This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Bullshit, you won't see pixels unless you like to pretend to be an elitist and sit stupid close to a 32 inch screen. Anyone will find problems to complain about if they want to find problems.
I have a curved Acer 32", also just 1080p, and i'm typing on it right now, sitting 2.5 feet away from it , have perfect 20/20 vision and the screen is perfectly fine for text, videos and images. I game on it too. Will you see finer, sharper display on a QHD screen at the same size and distance, yes, but nobody is going to see pixels at typical, practical use scenarios.
If you want it.. Buy it. Don't listen to people putting down a deal. Who knows what they actually own/use. Just cause they have a comment on better don't mean they actually own better. Period
Then you have the "I would only get 4k at this time". Yeah, you do that with your onboard video. Most commenting on this deal couldn't push 4k at 60fps. This is a website for posting deals and I might be wrong but the name is Slickdeals.net.. Lol. "Ohh and I would only buy 8k and use hdmi from my onboard video".. Ha ;}
IKR...and none of these down voters state what GPU they have,for all we know they running onboard GPU.
Anyone that has this monitor, i notice 165hz is considered "overclock" with 120hz showing "native" on my nvidia panel. Does this produce any extra ghosting effects or anything when running at overclock? i had an old monitor that i could overclock through nvidia panel but it made ghosting really bad.
Friend just got this andwe tested it out with Xbox One X. Looked pretty good and would pair well with a Series S.
Pros: colors, brightness, refresh, gamer specific settings in menu like FPS cursors, VESA mount
Cons: about quarter inch of lightbleed on top edge and sides, some other minor lightbleed blooming, not great black levels (could adjust, but would crush blacks to get much more contrast), cheap stand
Great teen bedroom budget display for some movies and games. But not for full-time work/play PC use.
Anyone that has this monitor, i notice 165hz is considered "overclock" with 120hz showing "native" on my nvidia panel. Does this produce any extra ghosting effects or anything when running at overclock? i had an old monitor that i could overclock through nvidia panel but it made ghosting really bad.
Yes, I have two different custom builds and the one I tested this with was using AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. Nothing fancy but powerful enough to do web browsing with.
And I was comparing this screen to an old discontinued 1080p 27" BENQ monitor. After adjusting the setting, I couldn't even use the SlickDeals website as the font was so pixeled.
I am building a gaming rig mainly for driving simulators with triple screens. From my understanding, 3x1440 is more pixels for the GPU to push then 4K single, so 1080 is often recommended so you can run triples with high frame rates without braking the bank. I had been thinking of 27s, but this seems like good price with good specs for 1080 but bigger. What do you guys think, should I go for this or keep looking for 27s instead for a little crisper image? Anything else someone would recommend in place of these before I go for them?
Some people are just picky. I got one son that can game on any monitor regarless of size, resolution, ghosting issues, ect. Just doesn't care. Now my other son is super picky has a 240hz 1080p 25" that will not touch anything else. When he does he says its trash. Never had my other son complain once even after tasting 1440p, higher refresh rate, ect. His daily is a 10 year old 1080p 60hz monitor.
Bought this in store to replace my 42 inch 1080p TV that I use for my Xbox one x. It is definitely a nice monitor for the price. The gameplay felt so much smoother and the action was not as blurry on warzone.
Would there be a issue if you bought more then one and plan to use them together? Say 2 or 3. Would each screen look slightly different if the revisions are different? What are the differences between the revisions? Was the first one known to have issues?
All I can do is wait for ACER to respond to my queries.
But...
I have connected 2
The Display Ports (max 3) & 1 HDMI for my Graphics Card Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8G
I can set them (landscape or portrait) as individual screens, continuous wide or tall, dual computer mode for switching computers.
And yes, even when in continuous I can set different resolutions (but when I do this one screen slides around to fast to click on anything.
I also connected the VIZIO 50" thru DVI or HDMI and the above still occurs.
So the screens would look the same!
And with the up to date graphics drivers w/ control center apps you can switch them around to your hearts desire even using the HDMI for 4 monitors.
With me its CAD, but for games and stuff it will work out.
**HINT: Still have to test not only one audio option but 3 or more.**
I am building a gaming rig mainly for driving simulators with triple screens. From my understanding, 3x1440 is more pixels for the GPU to push then 4K single, so 1080 is often recommended so you can run triples with high frame rates without braking the bank. I had been thinking of 27s, but this seems like good price with good specs for 1080 but bigger. What do you guys think, should I go for this or keep looking for 27s instead for a little crisper image? Anything else someone would recommend in place of these before I go for them?
PS. my vision suck so...
Please just ensure your graphics card has the memory available to actually push 3 monitors 8GB min. and the Power Supply can give the system and graphics extra power and your all set.
I have a S01 and it's listed as 1ms on the box so not sure about that but maybe. Any way to actually check?
As I noted all I can do is wait for ACER to respond back.
But I do believe its still a toss up for both versions from 1 ms to 5 ms..
Just waiting and doing some tests as mentioned above...
and as others have mentioned: kindasmoothtoo : david_kay : Sniper82
Not knowing what anyone is running, and not to make this a tech forum.... but...
Mainboard - AMD X399 Gaming
CPU - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Graphics - Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8G
Power - 850W ATX 12V Full Modular
Memory - 64GB ECC 2667
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As I noted all I can do is wait for ACER to respond back.
But I do believe its still a toss up for both versions from 1 ms to 5 ms..
Just waiting and doing some tests as mentioned above...
and as others have mentioned: kindasmoothtoo : david_kay : Sniper82
Not knowing what anyone is running, and not to make this a tech forum.... but...
Mainboard - AMD X399 Gaming
CPU - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Graphics - Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8G
Power - 850W ATX 12V Full Modular
Memory - 64GB ECC 2667
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
I have a curved Acer 32", also just 1080p, and i'm typing on it right now, sitting 2.5 feet away from it , have perfect 20/20 vision and the screen is perfectly fine for text, videos and images. I game on it too. Will you see finer, sharper display on a QHD screen at the same size and distance, yes, but nobody is going to see pixels at typical, practical use scenarios.
418 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Then you have the "I would only get 4k at this time". Yeah, you do that with your onboard video. Most commenting on this deal couldn't push 4k at 60fps. This is a website for posting deals and I might be wrong but the name is Slickdeals.net.. Lol. "Ohh and I would only buy 8k and use hdmi from my onboard video".. Ha ;}
Pros: colors, brightness, refresh, gamer specific settings in menu like FPS cursors, VESA mount
Cons: about quarter inch of lightbleed on top edge and sides, some other minor lightbleed blooming, not great black levels (could adjust, but would crush blacks to get much more contrast), cheap stand
Great teen bedroom budget display for some movies and games. But not for full-time work/play PC use.
And I was comparing this screen to an old discontinued 1080p 27" BENQ monitor. After adjusting the setting, I couldn't even use the SlickDeals website as the font was so pixeled.
https://www.xfxforce.co
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://www.xfxforce.co
I am building a gaming rig mainly for driving simulators with triple screens. From my understanding, 3x1440 is more pixels for the GPU to push then 4K single, so 1080 is often recommended so you can run triples with high frame rates without braking the bank. I had been thinking of 27s, but this seems like good price with good specs for 1080 but bigger. What do you guys think, should I go for this or keep looking for 27s instead for a little crisper image? Anything else someone would recommend in place of these before I go for them?
PS. my vision suck so...
But...
I have connected 2
The Display Ports (max 3) & 1 HDMI for my Graphics Card Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8G
I can set them (landscape or portrait) as individual screens, continuous wide or tall, dual computer mode for switching computers.
And yes, even when in continuous I can set different resolutions (but when I do this one screen slides around to fast to click on anything.
I also connected the VIZIO 50" thru DVI or HDMI and the above still occurs.
So the screens would look the same!
And with the up to date graphics drivers w/ control center apps you can switch them around to your hearts desire even using the HDMI for 4 monitors.
With me its CAD, but for games and stuff it will work out.
**HINT: Still have to test not only one audio option but 3 or more.**
I am building a gaming rig mainly for driving simulators with triple screens. From my understanding, 3x1440 is more pixels for the GPU to push then 4K single, so 1080 is often recommended so you can run triples with high frame rates without braking the bank. I had been thinking of 27s, but this seems like good price with good specs for 1080 but bigger. What do you guys think, should I go for this or keep looking for 27s instead for a little crisper image? Anything else someone would recommend in place of these before I go for them?
PS. my vision suck so...
But I do believe its still a toss up for both versions from 1 ms to 5 ms..
Just waiting and doing some tests as mentioned above...
and as others have mentioned: kindasmoothtoo : david_kay : Sniper82
Not knowing what anyone is running, and not to make this a tech forum.... but...
Mainboard - AMD X399 Gaming
CPU - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Graphics - Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8G
Power - 850W ATX 12V Full Modular
Memory - 64GB ECC 2667
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
But I do believe its still a toss up for both versions from 1 ms to 5 ms..
Just waiting and doing some tests as mentioned above...
and as others have mentioned: kindasmoothtoo : david_kay : Sniper82
Not knowing what anyone is running, and not to make this a tech forum.... but...
Mainboard - AMD X399 Gaming
CPU - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Graphics - Radeon RX 580 GAMING 8G
Power - 850W ATX 12V Full Modular
Memory - 64GB ECC 2667
Leave a Comment