Item 1 of 5
Item 1 of 5
populartDames | Staff posted Jul 28, 2026 5:34 PM
(Refurbished) RayNeo Air 3s 201" 120Hz FHD AR/XR Glasses $130.40 + Free Shipping
$130
$179
27% off
eBay
eBayDeal Details
RayNeo Official Store via eBay [ebay.com] has (Certified Refurbished) RayNeo Air 3s 201" 120Hz FHD AR/XR Glasses on sale for $163 - 20% off when you apply promo code NEWFINDS20 at checkout = $130.40. Shipping is free.
Note: This item has a 2-year warranty serviced by Allstate.
Note: This item has a 2-year warranty serviced by Allstate.
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
RayNeo Official Store via eBay [ebay.com] has (Certified Refurbished) RayNeo Air 3s 201" 120Hz FHD AR/XR Glasses on sale for $163 - 20% off when you apply promo code NEWFINDS20 at checkout = $130.40. Shipping is free.
Note: This item has a 2-year warranty serviced by Allstate.
Note: This item has a 2-year warranty serviced by Allstate.
Community Voting
Deal
Score
+10
Good Deal
Bad Deal
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
15 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank UniqueLeopard361
If you're not familiar with these types of glasses, they are display glasses that connect over USB C, just like the portable monitors. So your devices have to be compatible with USB C with Alt DP.
Note: For the Nintendo Switch 1/2 you need special charging adapters to play on the glasses as Nintendo uses a proprietary protocol.
Also note that if you intend to watch 3D content on it you need to have 3D FSBS/HSBS files. The glasses want FSBS, but with VLC media player on iOS/Android, and PotPlayer on Windows you can watch HSBS files on the glasses in full screen 3D.
Also note that so far none of the Pixel phones are compatible with 3D although they work for general use with the glasses.
Now for the differences between the 3 models I mentioned.
3S (current post):
Very decent glasses. A lot of people like the hardshell case. There are some issues with internal reflections, and corners of the screen can get cut off. But can be doable for a decent amount of people.
3S Pro:
Very little internal reflections. Screen fits into view very easily. Slightly uncomfortable on right side arm after a little while. Comes with a cloth case that I personally like a lot, but many people seem to dislike.
4 Pro:
OSD menu is a little better. Comes with HDR compatibility, but kind of useless on phones if you're trying to get true HDR. Your host device has to support it. AI HDR can be an enjoyable gimmick. Same cloth case. Very difficult to get all four corners in view. Many people in the community have resorted to nosepad modifications to get it to work. For some people it seems to be fine though. Not for me unfortunately. The RayNeo app is not needed, but with the 4 Pro if you want to try out their experimental AI 2D to 3D video conversion I think you need the 4 Pro. But otherwise there's not too much that's different.
So my personal recommendation is the 3S Pro.
If you're not familiar with these types of glasses, they are display glasses that connect over USB C, just like the portable monitors. So your devices have to be compatible with USB C with Alt DP.
Note: For the Nintendo Switch 1/2 you need special charging adapters to play on the glasses as Nintendo uses a proprietary protocol.
Also note that if you intend to watch 3D content on it you need to have 3D FSBS/HSBS files. The glasses want FSBS, but with VLC media player on iOS/Android, and PotPlayer on Windows you can watch HSBS files on the glasses in full screen 3D.
Also note that so far none of the Pixel phones are compatible with 3D although they work for general use with the glasses.
Now for the differences between the 3 models I mentioned.
3S (current post):
Very decent glasses. A lot of people like the hardshell case. There are some issues with internal reflections, and corners of the screen can get cut off. But can be doable for a decent amount of people.
3S Pro:
Very little internal reflections. Screen fits into view very easily. Slightly uncomfortable on right side arm after a little while. Comes with a cloth case that I personally like a lot, but many people seem to dislike.
4 Pro:
OSD menu is a little better. Comes with HDR compatibility, but kind of useless on phones if you're trying to get true HDR. Your host device has to support it. AI HDR can be an enjoyable gimmick. Same cloth case. Very difficult to get all four corners in view. Many people in the community have resorted to nosepad modifications to get it to work. For some people it seems to be fine though. Not for me unfortunately. The RayNeo app is not needed, but with the 4 Pro if you want to try out their experimental AI 2D to 3D video conversion I think you need the 4 Pro. But otherwise there's not too much that's different.
So my personal recommendation is the 3S Pro.
For the screen size a couple things matter. One is what you're connecting. If it's your phone, then the phone can limit the screen size due to having a different aspect ratio. Also mobile apps for tv shows and movies can be formatted in a way that looks small even when enlarged.
Better way to watch is to connect to a laptop, or if you have a Samsung phone, connect in DeX mode. DeX mode apps use the full screen and reformat the TV apps to have subtitles not take up such a large part of the screen. On iPhones connect over wired airplay.
The other thing is sitting in front of a wall at a far enough distance like you would for a tv. When there's some light and you can see the wall a bit, you can feel the effect.
There are exceptions and some people cannot see this illusion so it ruins the experience for them.
I usually don't feel the 200 in thing though. In my experience it's more like between 80-120 in depending on where I'm watching. Occasionally like 32 inches if I'm too close to something.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It's very close to the 3S Pro. The RayNeo screen is slightly bigger. Other than that not much difference. You don't have a menu on the Viture glasses, but the functions are mostly the same. I think to switch to 120Hz mode you need to use Spacewalker on your phone or Windows. But phones don't support 120Hz output anyway.
There's other cool glasses but they cost a lot more.
Idk if people can actually see properly with any of the Luma series. At 1200p being even taller, the top or bottom portion gets cut off for most of the posts I've seen.
The display is among the best from what I've heard though in terms of brightness, color and sharpeness.
If you went with the XBX, the screen is larger than the RayNeo but less sharp. Though the larger fov is supposed to feel more immersive. Sharpness I mean in terms of text. It doesn't have 3dof like the One series, but stabilization for quick head movement. And they are the lightest.
At your current budget I wouldn't say it's worth it. And the Luma might not be worth the risk. Unless you can go to Best buy first and are able to try them out. They've been showing up in displays now. If it's a match only then is it worth it.
Otherwise keep the Pro XR or switch to the 3S Pro. Currently there are trade offs at every pricing level. The Luma was supposed to be where Viture blew away the competition, but in their rush I think they messed up the execution just enough to make them hit or miss.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I'm thinking the sweet spots around $260 for the XBX's by Christmas time. Yea I can wait til then with a pro dock carefully stashed in its rightful place in a drawer somewhere I'll never remember
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!