Egyptians angry at film scale U.S. embassy walls

In their questioning and in the public testimony they invited, the lawmakers managed to disclose, without ever mentioning [the CIA] directly, that there was a seven-member “rapid response force” in the compound the State Department was calling an annex.

The disclosures came out in a vague sort of way that mostly only Washington experts would realize. For instance, one of the State Department officials revealed that not all of the security personnel in Benghazi "fell under my direct operational control." Who controlled them? An entity members of the hearing described as the "other government agency," which is a typical Washington euphemism for CIA./quote]

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/gl...azi/57852/

Yes, the STATE DEPARTMENT made a mistake in displaying CIA locations in Benghazi.

It doesn't matter what else she says. She specifically said "no, sir" in response to a question about budget. If you feel that she had some profound statement as to how the budget mattered even after she specifically said it didn't, I respectfully request that you track down the video to show as much.

What are your thought on the false narratives that came out regarding protests turned violent, and all that shit?
Why were we lied to repeatedly? That's my big concern with all of this.

I'll put your concerns to rest, then.

As much as people like to think that we have perfect knowledge at all times, the reality is that we don't know everything that's going on in the world at all times. An event happens, we gather our best, informed opinion about what happened, and then refine our understanding as more data comes in.

I'm not the one who provided a fraudulent link to a fake source.

They pushed this narrative for days. You don't believe they knew what was really going on?

Interesting...if you look at their source, it's a youtube clip. She says "No sir [SNIP]." She is cut off at the very beginning of a sentence. What did she go on to say? Wonder if the Examiner will tell us?

Rohrabacher: It's been suggested that budget cuts were responsible for a lack of security, uh, in Benghazi, uh, and I'd like to ask, uh, Ms. Lamb, you'd made this decision personally, was there any budget consideration, and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people, uh, in the security force there?

Lamb: No, sir, and...

Rohrabacher: Okay, that's all I need, thank you very much.

Vice President Joseph Biden speaks only for himself and President Barack Obama, and neither man was aware that U.S. officials in Libya had asked the State Department for more security before the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, a top White House official told The Cable..

Biden has come under fire for saying at Thursday night's debate, "We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there."

The Cable asked Deputy National Security Advisor for Communications Ben Rhodes whether Biden was speaking for the entire Obama administration, including the State Department, which acknowledged receiving multiple requests for more Libya security in the months before the attacks. Rhodes said that Biden speaks only for himself and the president and neither of them knew about the requests at the time.

Vice President Biden blamed intelligence officials for the administration’s changing account of the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, during Thursday night’s debate with Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.).

The Obama administration has been under fire for initially linking the attack on the U.S. Consulate to an anti-Islam video made in the U.S. before later acknowledging that that the attack was an act of terrorism, not a protest that turned violent.

Biden said the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, was repeating what intelligence sources had told her when she blamed the video as a “proximate cause” of the violence in an interview five days after the attack.

“The intelligence community told us that,” Biden said. “As they learned more facts about exactly what happened, they changed their assessment.”

Hillary is going under the bus...
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com...i_security


http://thehill.com/blogs/global-a...ibya-story


H/T Biden: Hey, none of us knew that the Benghazi consulate wanted more security! [hotair.com]

You called it. Hillary falls on her sword...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/...?hpt=hp_c1

You called it. Hillary falls on her sword...[/URL]

I'm guessing she's gone if he ends up winning again. She'll either resign saying it's best for the campaign to get rid of distractions, or resign saying it's best for the new admin to get rid of distractions.

You called it. Hillary falls on her sword...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/...?hpt=hp_c1

I'm guessing she's gone if he ends up winning again. She'll either resign saying it's best for the campaign to get rid of distractions, or resign saying it's best for the new admin to get rid of distractions.