This sleek 3-port USB-C charger offers total output of 160W (up to 140W single port output charge) powered by a smart charging real-time touchscreen control in an AirPods-compact size design
Charger device only/non battery & cables are not included
Product is eligible for refund/replacement within 30-days of purchase
Offer valid promotional price/supplies last
Additional Details
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
This sleek 3-port USB-C charger offers total output of 160W (up to 140W single port output charge) powered by a smart charging real-time touchscreen control in an AirPods-compact size design
Charger device only/non battery & cables are not included
Product is eligible for refund/replacement within 30-days of purchase
Offer valid promotional price/supplies last
Additional Details
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more
I bought and returned this charger. It gets ridiculously hot, even with ZERO load on the charger. Anker blamed it on the bluetooth chip inside and wanted me to disable it, but I don't know of any other bluetooth that runs that hot.
For those buying this JUST for the 140W capability, the specs show on 120V it only runs for 1 hr @ 140W then "derates" to a lower amount.
Personally, I would not want to be the person in the airplane seat next to anyone using 140W continuous on their laptop.
I would if it didn't drop the USB-A port from the 140w.I fly for work at least once a month, so a single compact charger for laptop, phone, etc. that has enough wattage to charge quickly AND/OR run a GPU is a big deal for me.
Have this for a couple of months and it is great imo. It's expensive but for my needs I think I'm satisfied. I've moved almost all my devices to C and for travel, I have a passthrough battery bank that has an A port if I have anything that requires A. Screen certainly is a gimmick, but I mean it's somewhat useful if you're curious I suppose. I tested it with a USB cable that displays wattage and it was relatively accurate.
If you just ignore that you're paying a premium for smaller size for the Anker one, than sure. If size doesn't matter than the baseus one is a good price for a 140w charger. That's exactly what I said.[/QUOTE] The baseus is also GaN despite not having it in the product title, so it's small as well.
If you just ignore that you're paying a premium for smaller size for the Anker one, than sure. If size doesn't matter than the baseus one is a good price for a 140w charger. That's exactly what I said.
The baseus is also GaN despite not having it in the product title, so it's small as well.[/QUOTE]Yes, It's "small" but bigger than the Anker. Half an inch on a power brick matters when you're packing a carry on. You're paying for the smallest size possible with the Anker, not to mention actual customer service and reliability vs baseus.
Both Gann chargers of mine died after 2 years staying plugged, 1 Ugreen 65W and 1 Chinese OEM 140W. They both get hot every usages so I would say these tiny chargers are for convenience not for longevity.
Usually love Anker products and bought 2 of these for traveling with multiple laptops, and even with 5-10 watts the thing gets warm! Why so warm at minimal usage?
Dynamic power allocation. Nearly all chargers with multiple ports don't allocate power amongst the ports based on the actual power needs of the devices plugged in. Ex. a 140w charger will default to splitting the power for two ports to 70w each when two devices are plugged in even if one device can only charge at 5w while the other device can charge at 100w.
So only worth it if you actually routinely plug in multiple devices and want to maximize 160w charging across all three (although this brick will throttle eventually at speeds above 150w). Easily my favorite charging brick right now.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
Personally, I would not want to be the person in the airplane seat next to anyone using 140W continuous on their laptop.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
45 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://mokinglobal.com/products/...9243545904
so this would be a no-brainer for that market. $100 isn't a big deal for many techies.
https://mokinglobal.com/products/...9243545904
https://mokinglobal.com/products/...9243545904
2 for $56 shipped is still a great deal, even if you have to wait a week or two.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
2 for $56 shipped is still a great deal, even if you have to wait a week or two.
Here's one for $36 Lol
https://a.co/d/05YMx5Qi
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Really comes down to two things:
- Size, smaller than any 140w+ charger out there
- Dynamic power allocation. Nearly all chargers with multiple ports don't allocate power amongst the ports based on the actual power needs of the devices plugged in. Ex. a 140w charger will default to splitting the power for two ports to 70w each when two devices are plugged in even if one device can only charge at 5w while the other device can charge at 100w.
So only worth it if you actually routinely plug in multiple devices and want to maximize 160w charging across all three (although this brick will throttle eventually at speeds above 150w). Easily my favorite charging brick right now.Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!