(Refurbished) RayNeo Air 3s 201" 120Hz FHD AR/XR Glasses $130.40 + Free Shipping

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Jul 28, 2026 7:00 PM

412 Comments

Joined Nov 2020

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Jul 28, 2026 7:00 PM

412 Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank UniqueLeopard361

I'd pay $40 more for the 3S Pro. I had the opportunity to try out the 3S/3S Pro/4 Rpo, and for me the 3S Pro was the sweet spot.

If you're not familiar with these types of glasses, they are display glasses that connect over USB C, just like the portable monitors. So your devices have to be compatible with USB C with Alt DP.

Note: For the Nintendo Switch 1/2 you need special charging adapters to play on the glasses as Nintendo uses a proprietary protocol.

Also note that if you intend to watch 3D content on it you need to have 3D FSBS/HSBS files. The glasses want FSBS, but with VLC media player on iOS/Android, and PotPlayer on Windows you can watch HSBS files on the glasses in full screen 3D.

Also note that so far none of the Pixel phones are compatible with 3D although they work for general use with the glasses.

Now for the differences between the 3 models I mentioned.

3S (current post):
Very decent glasses. A lot of people like the hardshell case. There are some issues with internal reflections, and corners of the screen can get cut off. But can be doable for a decent amount of people.

3S Pro:
Very little internal reflections. Screen fits into view very easily. Slightly uncomfortable on right side arm after a little while. Comes with a cloth case that I personally like a lot, but many people seem to dislike.

4 Pro:
OSD menu is a little better. Comes with HDR compatibility, but kind of useless on phones if you're trying to get true HDR. Your host device has to support it. AI HDR can be an enjoyable gimmick. Same cloth case. Very difficult to get all four corners in view. Many people in the community have resorted to nosepad modifications to get it to work. For some people it seems to be fine though. Not for me unfortunately. The RayNeo app is not needed, but with the 4 Pro if you want to try out their experimental AI 2D to 3D video conversion I think you need the 4 Pro. But otherwise there's not too much that's different.

So my personal recommendation is the 3S Pro.

2

3

dvdapex

Jul 28, 2026 9:05 PM

1.7K Comments

Joined Oct 2007

dvdapexJul 28, 2026 9:05 PM

1.7K Comments

Quote from UniqueLeopard361

:

I'd pay $40 more for the 3S Pro. I had the opportunity to try out the 3S/3S Pro/4 Rpo, and for me the 3S Pro was the sweet spot.

If you're not familiar with these types of glasses, they are display glasses that connect over USB C, just like the portable monitors. So your devices have to be compatible with USB C with Alt DP.

Note: For the Nintendo Switch 1/2 you need special charging adapters to play on the glasses as Nintendo uses a proprietary protocol.

Also note that if you intend to watch 3D content on it you need to have 3D FSBS/HSBS files. The glasses want FSBS, but with VLC media player on iOS/Android, and PotPlayer on Windows you can watch HSBS files on the glasses in full screen 3D.

Also note that so far none of the Pixel phones are compatible with 3D although they work for general use with the glasses.

Now for the differences between the 3 models I mentioned.

3S (current post):
Very decent glasses. A lot of people like the hardshell case. There are some issues with internal reflections, and corners of the screen can get cut off. But can be doable for a decent amount of people.

3S Pro:
Very little internal reflections. Screen fits into view very easily. Slightly uncomfortable on right side arm after a little while. Comes with a cloth case that I personally like a lot, but many people seem to dislike.

4 Pro:
OSD menu is a little better. Comes with HDR compatibility, but kind of useless on phones if you're trying to get true HDR. Your host device has to support it. AI HDR can be an enjoyable gimmick. Same cloth case. Very difficult to get all four corners in view. Many people in the community have resorted to nosepad modifications to get it to work. For some people it seems to be fine though. Not for me unfortunately. The RayNeo app is not needed, but with the 4 Pro if you want to try out their experimental AI 2D to 3D video conversion I think you need the 4 Pro. But otherwise there's not too much that's different.

So my personal recommendation is the 3S Pro.

Thanks for the detailed information. I tried the 4 Pro (and have never tried any other version or brand of these types of glasses) and it was so underwhelming. The lower 5% - 10% was cut off, they made my ears feel hot afterwards, and instead of feeling like I was watching a 202" screen, it felt like I was watching a 40" tv from 10 feet away. I *really* wanted to like these, but they would have to work hard to be meh. I feel now like all of the glowing reddit posts about the 4 Pro are just shill posts and there are more negative, neutral aspects than wow-positive ones.

1

OopsMyDeals

Jul 28, 2026 9:43 PM

356 Comments

Joined Nov 2009

OopsMyDealsJul 28, 2026 9:43 PM

356 Comments

For folks with glasses will these be a problem?

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Jul 28, 2026 10:40 PM

412 Comments

Joined Nov 2020

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Jul 28, 2026 10:40 PM

412 Comments

Quote from OopsMyDeals

:

For folks with glasses will these be a problem?

Yes. You can get prescription lenses from somewhere like HonsVR. But without them, depending on how severe your prescription is, you won't be able to see clearly.

1

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Jul 28, 2026 10:48 PM

412 Comments

Joined Nov 2020

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Jul 28, 2026 10:48 PM

412 Comments

Quote from dvdapex

:

Thanks for the detailed information. I tried the 4 Pro (and have never tried any other version or brand of these types of glasses) and it was so underwhelming. The lower 5% - 10% was cut off, they made my ears feel hot afterwards, and instead of feeling like I was watching a 202" screen, it felt like I was watching a 40" tv from 10 feet away. I *really* wanted to like these, but they would have to work hard to be meh. I feel now like all of the glowing reddit posts about the 4 Pro are just shill posts and there are more negative, neutral aspects than wow-positive ones.

Idk about the ear thing, but the lower part being cutoff makes sense. They include other nose pieces to help you adjust. But if your IPD (interpupillary distance) is not in the ideal range, then it's very hard to get perfect.

For the screen size a couple things matter. One is what you're connecting. If it's your phone, then the phone can limit the screen size due to having a different aspect ratio. Also mobile apps for tv shows and movies can be formatted in a way that looks small even when enlarged.

Better way to watch is to connect to a laptop, or if you have a Samsung phone, connect in DeX mode. DeX mode apps use the full screen and reformat the TV apps to have subtitles not take up such a large part of the screen. On iPhones connect over wired airplay.

The other thing is sitting in front of a wall at a far enough distance like you would for a tv. When there's some light and you can see the wall a bit, you can feel the effect.

There are exceptions and some people cannot see this illusion so it ruins the experience for them.

I usually don't feel the 200 in thing though. In my experience it's more like between 80-120 in depending on where I'm watching. Occasionally like 32 inches if I'm too close to something.

rhythm3232

Jul 29, 2026 11:52 AM

84 Comments

Joined Oct 2010

rhythm3232Jul 29, 2026 11:52 AM

84 Comments

Giving it a try. Should be fun with the switch - although you need the battery accessory. Thanks OP!

Ointment3d

Yesterday 11:50 PM

183 Comments

Joined Jan 2008

Ointment3dYesterday 11:50 PM

183 Comments

Quote from UniqueLeopard361

:

I'd pay $40 more for the 3S Pro. I had the opportunity to try out the 3S/3S Pro/4 Rpo, and for me the 3S Pro was the sweet spot. If you're not familiar with these types of glasses, they are display glasses that connect over USB C, just like the portable monitors. So your devices have to be compatible with USB C with Alt DP. Note: For the Nintendo Switch 1/2 you need special charging adapters to play on the glasses as Nintendo uses a proprietary protocol. Also note that if you intend to watch 3D content on it you need to have 3D FSBS/HSBS files. The glasses want FSBS, but with VLC media player on iOS/Android, and PotPlayer on Windows you can watch HSBS files on the glasses in full screen 3D. Also note that so far none of the Pixel phones are compatible with 3D although they work for general use with the glasses. Now for the differences between the 3 models I mentioned. 3S (current post): Very decent glasses. A lot of people like the hardshell case. There are some issues with internal reflections, and corners of the screen can get cut off. But can be doable for a decent amount of people. 3S Pro: Very little internal reflections. Screen fits into view very easily. Slightly uncomfortable on right side arm after a little while. Comes with a cloth case that I personally like a lot, but many people seem to dislike. 4 Pro: OSD menu is a little better. Comes with HDR compatibility, but kind of useless on phones if you're trying to get true HDR. Your host device has to support it. AI HDR can be an enjoyable gimmick. Same cloth case. Very difficult to get all four corners in view. Many people in the community have resorted to nosepad modifications to get it to work. For some people it seems to be fine though. Not for me unfortunately. The RayNeo app is not needed, but with the 4 Pro if you want to try out their experimental AI 2D to 3D video conversion I think you need the 4 Pro. But otherwise there's not too much that's different. So my personal recommendation is the 3S Pro.

Thoughts on the Viture Pro Xr for $144 vs RayNeo Air 3S Pro for $185?I just bought the viture and I can't get the screen in frame. The bottom's always cut off and the closest I can get it to work properly is by using the nose guard attachment which brings my eyes too close to the screen, causing the eyelashes to rub. Any insights would be appreciated.

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Today 12:08 AM

412 Comments

Joined Nov 2020

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Today 12:08 AM

412 Comments

Quote from Ointment3d

:

Thoughts on the Viture Pro Xr for $144 vs RayNeo Air 3S Pro for $185?I just bought the viture and I can't get the screen in frame. The bottom's always cut off and the closest I can get it to work properly is by using the nose guard attachment which brings my eyes too close to the screen, causing the eyelashes to rub. Any insights would be appreciated.

If the Pro XR works for you it's pretty good. I've tried it and had similar issues. I could get it almost perfect with the gripless nosepad, but some light padding on my nose would've been perfect. Worked better when I tried using it lying down.

It's very close to the 3S Pro. The RayNeo screen is slightly bigger. Other than that not much difference. You don't have a menu on the Viture glasses, but the functions are mostly the same. I think to switch to 120Hz mode you need to use Spacewalker on your phone or Windows. But phones don't support 120Hz output anyway.

1

Ointment3d

Today 12:47 AM

183 Comments

Joined Jan 2008

Ointment3dToday 12:47 AM

183 Comments

Quote from UniqueLeopard361

:

If the Pro XR works for you it's pretty good. I've tried it and had similar issues. I could get it almost perfect with the gripless nosepad, but some light padding on my nose would've been perfect. Worked better when I tried using it lying down. It's very close to the 3S Pro. The RayNeo screen is slightly bigger. Other than that not much difference. You don't have a menu on the Viture glasses, but the functions are mostly the same. I think to switch to 120Hz mode you need to use Spacewalker on your phone or Windows. But phones don't support 120Hz output anyway.

Thanks, appreciate it. No spacewalks required for 120hz on laptop. One thing I think is going for Viture is the one-click lens dimming instead of a lens cover. Didn't see that on the RayNeo. Dang, just wish the glass was a hair bigger. I think I'll return these and wait for the tech to catch up

1

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Today 1:09 AM

412 Comments

Joined Nov 2020

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Today 1:09 AM

412 Comments

Quote from Ointment3d

:

Thanks, appreciate it. No spacewalks required for 120hz on laptop. One thing I think is going for Viture is the one-click lens dimming instead of a lens cover. Didn't see that on the RayNeo. Dang, just wish the glass was a hair bigger. I think I'll return these and wait for the tech to catch up

Yeah the dimming is cool. If you're able to return it then maybe do that and get the RayNeo. Or there's the new XReal XBX that's supposed to be cheap, though more expensive than this. RayNeo is also coming out with the GT Max.

There's other cool glasses but they cost a lot more.

Ointment3d

Today 2:19 AM

183 Comments

Joined Jan 2008

Ointment3dToday 2:19 AM

183 Comments

Quote from UniqueLeopard361

:

Yeah the dimming is cool. If you're able to return it then maybe do that and get the RayNeo. Or there's the new XReal XBX that's supposed to be cheap, though more expensive than this. RayNeo is also coming out with the GT Max. There's other cool glasses but they cost a lot more.

Man I would love to try those xbx's just on the simple basis of their weight. I use the Vitures as my steam deck monitor since the deck's lcd won't turn on. Plugged in the Viture and problem solved but after thinking this quirky method might be a better cost than an lcd screen replacement, it's just got its own quirks. The screen cutoffs, the brow heat, the reflection of my belly in the glass when I wear a white T....oooofAll this to deal with a headache steam deck. I bet those Xbx glasses do the trick with the weight and heat dissipation but I'm not prepared right now to drop $300.

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Today 3:17 AM

412 Comments

Joined Nov 2020

UniqueLeopard361

Pro

Today 3:17 AM

412 Comments

Quote from Ointment3d

:

Man I would love to try those xbx's just on the simple basis of their weight. I use the Vitures as my steam deck monitor since the deck's lcd won't turn on. Plugged in the Viture and problem solved but after thinking this quirky method might be a better cost than an lcd screen replacement, it's just got its own quirks. The screen cutoffs, the brow heat, the reflection of my belly in the glass when I wear a white T....oooofAll this to deal with a headache steam deck. I bet those Xbx glasses do the trick with the weight and heat dissipation but I'm not prepared right now to drop $300.

Ahh. Your other option might be to get a 50 dollar portable monitor. You just lose some mobility.

1

(Refurbished) RayNeo Air 3s 201" 120Hz FHD AR/XR Glasses $130.40 + Free Shipping

$130

$179

Community Voting

Join The Conversation

12 Comments

Join The Conversation

Related Searches

Popular Deals

Trending Deals