Joined Oct 2003
L10: Grand Master
Forum Thread
Lounge classics thread
March 15, 2008 at
07:04 PM
in
News
(2)
The new archive features sends dormant threads (no posts in 180 days) to an archive site where you'll be able to read and view old threads but not be able to bump.
Link any thread you'd like prevented from being archived here. This is meant mainly for the lounge classics, but if there's a reason for saving any thread either post why or pm me and we can work on it.
edit- No point in suggesting locked threads. There can't be discussion in those threads, and they're still going to be available to read whenever you want at the archive site.
Link any thread you'd like prevented from being archived here. This is meant mainly for the lounge classics, but if there's a reason for saving any thread either post why or pm me and we can work on it.
edit- No point in suggesting locked threads. There can't be discussion in those threads, and they're still going to be available to read whenever you want at the archive site.
Community Wiki
Last Edited by ~Kimber~
March 21, 2008
at
07:33 AM
Should there be a master list here?
That's an excellent idea! I nominate JeanGrey to do it!
That's an excellent idea! I nominate JeanGrey to do it!
314 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
All of you!
DIED TO ME.
I don't think you are disgraceful though
NM you must have been hanging around with AM too much today.
NM you must have been hanging around with AM too much today.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It seems like almost everytime I click on a thread, it has been deleted
So because certain individuals were being abusive by bumping threads, this is what has to be done?
So in effect, we just lost a lot of threads that were probably worthwhile to read.
It seems like almost everytime I click on a thread, it has been deleted
So because certain individuals were being abusive by bumping threads, this is what has to be done?
So in effect, we just lost a lot of threads that were probably worthwhile to read.
He was not disgraced.
He was not disgraced.
Oh my farking god, you are calling him a sexual predator? Comparing him to actual deviants?
Do you have any proof? And of course he can't defend himself.
We all know what this was all about.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
This post seems to state otherwise:
https://slickdeals.net/forums/showpost.php?p=