Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
I recommend the 8 quart size. I live alone, but when cooking for family of 5, this is needed. Remember, the pot can't be filled to the top.
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
$80. Not slick at all.
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker
...
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
I got the 8qt duo nova at kohl’s for $74.95 and also got $10 kohl’s cash. Not very slick
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
I have to wonder with all of the Duo Nova BF deals and the recent Evo release, what will happen last minute to pricing on both this holiday season. I think prices will see more aggressive cuts on the...
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
So close to BF, I will take my chances and wait. Same price currently on Amazon. According to CCC, the cheapest from Amazon was $49.95 on 7/18/2019.
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
It's a few bucks cheaper at Kohl's with coupons. You get $10 in Kohl's cash also
Instant Pot DUO60 6 Qt 7-in-1 Multi-Use Programmable Pressure Cooker $64.95
Expired
Thread created 11-12-2019 by BeautifulLlama565
0 Score
7 Replies
5,024 Views
Been cheaper in past, not slick