Amazon has
25.4oz. Splenda Sugar Free Flavored Liquid Syrup (French Vanilla) on sale for $3.02 - 5% ($0.15) when you check out via Subscribe & Save =
$2.87.
Shipping is free with Prime or $35+ orders.
Alternatively,
Walmart has
25.4oz. Splenda Sugar Free Flavored Liquid Syrup (French Vanilla) on clearance for
$3.02.
Shipping is free with Walmart+ (
free 30-day trial) or on orders of $35+.
Thanks to Deal Hunter
phoinix for finding this deal.
Note, you have the flexibility to manage your
Subscribe & Save subscription at any time after your order ships. View
Subscribe & Save filler items and our
current Subscribe & Save Frontpage deals to unlock up to extra 15% savings when you have 5 or more items in your current monthly subscription.
Product must be sold/shipped by Amazon or Walmart respectively
Top Comments
People love to mention this every time there's a product with erythritol. One study, a while back, that studied BLOOD erythritol (something our bodies produce naturally) and not dietary erythritol like in this product. It basically said that higher blood erythritol was more prone to heat disease and stroke. Guess what makes your body produce more natural blood erythritol? Heart disease. So basically the study concluded that someone with heart disease is more prone to a heart attack or stroke. Go figure....
Community Reviews
This French Vanilla coffee syrup is mainly about low price and sugar free sweetness for coffee, but the ingredient mix matters. The formula is described as containing erythritol and sucralose, with some notes that Splenda products also rely on fillers like dextrin and maltodextrin. Taste is the biggest drawback, with the French Vanilla flavor called weak and the erythritol aftertaste and cooling effect standing out. Health concerns around erythritol also come up, though the comments do not agree on how serious those risks are, making it a budget option with some baggage.
Coffee drinkers who want a strong sweetener, because it sweetens effectively in coffee and a little goes a long way.
People who prefer erythritol-based sweeteners, because the formula uses erythritol with sucralose instead of pure sucralose.
Shoppers comparing sugar-free syrups by flavor, because the French vanilla taste can be a poor fit versus other brands.
People who react badly to erythritol, because it can cause heart palpitations, rapid heartbeat, or a cooling aftertaste.
Shoppers wanting a pure sucralose syrup, because this formula includes erythritol and fillers instead of only sucralose.
Buyers avoiding sugar alcohols for gut comfort, because erythritol can cause digestive issues beyond moderate intake.
Common Questions (5)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
45 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Erythritol is used because it's 70% as sweet as sugar and much easier to work with for the average person especially in the powder form. What would you have used instead since pure sucralose is next to impossible to work with being as sweet as it is?
But even the Splenda packets aren't pure sucralose or anything close to it. I bet something like 99.5% of those packets are maltodextrin and dextrose. A very small percentage of it is actually sucralose.
With that said, i'm within the normal BMI and work out regularly too. No health problems at all. I use products with erythritol regularly in recipes and have no side effects from it at all.
But if it doesn't agree with you, use a different product. It's that simple. Still perfectly safe in moderation.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Again, you claim these are perfectly safe and you have no real world longevity studies to back that statement. These fake sugars are practically brand new when it comes to food science. The real answer is we don't know yet.
Again, you claim these are perfectly safe and you have no real world longevity studies to back that statement. These fake sugars are practically brand new when it comes to food science. The real answer is we don't know yet.
These artificial sweeteners have been around for decades. There have been more studies on them deeming them safe (safe, not healthy) than I can count. They don't cause heart attacks and strokes in otherwise healthy people. This has been proven over and over again. Saying otherwise is just spreading typical internet BS. No different than all the seed oil nonsense being spread around too. The internet is a cesspool for this kind of stuff.
These artificial sweeteners have been around for decades. There have been more studies on them deeming them safe (safe, not healthy) than I can count. They don't cause heart attacks and strokes in otherwise healthy people. This has been proven over and over again. Saying otherwise is just spreading typical internet BS. No different than all the seed oil nonsense being spread around too. The internet is a cesspool for this kind of stuff.
There is also no scientific proof that sugar free stuff is BETTER alternative than sugar but that doesn't stop the beverage companies from marketing that zero sugar is better alternative despite not saying outright. There is guy at my work loves to drink zero sugar stuff. He took the beverage companies' hook, line, and sinker by saying, "but these have no sugar' which implies that he was told zero stuff is better alternative but in reality, there is no such thing as healthier soda and saying healthier soda is like saying smoking light cigarettes can reduce your chance of heart diseases and lung cancer.
Anyone that drinks soda, in any form that thinks it's a "healthy" option, has no clue what "healthy" is. Diet soda, in moderation, is a safe option. Water is a healthy option. Regardless, why are you even using this person as an example to prove your point? Random anecdotal evidence means next to nothing.
Anyone that drinks soda, in any form that thinks it's a "healthy" option, has no clue what "healthy" is. Diet soda, in moderation, is a safe option. Water is a healthy option. Regardless, why are you even using this person as an example to prove your point? Random anecdotal evidence means next to nothing.
Overwhelming majority of the consumable products are safe, some in moderation. That's implied otherwise, people wouldn't buy them. Why are more people suddenly consuming zero sugar stuff? Because these companies were able to market that consuming zero sugar products are "healthier" than sugar stuff. My example isn't random. Look at the sale data of zero sugar drinks. Coca Cola said last quarter that zero sugar drinks sales were extremely pleasing.
So i'm in agreement with you here. My issue is more with the people saying by consuming erythritol, you're going to have a heart attack or stroke based on one bogus study that never even studied dietary erythritol. It's constantly regurgitated here every time some artificial sweetener product is trending and it's complete internet nonsense.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!