Amazon[amazon.com] has 4-Oz Tom's of Maine Whiten Plus Coconut Oil Fluoride Free Toothpaste for $5.42 - $2.43 when you 'clip' the coupon on product page - 5% when you check out via Subscribe & Save = $2.72. Shipping is free with Prime or on $35+ orders.
Price $3.27 lower (55% savings) than the list price of $5.99
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Amazon[amazon.com] has 4-Oz Tom's of Maine Whiten Plus Coconut Oil Fluoride Free Toothpaste for $5.42 - $2.43 when you 'clip' the coupon on product page - 5% when you check out via Subscribe & Save = $2.72. Shipping is free with Prime or on $35+ orders.
Price $3.27 lower (55% savings) than the list price of $5.99
Toothpaste should definitely have fluoride. That along with unfiltered tap water would provide the appropriate dosage to help avoid cavities which is more important the older you get. And no it doesn't make you into a zombie or give you autism or whatever is the new belief these days.
Toothpaste should definitely have fluoride. That along with unfiltered tap water would provide the appropriate dosage to help avoid cavities which is more important the older you get. And no it doesn't make you into a zombie or give you autism or whatever is the new belief these days.
These guys concluded in their studies "fluoride is presumed to be a cognitive developmental hazard to humans". You can agree to disagree with science, but don't tell people that they are out of their minds when scientist disagree with your opinion.https://www.nationalacademies.org...BEST-20-03
These guys concluded in their studies "fluoride is presumed to be a cognitive developmental hazard to humans". You can agree to disagree with science, but don't tell people that they are out of their minds when scientist disagree with your opinion.https://www.nationalacademies.org...BEST-20-03
Damn you didn't even bother reading your own pasted link and started spreading misinformation. Do you know what "presume" means? Below is part of the conclusion from the article you posted -
As noted above, the committee focused on determining whether the evidence as presented in the revised monograph supported NTP's main conclusion that "fluoride is presumed to be a cognitive neurodevelopmental hazard to humans" (NTP 2020a, p. 80). The revised monograph is much improved from the initial draft that the committee reviewed. The addition of the meta-analysis substantially increases the support for NTP's main conclusion. However, the committee is still concerned about the presentation of the data, the methods, and the analyses in the revised monograph and finds that the monograph falls short of providing a clear and convincing argument that supports its assessment. The committee urges NTP to improve the clarity of the document. The monograph has great importance in the discussion about effects of fluoride on neurodevelopmental and cognitive health effects and will likely influence exposure guidelines or regulations. Thus, it is extremely important for it to be able to withstand scientific scrutiny by those who have vastly different opinions on the risks and benefits associated with fluoride exposure. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Review of the Revised NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/3623.
5
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
10 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As noted above, the committee focused on determining whether the evidence as presented in the revised monograph supported NTP's main conclusion that "fluoride is presumed to be a cognitive neurodevelopmental hazard to humans" (NTP 2020a, p. 80). The revised monograph is much improved from the initial draft that the committee reviewed. The addition of the meta-analysis substantially increases the support for NTP's main conclusion. However, the committee is still concerned about the presentation of the data, the methods, and the analyses in the revised monograph and finds that the monograph falls short of providing a clear and convincing argument that supports its assessment. The committee urges NTP to improve the clarity of the document. The monograph has great importance in the discussion about effects of fluoride on neurodevelopmental and cognitive health effects and will likely influence exposure guidelines or regulations. Thus, it is extremely important for it to be able to withstand scientific scrutiny by those who have vastly different opinions on the risks and benefits associated with fluoride exposure. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Review of the Revised NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects: A Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/3623.
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!