5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
Looks too colorful to be so in real life?
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
Walmart has the 5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set for $44.97. Shipping is free.
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
Damn. No twin sizes. Only full. And why is it so hard to find these in cotton? It's always "microfiber" (aka sweaty plastic).
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
Much cheaper to make I imagine. I had one of these from maybe 9 years ago that I got really really cheap and it really was just sweaty gross plastic. Unsure if they've changed them recently.
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
It’s only fair that you call cotton, “non-sweaty fiber”
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
Noice!
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
I usually only like to pay about 10 cents per LEGO piece. At 9$ per piece I’ll have to pass
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
very cool!
5-Pc Lego Movie 2 Bed-in-a-Bag, Kids Bedding Bundle Set $45 + Free shipping
Expired
Thread created 09-23-2020 by the-press-box
+4 Score
8 Replies
4,121 Views
Because cotton would cost more.