparison! And that's still being used today. Isn't it nice when your glass holds value, instead of dropping like a rock when the "next new model" comes out and has a whole new compatibility layer (*cough NIKON cough*)?
1
3
Jan 9, 2026 2:37 PM
7.6K Comments
Joined Dec 2006
big mikeJan 9, 2026 2:37 PM
7.6K Comments
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 View quoted comment :
I can plop on a lens made in 1986 for a film camera on a DSLR body made in 2016. It's called the Canon EF system, you should look into it -- it's pretty rad. The only real "hiccup" is the crop sensor version (EF-S) physically can't be mounted on full frame (but the reverse is fine, you can mount EF full frame onto crop sensor bodies without issue).

Pretty much no other compatibility issue, aside from some third-party budget lens shenanigans you can count on one hand. And speaking of third party, whoo boy daddy, there are TONS to choose from -- budget and high end. Some of those Sigma lenses really gave Canon a run for their money.

And EF was so common, it's considered the universal lens mount donor. Pretty much every other lens mount has an adapter to use an EF lens on that body...some with full controls, most with partial/manual.

Notice I didn't say a thing about different camera models here. That's because it's forward-backwards compatible. But hey, keep enjoying your Nikons needing a CrackerJack decoder ring full of obtuse exceptions!

-----

And if you think that's great, just look into Sony's E-mount. It makes Canon's EF lens selection seem paltry by comparison! And that's still being used today. Isn't it nice when your glass holds value, instead of dropping like a rock when the "next new model" comes out and has a whole new compatibility layer (*cough NIKON cough*)?
Nikon has been making F mount since the 1950s, and in some way shape or form most of those lenses can be used forwards and slightly less so backwards to today. EF was introduced in 1987 and threw away completely the previous FD mount, find some old timer Canon users and I bet they'll be a lot less gung-ho about that change and compatibility in the brand. So once again, sorry you had a bad experience, but it was avoidable, and self inflicted. Your opinions on how lens compatibility should work are just that, your opinions.
Last edited by big mike January 9, 2026 at 06:39 AM.
1
2
Jan 9, 2026 5:30 PM
5.2K Comments
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Jan 9, 2026 5:30 PM
5.2K Comments
Quote from big mike View quoted comment :
Nikon has been making F mount since the 1950s, and in some way shape or form most of those lenses can be used forwards and slightly less so backwards to today. EF was introduced in 1987 and threw away completely the previous FD mount, find some old timer Canon users and I bet they'll be a lot less gung-ho about that change and compatibility in the brand. So once again, sorry you had a bad experience, but it was avoidable, and self inflicted. Your opinions on how lens compatibility should work are just that, your opinions.
How much Nikon stock do you own? You seem to love defending them! 🤣
2
Jan 25, 2026 4:30 PM
39 Comments
Joined Dec 2012
OldBooneJan 25, 2026 4:30 PM
39 Comments
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 View quoted comment :
I'd be much more careful about lenses. There are plenty of lenses that can be damaged or just not work, depending on the F-mount body you put them on. It's absolutely NOT "just put it on and it'll work". Been burned enough times with Nikon to not want to mess with them.

edit: I wanted to get a "Nikon AF-P DX NIKKOR 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Lens"...and I had a Nikon D300 camera. Spent the extra dollerydoos for a modern camera, and it had all the compatibility. Screw-drive motor linkages and whatnot.

Nope. AF-P, even with it being for crop sensor, doesn't work on the D300. Because reasons.

Whereas with Canon, you have EF mount. Comes in two flavors -- EF full frame and EF-S crop sensor. That's it. The earliest lenses from the mid-1980s EF-mount film cameras work without issue even on the last EF-mount DSLRs produced. Sure, there might be one or two exceptions -- but they're a rarity, usually reserved for half-baked third party lenses, and you can count them on one hand with fingers to spare.

With Sony, it's even better. E-mount. Bam. There's crop sensor and full-frame, but pretty much any E-mount camera will take either type and adjust accordingly.

Nikon? Break out the secret decoder ring! There's some ancient F-mount manual lenses that will break if you put them on the wrong camera style, because reasons.

When there are SO MANY other camera manufacturers out there with SO MANY lenses to choose from -- and SO MANY of them are excellent to amazing quality, why even take the risk with Nikon? Just pass them by.
Maybe photography isn't your thing...stick to gopros or something
1

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!