Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
popular
das1984 5.9K Views
Jul 29, 2026 2:49 PM

TP-Link LS1005G, Litewave 5 Port Gigabit Ethernet Unmanaged Switch $9.99

$9.99

$17

41% off
Amazon
Get Deal at Amazon

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
14Comments
Save
Share
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster

Community Voting

Deal Score
+28
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

14 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 29, 2026 4:22 PM
58 Comments
Joined Aug 2020
HooktonfonnixJul 29, 2026 4:22 PM
58 Comments
I've been waiting on a deal for a small network switch for my new house. Thanks!
1
Jul 29, 2026 8:30 PM
994 Comments
Joined Dec 2016
palmoyasJul 29, 2026 8:30 PM
994 Comments
I grabbed the 8 port for $14.99.
Pro
Jul 30, 2026 1:17 AM
2.4K Comments
Joined May 2010
artcab
Pro
Jul 30, 2026 1:17 AM
2.4K Comments
Quote from palmoyas View quoted comment :
I grabbed the 8 port for $14.99.
Smart move IMO - 5 ports fill up fast, considering you'll populate 3 ports right out of the box. Better to have the headroom of the 8 port. I've helped out a couple folks with their SOHO setups, and the 5 ports usuallty end up in the e-cycle pile.
Jul 30, 2026 1:53 PM
2K Comments
Joined Sep 2014
bootymongerJul 30, 2026 1:53 PM
2K Comments

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

Depending on your needs, don't forget that you can usually set an old unused wifi router to AP mode (with wifi disabled if you don't need it) and use that as a quick 5-port switch (WAN becomes another normal port in AP mode).
3
Jul 30, 2026 5:44 PM
994 Comments
Joined Dec 2016
palmoyasJul 30, 2026 5:44 PM
994 Comments
Quote from bootymonger View quoted comment :
Depending on your needs, don't forget that you can usually set an old unused wifi router to AP mode (with wifi disabled if you don't need it) and use that as a quick 5-port switch (WAN becomes another normal port in AP mode).
Didn't know this!
1
Jul 30, 2026 11:17 PM
149 Comments
Joined Nov 2007
kevinbh93Jul 30, 2026 11:17 PM
149 Comments
Quote from artcab View quoted comment :
Smart move IMO - 5 ports fill up fast, considering you'll populate 3 ports right out of the box. Better to have the headroom of the 8 port. I've helped out a couple folks with their SOHO setups, and the 5 ports usuallty end up in the e-cycle pile.
Why three ports right out of the box? I understand saying two since you'll have one for connection to the rest of the network and then a second one for the component you're expanding to. What's the third?
Pro
Jul 30, 2026 11:42 PM
2.4K Comments
Joined May 2010
artcab
Pro
Jul 30, 2026 11:42 PM
2.4K Comments
Quote from kevinbh93 View quoted comment :
Why three ports right out of the box? I understand saying two since you'll have one for connection to the rest of the network and then a second one for the component you're expanding to. What's the third?
The third is the uplink to the rest of the wired network.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 30, 2026 11:45 PM
149 Comments
Joined Nov 2007
kevinbh93Jul 30, 2026 11:45 PM
149 Comments
Quote from artcab View quoted comment :
The third is the uplink to the rest of the wired network.
I already covered that one. It was the first one I mentioned. That activates the other four ports for connection. So, you could say two because you're only expanding it because you have something to connect to it. What's the third?
Pro
Jul 31, 2026 12:33 AM
2.4K Comments
Joined May 2010
artcab
Pro
Jul 31, 2026 12:33 AM
2.4K Comments
Quote from kevinbh93 View quoted comment :
I already covered that one. It was the first one I mentioned. That activates the other four ports for connection. So, you could say two because you're only expanding it because you have something to connect to it. What's the third?
As an example, I have a network cable connected to the back of my PC on my desk. I want to add a network printer next to that PC, and it's not practical to run an additional cable back to the switch or router that the PC's cable is connected to - I buy an unmanaged switch, put it on my desk, plug in the cable that was previously plugged in to my PC to the uplink port on the switch (in fact ANY port on the back of the switch, as even these unmanaged switches can figure out which of their ports is the uplink), and then use a patch cable to connect the PC to any of the other unoccupied ports, and another patch cable to connect the network printer to any of the other unoccupied ports. 3 ports - one for the uplink, one each for the PC and printer.

An unmanaged switch that's uplinked to the remainder of the network on one port and only has one additional device plugged in to it (like a PC) on another port (2 ports in use) is an unnecessary use of a switch, consuming unnecessary power as it's plugged in, and adding additional unneeded network overhead - the "uplink" cable can simply be plugged in to the back of the PC, no need for a switch.
Last edited by artcab July 30, 2026 at 06:20 PM.
Jul 31, 2026 2:52 PM
149 Comments
Joined Nov 2007
kevinbh93Jul 31, 2026 2:52 PM
149 Comments
Quote from artcab View quoted comment :
As an example, I have a network cable connected to the back of my PC on my desk. I want to add a network printer next to that PC, and it's not practical to run an additional cable back to the switch or router that the PC's cable is connected to - I buy an unmanaged switch, put it on my desk, plug in the cable that was previously plugged in to my PC to the uplink port on the switch (in fact ANY port on the back of the switch, as even these unmanaged switches can figure out which of their ports is the uplink), and then use a patch cable to connect the PC to any of the other unoccupied ports, and another patch cable to connect the network printer to any of the other unoccupied ports. 3 ports - one for the uplink, one each for the PC and printer.

An unmanaged switch that's uplinked to the remainder of the network on one port and only has one additional device plugged in to it (like a PC) on another port (2 ports in use) is an unnecessary use of a switch, consuming unnecessary power as it's plugged in, and adding additional unneeded network overhead - the "uplink" cable can simply be plugged in to the back of the PC, no need for a switch.
I can see where you're coming from.
1
Aug 1, 2026 2:02 AM
4.7K Comments
Joined May 2007
hy_tekAug 1, 2026 2:02 AM
4.7K Comments
Bought the one with the metal case and connection indicator lights for $13 in another deal here. Much nicer unit.
Aug 1, 2026 4:52 AM
804 Comments
Joined Dec 2007
enzoltAug 1, 2026 4:52 AM
804 Comments
Quote from hy_tek View quoted comment :
Bought the one with the metal case and connection indicator lights for $13 in another deal here. Much nicer unit.
Link?
Aug 2, 2026 5:11 PM
7.8K Comments
Joined Jan 2009
make_moneysAug 2, 2026 5:11 PM
7.8K Comments
Quote from bootymonger View quoted comment :
Depending on your needs, don't forget that you can usually set an old unused wifi router to AP mode (with wifi disabled if you don't need it) and use that as a quick 5-port switch (WAN becomes another normal port in AP mode).
How's the latency on a repurposed router? It might be higher than a barebone switch . These things have minimal latency because they're driverless
Last edited by make_moneys August 2, 2026 at 10:16 AM.
Aug 2, 2026 6:57 PM
2K Comments
Joined Sep 2014
bootymongerAug 2, 2026 6:57 PM
2K Comments
Quote from make_moneys View quoted comment :
How's the latency on a repurposed router? It might be higher than a barebone switch . These things have minimal latency because they're driverless
Depends on how old the router is, I suppose, but it's generally a non-issue, like 1ms or less since we're talking about wired connections. In AP mode the router turns off most of the stuff that might cause latency and it pretty much becomes an unmanaged switch. Even in router mode the wired connection hardly adds any latency (unless it's a cheap/old underpowered router trying to do too much, perhaps). If it's a gigabit router from the last 15 years or whatever, it probably won't add much latency. If it's like 20+ years old and only 100 Mbps, maybe it will. If you're using it as a wireless AP/bridge, that's a different story, but even then it's probably fine especially if you're just using it for streaming, browsing, etc. The other other issue is it might be less efficient in terms of power consumption and on a long enough timeline it might use more in electricity cost than this $10 switch. 2 watts takes like 2-4 years to cost $10 depending on your power cost. If this is 4 watts less than whatever AP mode router you have, then "pays for itself in power savings" will obviously be sooner. Of course, by then a chicken sandwich combo will probably cost $20 (if it doesn't already), so it's all relative.

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!