Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core 4.2 GHz AMD Radeon Graphics Desktop Processor Expired
$557
$699.00
+ Free Shipping
Amazon has AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Gaming Desktop Processor on sale for $629.99 - $72.99 when you clip the coupon on the product page = $557. Shipping is free.
Thanks to community members phoinix and thedancingfridge [discuss] for finding this deal.
Specs/Features:
Thanks to community members phoinix and thedancingfridge [discuss] for finding this deal.
Specs/Features:
- 5nm 120W
- 128MB L3 Cache
- 16MB L2 Cache
- AMD Radeon Graphics
- Windows 11 Supported
Editor's Notes & Price Research
Written by
- About this deal:
- This offer is $43 lower than a recent Frontpage deal.
- Refer to the forum thread for additional details and community discussion.
- Ratings & Reviews:
- Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars based on 80 customer reviews.
- About this store:
- Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
- If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
Expired:
Newegg has AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Gaming Desktop Processor on sale for $662 - $105 off with promo code FTTPCU582 = $557. Shipping is free.
Original Post
Written by
Edited July 6, 2023
at 08:57 AM
Amazon [amazon.com] has AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor for $629.99 - $72.99 when you 'clip' the coupon on product page = $557.00.
Shipping is free.
Price:
$142.00 lower (20% savings) than the list price of $699.00
$72.99 coupon applied to one item at checkout
Customer reviews:
★★★★★ / 78 global ratings
About this Item:
Shipping is free.
Price:
$142.00 lower (20% savings) than the list price of $699.00
$72.99 coupon applied to one item at checkout
Customer reviews:
★★★★★ / 78 global ratings
About this Item:
- THE ULTIMATE GAMING PROCESSOR FOR SERIOUS CREATORS
- 16 Cores and 32 processing threads, combined with a massive 144MB of cache
- 5.7 GHz Max Boost, Unlocked Memory Overclocking, DDR5 support
- For the state-of-the-art Socket AM5 platform, can support PCIe 5.0 on select 600 Series motherboards
- Cooler not included, liquid cooler recommended
in
CPUs
(7)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Computers Deals
View AllFrontpage
$6.95
& More + Free Shipping
34
38
Frontpage
$1499
+ Free Shipping
80
69
Frontpage
Frontpage
$374
+ Free Shipping
35
38
Price Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4.2 GHz 16-Core AM5 Processor
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
| Product Name: | AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor |
| Manufacturer: | AMD |
| Model Number: | AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D |
| Product SKU: | B0BTRH9MNS |
| UPC: | 730143314893 |
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if it’s the right card for you.
35 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
That site is not super useful for getting real world info on what a given CPU does against another in anything but synthetic measurements.
here for example:
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
The 7950X3D is almost 40fps faster on average than the i8-13700 you're comparing it to across a suite of a bunch of games at 1080p...
Of course the 7800X3D is an even better deal since it's only 4 fps behind the 7950X3D for a price much nearer the i7-13700k so it's a better choice than either for a pure gaming build.
Productivity is a different story, for single thread the 13700k is going to be comparably ahead of the AMD ones...and the 7950X3D will be noticably better than the 7800X3D thanks to higher clocks.
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
For multi-thread it's a bit of split the difference... the 7950X3D beats the 13700k and the 7800X3D though possibly not beating the Intel by enough to justify the price gap, and if this is your focus anyway the i9-13900k is still a little cheaper than the 7950X3D and beats it slightly here (though it's worse for gaming than the 7950X3D)
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
tl;dr- If this is a gaming-only build the 7800X3D is the way to go. The 7950X3D really only makes sense for someone who wants a top gaming chip AND needs to do productivity work....likewise the Intel i7 and i9 are worth a look if you need a mix, depending how heavily your mix is games vs. productivity (and if it's multi or single thread focused)
If your primary need is productivity and not gaming a non-X3D 7950 might be worth a look as again the i7/i9 chips would be.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Knightshade
https://cpu.userbenchma
"faster" at what?
That site is not super useful for getting real world info on what a given CPU does against another in anything but synthetic measurements.
here for example:
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
The 7950X3D is almost 40fps faster on average than the i8-13700 you're comparing it to across a suite of a bunch of games at 1080p...
Of course the 7800X3D is an even better deal since it's only 4 fps behind the 7950X3D for a price much nearer the i7-13700k so it's a better choice than either for a pure gaming build.
Productivity is a different story, for single thread the 13700k is going to be comparably ahead of the AMD ones...and the 7950X3D will be noticably better than the 7800X3D thanks to higher clocks.
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
For multi-thread it's a bit of split the difference... the 7950X3D beats the 13700k and the 7800X3D though possibly not beating the Intel by enough to justify the price gap, and if this is your focus anyway the i9-13900k is still a little cheaper than the 7950X3D and beats it slightly here (though it's worse for gaming than the 7950X3D)
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
tl;dr- If this is a gaming-only build the 7800X3D is the way to go. The 7950X3D really only makes sense for someone who wants a top gaming chip AND needs to do productivity work....likewise the Intel i7 and i9 are worth a look if you need a mix, depending how heavily your mix is games vs. productivity (and if it's multi or single thread focused)
If your primary need is productivity and not gaming a non-X3D 7950 might be worth a look as again the i7/i9 chips would be.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank 8BitByte
https://cpu.userbenchma
If you're looking at building a gaming computer, the best CPU on the market seems to be the 7800x3D. These x3D variants have an absurd amount of cache which helps with some gaming workloads. The 7950x3D may have more cores but it's split between two CCDs, which introduces some latency between cores and cache. I would avoid this CPU unless you have a specific use-case or non-gaming workload. I would take anything from userbenchmark with a grain of salt.. they're highly opinionated against AMD and synthetic benchmarks aren't all that useful.
That site is not super useful for getting real world info on what a given CPU does against another in anything but synthetic measurements.
here for example:
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
The 7950X3D is almost 40fps faster on average than the i8-13700 you're comparing it to across a suite of a bunch of games at 1080p...
Of course the 7800X3D is an even better deal since it's only 4 fps behind the 7950X3D for a price much nearer the i7-13700k so it's a better choice than either for a pure gaming build.
Productivity is a different story, for single thread the 13700k is going to be comparably ahead of the AMD ones...and the 7950X3D will be noticably better than the 7800X3D thanks to higher clocks.
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
For multi-thread it's a bit of split the difference... the 7950X3D beats the 13700k and the 7800X3D though possibly not beating the Intel by enough to justify the price gap, and if this is your focus anyway the i9-13900k is still a little cheaper than the 7950X3D and beats it slightly here (though it's worse for gaming than the 7950X3D)
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
tl;dr- If this is a gaming-only build the 7800X3D is the way to go. The 7950X3D really only makes sense for someone who wants a top gaming chip AND needs to do productivity work....likewise the Intel i7 and i9 are worth a look if you need a mix, depending how heavily your mix is games vs. productivity (and if it's multi or single thread focused)
If your primary need is productivity and not gaming a non-X3D 7950 might be worth a look as again the i7/i9 chips would be.
These are a hybrid chip meant to give you both excellent gaming performance and good workstation performance for specific tasks. At a price premium.
If you just want to game, the best chip on the market bar none is the $439 7800x3d. If you want best non gaming chip at this price point the intel 13900K is your best bet.
There are many issues with this chip due to the 2 CCD design with one having the Vcache and the other not. For most users, this is just a hassle and even at a reduced price point of $557 (vs 700 at launch), I would recommend people avoid these chips.
I have gone through 5 chips now. Only 1 was stable at stock settings when benching or running stress tests. AVX2 single core 2 thread workloads often caused errors and the Sha3 benchmark would often BSOD.
The one that works currently is also one of the worst thermally. 2 Cores hitting 88 degrees temp even with a 280mm AIO or a high quality dual tower cooler. So overall a very poor experience with this specific chip.
TLDR - just get a 7800x3d for gaming. For other more workstation/content creation workloads, get a 13900K.
In my case, I upvoted the OP since this is a great price for what this chip is. I also purchased one to replace my current one I got for $650 from Amazon since my current and stable one is also thermally quite poor.
Even the 78003dx seemed to have some issues compared to the 58003dx, and to only be the fastest when paired with the top GPU, the 7900XTX (or presumably 4090)..
These are a hybrid chip meant to give you both excellent gaming performance and good workstation performance for specific tasks. At a price premium.
If you just want to game, the best chip on the market bar none is the $439 7800x3d. If you want best non gaming chip at this price point the intel 13900K is your best bet.
There are many issues with this chip due to the 2 CCD design with one having the Vcache and the other not. For most users, this is just a hassle and even at a reduced price point of $557 (vs 700 at launch), I would recommend people avoid these chips.
I have gone through 5 chips now. Only 1 was stable at stock settings when benching or running stress tests. AVX2 single core 2 thread workloads often caused errors and the Sha3 benchmark would often BSOD.
The one that works currently is also one of the worst thermally. 2 Cores hitting 88 degrees temp even with a 280mm AIO or a high quality dual tower cooler. So overall a very poor experience with this specific chip.
TLDR - just get a 7800x3d for gaming. For other more workstation/content creation workloads, get a 13900K.
In my case, I upvoted the OP since this is a great price for what this chip is. I also purchased one to replace my current one I got for $650 from Amazon since my current and stable one is also thermally quite poor.
Well said. This generation of Ryzen is a mess.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Figity
Having said that spending ~$600 on a cpu that fried itself is a bit scary especially since amd is allowing the cpu's to push themself to a pretty high temp of 89 C for the x3d and 95 C for the regular cpu's. The guy above complaining his is flawed cuz it was at 88C is pretty funny cuz if you watch any reviews they all say the cpu will push itself to that max temp of ~89 C to achieve max performance and thats by design so its proof his cpu is working perfectly. He prolly didnt download his chipset drivers so he's having crashes/bugs.
That site is not super useful for getting real world info on what a given CPU does against another in anything but synthetic measurements.
here for example:
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
The 7950X3D is almost 40fps faster on average than the i8-13700 you're comparing it to across a suite of a bunch of games at 1080p...
Of course the 7800X3D is an even better deal since it's only 4 fps behind the 7950X3D for a price much nearer the i7-13700k so it's a better choice than either for a pure gaming build.
Productivity is a different story, for single thread the 13700k is going to be comparably ahead of the AMD ones...and the 7950X3D will be noticably better than the 7800X3D thanks to higher clocks.
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
For multi-thread it's a bit of split the difference... the 7950X3D beats the 13700k and the 7800X3D though possibly not beating the Intel by enough to justify the price gap, and if this is your focus anyway the i9-13900k is still a little cheaper than the 7950X3D and beats it slightly here (though it's worse for gaming than the 7950X3D)
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
tl;dr- If this is a gaming-only build the 7800X3D is the way to go. The 7950X3D really only makes sense for someone who wants a top gaming chip AND needs to do productivity work....likewise the Intel i7 and i9 are worth a look if you need a mix, depending how heavily your mix is games vs. productivity (and if it's multi or single thread focused)
If your primary need is productivity and not gaming a non-X3D 7950 might be worth a look as again the i7/i9 chips would be.
That site is not super useful for getting real world info on what a given CPU does against another in anything but synthetic measurements.
here for example:
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
The 7950X3D is almost 40fps faster on average than the i8-13700 you're comparing it to across a suite of a bunch of games at 1080p...
Of course the 7800X3D is an even better deal since it's only 4 fps behind the 7950X3D for a price much nearer the i7-13700k so it's a better choice than either for a pure gaming build.
Productivity is a different story, for single thread the 13700k is going to be comparably ahead of the AMD ones...and the 7950X3D will be noticably better than the 7800X3D thanks to higher clocks.
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
For multi-thread it's a bit of split the difference... the 7950X3D beats the 13700k and the 7800X3D though possibly not beating the Intel by enough to justify the price gap, and if this is your focus anyway the i9-13900k is still a little cheaper than the 7950X3D and beats it slightly here (though it's worse for gaming than the 7950X3D)
https://cdn.mos.cms.fut
tl;dr- If this is a gaming-only build the 7800X3D is the way to go. The 7950X3D really only makes sense for someone who wants a top gaming chip AND needs to do productivity work....likewise the Intel i7 and i9 are worth a look if you need a mix, depending how heavily your mix is games vs. productivity (and if it's multi or single thread focused)
If your primary need is productivity and not gaming a non-X3D 7950 might be worth a look as again the i7/i9 chips would be.
You should be comparing the 7800 to the 13700.
You should be comparing the 7800 to the 13700.
Because the 13700 is the CPU the person I was replying to specifically asked about in comparison.
Of course I also mentioned the 13900 in my reply-quite specifically as comparison for productivity vs the 7950-- you seem to have missed that.