This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
I have the 50 inch version, and it works great. Tested it with 144hz 4K from my pc l. Just make sure to use the second HDMI port and not the first. Your pc also needs to support it. It's a bit lame I overpaid by 80$( both sizes dropped in price ) , but it's an awesome tv
This 55 inch Philips is mainly a budget 4K gaming TV that can double as a large PC display, with strong value at $218 and generally good text clarity. The refresh rate is real on some setups, with 144Hz working over HDMI 2 for 4K PC use, and the software feels solid. Brightness is better than the spec suggests, but HDR is not worth chasing because there is no local dimming and the panel can struggle with reflections and dark uniformity. HDMI 2.1 is missing, and some setups only get 144Hz at 1080p or fail to reach 120 and 144Hz at all.
PC gamers using a 4K desktop setup, because HDMI 2 can deliver 144Hz and text clarity stays good for everyday monitor use.
The TV may depend on internet connectivity, raising privacy concerns about data and telemetry.
Common Questions (5)
Yes, it can run 4K at 144Hz from a PC, and HDMI 2 is the port that worked for multiple setups. The PC also has to support 4K/144Hz; one report says 144Hz is only available at 1080p on some units, so compatibility may vary.
It can work well as a large gaming monitor, with good text clarity and strong value for the price. The main caveats are that HDR is not worth using, there is no local dimming, and some units may show edge light bleed or inconsistent high-refresh behavior.
Brightness is reported as better than the 350-nit spec suggests, and SDR gaming looks solid for the price. Black levels are acceptable for a basic LED TV, but HDR is limited by the lack of local dimming and some panels show dim spots or edge bleed.
It should still function as a TV without constant internet, but the Google smart-TV software may push online features and telemetry concerns remain. If privacy is a priority, the practical concern is the smart platform rather than basic display operation.
Got mine in today. I'm a screen snob and I just had to see what 144hz panel at 218 bucks looked like and hot damn. Good ass tv for 218 bucks. It's brighter than I expected/what the specs would allude. I had no problem getting to 144hz right off the bat on hdmi 2. Haven't tried hdmi 1 or 3. There's too many different settings menus, which is just a TV thing at this point- but it mostly worked out the box. INSANE VALUE provided it lasts 2+ years. I'm using it as a part time computer monitor (I have a desk with other monitors i use during work hours/specific games) and am typing on it now and the text is good- chroma 444 subsampling and all that. Disable dynamic brightness/contrast. The brightness setting actually works fairly well but the dynamic contrast is big bad. Sound is not great, but cmon. Might be a bit of backlight lottery as I'm seeing a couple dim spots but nothing that alters the picture. Darks are supposed to be a sorespot but they seem fine for your avg run of the mill LED screen.
Overall this is a stupid good looking pc/game screen. The refresh rate is real.
If you keep your expectations reasonable. It's a fine 4K 144hz gaming screen. Don't bother with HDR. It doesn't have local dimming but get an led light strip for the back of it as that will make the black levels look better in the dark.
Again for $218. A 55" 4K SDR 144hz screen is still fantastic for gaming. The HDR is a gimmick on this as not enough nits to make it worth it
For those of you that thought you missed the deal, be very happy. My panel has terrible light bleeding throughout the edges. 120 and 144hz isn't working on any inputs.
1
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
Community Reviews
This 55 inch Philips is mainly a budget 4K gaming TV that can double as a large PC display, with strong value at $218 and generally good text clarity. The refresh rate is real on some setups, with 144Hz working over HDMI 2 for 4K PC use, and the software feels solid. Brightness is better than the spec suggests, but HDR is not worth chasing because there is no local dimming and the panel can struggle with reflections and dark uniformity. HDMI 2.1 is missing, and some setups only get 144Hz at 1080p or fail to reach 120 and 144Hz at all.
The TV can reach 144Hz 4K from a PC when using the second HDMI port and when the PC supports it.
The TV delivers stronger-than-expected brightness for the price, which helps gaming visibility on a large panel.
The TV can function as a large gaming monitor for PC gaming and arcade or racing sim setups.
The text clarity is good for PC use, and dynamic brightness or contrast can be disabled for better results.
The TV setup is manageable because the unit is not particularly heavy, and the software experience is described as very good.
The TV's brightness specification of 350 nits may be low for a large 55-inch panel.
The TV can struggle with reflections when a bright window is behind the viewer.
Some units can show significant edge light bleeding, and 120Hz or 144Hz may fail to work on any inputs.
The TV may depend on internet connectivity, raising privacy concerns about data and telemetry.
Common Questions (5)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
37 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Overall this is a stupid good looking pc/game screen. The refresh rate is real.
Again for $218. A 55" 4K SDR 144hz screen is still fantastic for gaming. The HDR is a gimmick on this as not enough nits to make it worth it
Nice. Do you know how much the 50" version weighs by chance?
Very good software too.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!