Are On Running and Hoka really worth the premium price? I mean the discounted prices of these shoes are around $100, much more expensive compared to Nike, Adidas, etc.
Are On Running and Hoka really worth the premium price? I mean the discounted prices of these shoes are around $100, much more expensive compared to Nike, Adidas, etc.
Depends on what you want them for. A lot of their models are lifestyle shoes and people get them because they're trendy and look good. I have the Clifton 9s and they are super comfortable for walking around and standing but not the best running shoes to me.
I don't think either of them are doing anything revolutionary compared to other comfortable shoe brands if you're only after comfort or running performance. If you value fashion or looks they're the current kings of the athleisure wave.
Are On Running and Hoka really worth the premium price? I mean the discounted prices of these shoes are around $100, much more expensive compared to Nike, Adidas, etc.
In my experience there is a substantial quality difference between a Brooks, Saucony and pure running shoe vs what the others offer. This is strictly experiential so take it for what it is worth but when I coached track (13 years) there were much less joint issues on one of the bigger running brands than on the Nike, adidas and Reebok. As another example my wife had Nikes for a couch to 5k and switched to saucony and her hip pain left .
Are On Running and Hoka really worth the premium price? I mean the discounted prices of these shoes are around $100, much more expensive compared to Nike, Adidas, etc.
It depends on what you are going to do with the shoe and which type you're looking at. If you want a real running shoe that is going to be a daily trainer that you rack up the miles in, then these kind of shoes with premium foams and max stacks will help your body survive.
However, most of the major mainstream brands also have models that are comparable. You just have to know what you're looking for. Take a look at the reviews here to get a better idea:
Tried on a bunch of these at Nordstrom Rack (they had a lot of them for some reason) and none felt comfortable to me even just standing or walking, let alone running. Granted I have slightly wide feet with a very low arch. I'm a super casual runner (one 6+ mile run a week) and would rather go for Asics, New Balance, Brooks, Saucony, etc. I see people wearing these all over the place nowadays, but I don't see the hype or what makes them so expensive.
Tried on a bunch of these at Nordstrom Rack (they had a lot of them for some reason) and none felt comfortable to me even just standing or walking, let alone running. Granted I have slightly wide feet with a very low arch. I'm a super casual runner (one 6+ mile run a week) and would rather go for Asics, New Balance, Brooks, Saucony, etc. I see people wearing these all over the place nowadays, but I don't see the hype or what makes them so expensive.
Same, I tried them a few days ago at Nordstrom rack and they didn't feel as good as they look
I did like some hoka that felt great but they were about $140. I currently run with Asics kayano and I think I'll keep using that model for a while, and $140 for walking shoes seems like too much for me
I need a great walking shoe for travel. Any recommendations? Thinking of allbirds also
I have a pair of onC cloud 5 for about 4 years and have worn them quite a bit. They've been on 2 Europe trips with several miles walking daily for both of those plus they're my go -to for local stuff here. I play basketball on the driveway with my son with them on. I've never before gotten compliments on any of my shoes until these ones where I've gotten several from even random people. I've also washed them in the sink about 3 times with water and oxyclean and they're still perfect condition despite water exposure. I got them on sale at that time for like 70 bucks. Definitely worth the money in opinion. A lot of the negative "they're just a fashion trend" comments are usually by people who cannot afford them or are too cheap to buy them. I believe both hoka and onC have models that are fit for true activity... Just do some research on which ones hold up better
Are On Running and Hoka really worth the premium price? I mean the discounted prices of these shoes are around $100, much more expensive compared to Nike, Adidas, etc.
I run about 50 miles a week and I consistently keep a pair of Hoka Clifton 9s in the rotation for recovery runs. Not great for faster runs but awesome for slow long runs.
I have 3 pairs of On Cloud Monsters. They're up there in terms of the most comfortable shoes I've ever worn. Hokas are great too. Even Nike React soles are great. I stand/walk a good bit for work. They're great for that. I'm not a runner so I can't vouch for that. I have tried their cheaper shoes (these included) and they're not as comfortable. They might be ok for some light walking but I wouldn't wear them if comfort was my main goal. If you're looking for comfort, get the cloud monsters.
I had one of my pairs rip on the inside edge of the toe box. Both shoes in the same spot. I emailed On and had a gift card for a replacement pair the next day. The shoes were 1 month outside of their 1 year warranty. I was just too lazy to message them during the 1 year. That's a company that stands behind their product and one I wont mind buying from again.
I have a pair of onC cloud 5 for about 4 years and have worn them quite a bit. They've been on 2 Europe trips with several miles walking daily for both of those plus they're my go -to for local stuff here. I play basketball on the driveway with my son with them on. I've never before gotten compliments on any of my shoes until these ones where I've gotten several from even random people. I've also washed them in the sink about 3 times with water and oxyclean and they're still perfect condition despite water exposure. I got them on sale at that time for like 70 bucks. Definitely worth the money in opinion. A lot of the negative "they're just a fashion trend" comments are usually by people who cannot afford them or are too cheap to buy them. I believe both hoka and onC have models that are fit for true activity... Just do some research on which ones hold up better
I'm confused; you have worn these shoes for two years in all activity, including sports and international travel, and have washed them in the sink and they look new?
Very few if any shoes, let alone athletic shoes, would endure what you describe.. can you post a picture of them?
I have two pairs of ON running shoes and I love them both. YMMV, they are not fashion shoes. People say that because they need some sort of weird bias confirmation.
Merrells high arch insoles don't fit me well, but I won't call them a fashion shoe because I'm mad they don't fit me.
16 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Depends on what you want them for. A lot of their models are lifestyle shoes and people get them because they're trendy and look good. I have the Clifton 9s and they are super comfortable for walking around and standing but not the best running shoes to me.
I don't think either of them are doing anything revolutionary compared to other comfortable shoe brands if you're only after comfort or running performance. If you value fashion or looks they're the current kings of the athleisure wave.
In my experience there is a substantial quality difference between a Brooks, Saucony and pure running shoe vs what the others offer. This is strictly experiential so take it for what it is worth but when I coached track (13 years) there were much less joint issues on one of the bigger running brands than on the Nike, adidas and Reebok. As another example my wife had Nikes for a couch to 5k and switched to saucony and her hip pain left .
However, most of the major mainstream brands also have models that are comparable. You just have to know what you're looking for. Take a look at the reviews here to get a better idea:
https://runrepeat.com/
I did like some hoka that felt great but they were about $140. I currently run with Asics kayano and I think I'll keep using that model for a while, and $140 for walking shoes seems like too much for me
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I run about 50 miles a week and I consistently keep a pair of Hoka Clifton 9s in the rotation for recovery runs. Not great for faster runs but awesome for slow long runs.
Saucony that has apa approval
I had one of my pairs rip on the inside edge of the toe box. Both shoes in the same spot. I emailed On and had a gift card for a replacement pair the next day. The shoes were 1 month outside of their 1 year warranty. I was just too lazy to message them during the 1 year. That's a company that stands behind their product and one I wont mind buying from again.
Very few if any shoes, let alone athletic shoes, would endure what you describe.. can you post a picture of them?
Merrells high arch insoles don't fit me well, but I won't call them a fashion shoe because I'm mad they don't fit me.