Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Rating: | (4.4 out of 5 stars) |
Reviews: | 11 Target Reviews |
Product Name: | Acer Chromebook 15 CB315-2HT-47WG Silver 15.6" FHD IPS Touchscreen |
Product Description: | Absolutely Stunning. The Acer Chromebook 315 is designed to keep you on the move. Powered by an AMD A4 Dual-Core Porcessor and Radeon Grapahics, this Chromebook allows you to do more - fast web browsing, apps and word processing. The larger 15.6" Full HD Touch display and upward facing speakers immerse you in an epic entertainment experience with plenty of room to watch videos, play games, or edit videos. This fast Chromebook delivers amazing value with long battery life and access to Android apps from Google Play to learn and do more. |
Product SKU: | target_76374192 |
UPC: | 193199323231 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
66 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Celeron 4000 - 16,000
A4-9120c - 14,000
Celeron 3350 - 11,000
MediaTek M8173C - 10,000
Celeron 3160 - 8600
https://zipso.net/chromebook-spec...son-table/
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
That chip is better in every way compared to the Intel Celeron 3350 usually found in Chromebooks this price
Don't know too much about processors, but how would the AMD A4 compare to the 1.6 - 2.24 GHz Intel Celeron N3160 Quad-Core Processor
... performance wise. Power consumption aside.
... performance wise. Power consumption aside.
Octane is basically the go to benchmark for things you can actually do on Chromebooks, here are scores for some of the most popular chips in budget Chromebooks:
Celeron 4000 - 16,000
A4-9120c - 14,000
Celeron 3350 - 11,000
MediaTek M8173C - 10,000
Celeron 3160 - 8600
https://zipso.net/chromebook-spec...son-table/
Celeron 4000 - 16,000
A4-9120c - 14,000
Celeron 3350 - 11,000
MediaTek M8173C - 10,000
Celeron 3160 - 8600
https://zipso.net/chromebook-spec...son-table/
How much does quad-core vs dual-core matter in Chromebooks? ...again, performance wise. Power consumption aside.
Both of those Stoney Ridge chips launched around CES 2019 in January. CES 2020 is around the corner. It would be nice to see some Zen-based fanless APUs (5-8 Watts).
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
for once can agree with a naysayer, returned the lenovo a4 laptop for 129 because it was just too slow.
Celeron 4000 - 16,000
A4-9120c - 14,000
Celeron 3350 - 11,000
MediaTek M8173C - 10,000
Celeron 3160 - 8600
https://zipso.net/chromebook-spec...son-table/
maybe defective or something to do with slow ram or storage, but my a4 lenovo i returned was scoring as low as <9000 in octane. nothing near 14000. i think i hit >10k a couple runs.
also i think the benchmark sucks because for example my sd835 tab s4 scores 10,000 octane, but is like 5 times as fast as my old toshiba's chromebook that scores 8-9k. if you believed the benchmark they would be almost the same speed but in reality it's not close...
this does have a touchscreen and ips display though, which is nice. just wouldn't trust the power.
Edit: This CPU also passmarks 1700, which my Lenovo AMD chip I recall passmarked 2000. So whatever variant of a4 or a6 was in that lenovo was actually faster than this, yet still dreadfully slow.
I use a Celeron N2840 [cpubenchmark.net] Chromebook with 2GB RAM. It handles itself surprisingly well. The A4-9120C [cpubenchmark.net] or A6-9220C [cpubenchmark.net] with 4GB of RAM roll right over that in both single- and multi-threaded.
ChromeOS and Windows could be an apples and oranges comparison. On the other hand, I use an A6-3400M [cpubenchmark.net] Windows 7 laptop with HDD. Significantly lower performance than A6-9220C, but I still consider it usable.