DS1019+ price drop is now $570 (B&H), so about $190 per 8TB drive, and you have to buy others at full $212 price. The sweet spot for these 8TB are under $180.
Edit: corrected B&H recent deal price. We will likely see a similar price point periodically for the DS1019+
These are the CMR drives, not the cheaper, slower SMR drives WD is in hot water over for not disclosing.
Are you sure on that? AFAIK the 8+ TB Reds are the only ones guaranteed to be CMR. The smaller Reds were supposed to be CMR as well but they recently admitted that some smaller drives use SMR.
EDIT: Seems that the 64MB cache ones are always CMR and the newer larger cache drives have the possibility of being SMR.
Are you sure on that? AFAIK the 8+ TB Reds are the only ones guaranteed to be CMR. The smaller Reds were supposed to be CMR as well but they recently admitted that some smaller drives use SMR.
EDIT: Seems that the 64MB cache ones are always CMR and the newer larger cache drives have the possibility of being SMR.
CMR is literally in the title on the product page of the 4 TB drive
DS1019+ price drop is now $550 (B&H), so about $200 per 8TB drive, and you have to buy others at full $212 price. The sweet spot for these 8TB are under $180.
DS1019+ price drop is now $550 (B&H), so about $200 per 8TB drive, and you have to buy others at full $212 price. The sweet spot for these 8TB are under $180.
The DS1019+ is $570 on B&H, not $550. That brings the drives down to $190 each for 8 TB.
There's multiple reports on /r/DataHoarder about sellers advertising these drives as CMR, packaging indicating the drive has a CMR model #, only to open it up and find an SMR drive.
That said, even if you do get a CMR drive, why support a shady company? The shadiness continued this week with their introduction of a "Red Plus" line...
I would stay away from 4TB Reds before they officially launch the "Red Plus" range which will be CMR for sure. Although it is the SMR range that should be called Red "minus", and Red stay what it always was.
BTW, the SMR drives are not slower per se. In isolation and for RAID arrays to be built etc, are actually newer/faster than the "old" 64MB cache CMRs. The travesty starts if a drive fails and you try to rebuild a relatively full array, using a SMR tech drive. So it is a tech that it is just not NAS friendly, or at least friendly to Parity checks. Probably there will be no issues for a simple RAID 1 (mirror).
32 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
DS1019+ price drop is now $570 (B&H), so about $190 per 8TB drive, and you have to buy others at full $212 price. The sweet spot for these 8TB are under $180.
Edit: corrected B&H recent deal price. We will likely see a similar price point periodically for the DS1019+
EDIT: Seems that the 64MB cache ones are always CMR and the newer larger cache drives have the possibility of being SMR.
EDIT: Seems that the 64MB cache ones are always CMR and the newer larger cache drives have the possibility of being SMR.
DS1019+ price drop is now $550 (B&H), so about $200 per 8TB drive, and you have to buy others at full $212 price. The sweet spot for these 8TB are under $180.
I use more 8TB or 10 TB drives....
DS1019+ price drop is now $550 (B&H), so about $200 per 8TB drive, and you have to buy others at full $212 price. The sweet spot for these 8TB are under $180.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The big difference is preference and the Rotational Speeds
5400 rpm - WD RED
7200 rpm - Segate IW
So I would match the brands so the speeds are different,
I have 4 8tb Reds in my Qnap
That said, even if you do get a CMR drive, why support a shady company? The shadiness continued this week with their introduction of a "Red Plus" line...
BTW, the SMR drives are not slower per se. In isolation and for RAID arrays to be built etc, are actually newer/faster than the "old" 64MB cache CMRs. The travesty starts if a drive fails and you try to rebuild a relatively full array, using a SMR tech drive. So it is a tech that it is just not NAS friendly, or at least friendly to Parity checks. Probably there will be no issues for a simple RAID 1 (mirror).