|
Quote
from IIII
Mine says 12.7 to. is that normal for a 14tb drive after formated?
:
|
|
Quote
from MadPup
1TB = 1,000,000,000,000 bytes (terabyte = 1000^4)
:
1TiB = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes (tebibyte = 1024^4) 1TB/1TiB = 0.9095 tebibytes per terabyte 14TB * 0.9095 = 12.73 TiB |
|
Quote
from pnguye70
Windows, however, sticks to the 1024 rule, which means it sees a 250GB hard drive as 232GB, and a 1TB drive as 931GB.This explains why hard drives appear to have a lower capacity than advertised.A 1TB hard drive has the capacity to store 1,000,000,000,000 bytes. Divide this by 1024 and you get 976,562,500KB. Divide by 1024 again and you get 953,674.3MB. Finally, divide by 1024 to get gigabytes and you end up with 931.32GB and so similar way you can calculate the process of 1 MB and 1024kb.
:
|
You can also use CrystalDiskInfo to confirm the disk model and capacity.
https://www.google.com/search?q=crysta
_________________________________________________________________
This post can be edited by most users to provide up-to-date information about developments of this thread based on user responses, and user findings. Feel free to add, change or remove information shown here as it becomes available. This includes new coupons, rebates, ideas, thread summary, and similar items.
Once a Thread Wiki is added to a thread, "Create Wiki" button will disappear. If you would like to learn more about Thread Wiki feature, click here.
Top Comments
Extended returns in effect if you're on the fence.
Purchases made October 13, 2020 through January 2, 2021 have an extended return period through January 16, 2021
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
751 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Yes, you can put it in your NAS if you have an extra slot or replace an old drive to expand storage.
(1) At first I bought a PC case [newegg.com] with 8 internal HDD bays. Thought that would last me for a while.
(2) Then I outgrew the PC case so I bought a RSV-L4500 [newegg.com] off Amazon for about $100. To utilize the extra internal drive bays I also bought an LSI HBA pre-flashed to IT mode along with two SAS-to-4xSATA cables. So with this HBA card added to your motherboard you get plug-and-play support for 8 more internal drives.
(3) Then I outgrew the RSV-L4500 (and I got tired of doing 3.3v mods to workaround power issues) so I bought a Netapp DS4246 [ebay.com] disk shelf that supports up to 24 hot-swap drives. I also needed to swap my HBA card for one that includes an external [ebay.com] SAS port to connect to the disk shelf. Then you need a special cable [amazon.com] to connect the disk shelf to the HBA. But again, everything is "plug and play". Note that the disk shelf is not quiet... it came with two redundant 580w power supplies, and it's built for datacenter use so the fans are beefy.
That might be more info than you're looking for, but my point here is that I wish I skipped the RSV-L4500 step and just went straight to the disk shelf. It's so convenient being able to pop a hard drive into the shelf, and not worry about power supply issues or anything like that.
Finally, I use Stablebit Drivepool [stablebit.com] to pool all of my disks into a single "drive". Makes organizing for Plex a breeze. I also enable file duplication on my pool, so I can lose any one disk and have that data automatically migrated and re-duplicated throughout the existing disk pool. Along with their Stablebit Scanner tool, all of my drives are fully scanned once every 30 days, and if it detects an issue it will even email you and start migrating data off the defective drive. It's not an efficient use of space; you can do better with RAID since you only need 1 or 2 disks for parity depending on how you set it up. But I like the simplicity of my setup and I don't mind having to have the extra storage space. I'm sure others feel differently.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I would NEVER consider using a FS that has been "work in progress" for a decade. BTRFS was a good theory, but that's it.
With Fedora 33, BTRFS is now the default fstype. I know it had some terrible growing pains early on, was hoping it matured by now that Fedora fully embraced it before I go format 14tb. XFS then on Fedora for this one?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!