Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by iconian | Staff • Feb 5, 2021
expired Posted by iconian | Staff • Feb 5, 2021

43" LG 43UN700T-B 4K UHD 3840x2160 IPS USB-C HDR 10 Monitor

+ Free Shipping

$499

$700

28% off
BuyDig
321 Comments 167,469 Views
Visit BuyDig
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Update: This deal is available again.

BuyDig.com has 43" LG 43UN700T-B 4K UHD 3840x2160 IPS USB-C HDR 10 Monitor for $646.99 - $147.99 w/ promo code WLN230 = $499. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.

Specs
  • Resolution: 3840x2160 (4K HDR)
  • Refresh Rate: 60Hz
  • Response Time: 8ms (GtG at Faster)
  • Contrast Ratio: 1000:1
  • Viewing Angle: 178/178
  • Panel Type: IPS
  • Inputs
    • DisplayPort
    • 4x HDMI
    • USB-C
    • 2x USB 3.0 Downstream

Editor's Notes

Written by SubZero5 | Staff
  • Matches a +94 Frontpage deal from September.
  • 1 Year Limited Warranty
  • Our research indicates that at the time of this post, the 43" LG 43UN700T-B 4K UHD 3840x2160 IPS USB-C HDR 10 Monitor is $96 lower (~16% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $595.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: This deal is available again.

BuyDig.com has 43" LG 43UN700T-B 4K UHD 3840x2160 IPS USB-C HDR 10 Monitor for $646.99 - $147.99 w/ promo code WLN230 = $499. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.

Specs
  • Resolution: 3840x2160 (4K HDR)
  • Refresh Rate: 60Hz
  • Response Time: 8ms (GtG at Faster)
  • Contrast Ratio: 1000:1
  • Viewing Angle: 178/178
  • Panel Type: IPS
  • Inputs
    • DisplayPort
    • 4x HDMI
    • USB-C
    • 2x USB 3.0 Downstream

Editor's Notes

Written by SubZero5 | Staff
  • Matches a +94 Frontpage deal from September.
  • 1 Year Limited Warranty
  • Our research indicates that at the time of this post, the 43" LG 43UN700T-B 4K UHD 3840x2160 IPS USB-C HDR 10 Monitor is $96 lower (~16% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $595.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+135
Good Deal
Visit BuyDig

Price Intelligence

Model: LG 43" 4K UHD IPS USB-C HDR10 Monitor

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

mtx1212
957 Posts
98 Reputation
FYI - 60hz
kobwan
233 Posts
64 Reputation
That varies. Personally I like the 4k in 43 inches because you have enough screen space for four separate monitors, each equivalent to a 22 inch 1080p screen. 32 inch is not big enough for that, you'd probably be looking at more like two slightly larger windows, or three at max if you're OK with one being kind of weird.
jbrin90
253 Posts
154 Reputation
There are monitors that are 4k at 120hz, just expensive.

320 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 5, 2021
274 Posts
Joined Mar 2004
Feb 5, 2021
daversion
Feb 5, 2021
274 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank daversion

Question: If I'm coding, have good vision, prioritize ultrasharp text... does this display or the Ultrafine LG 32 IPS for $550 @ Costco make more sense?

Obviously colors are a nice to have but really care about sharp text.

I've seen some reviews where sheer size of this are overwhelming because neck craning. Not sure if anyone who owns this can opine. TIA!
1
3
Feb 5, 2021
213 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
Feb 5, 2021
Leeboy8
Feb 5, 2021
213 Posts
Is USB-C the power source for this, what else would it be used for?
2
Feb 5, 2021
57 Posts
Joined Sep 2014
Feb 5, 2021
acha8500
Feb 5, 2021
57 Posts
Quote from daversion :
Question: If I'm coding, have good vision, prioritize ultrasharp text... does this display or the Ultrafine LG 32 IPS for $550 @ Costco make more sense?

Obviously colors are a nice to have but really care about sharp text.

I've seen some reviews where sheer size of this are overwhelming because neck craning. Not sure if anyone who owns this can opine. TIA!
If you prioritize ultra sharp text, you want as high a resolution in as small a monitor as possible. So the 32" 4K will be better than this.
5
Feb 5, 2021
957 Posts
Joined Nov 2013
Feb 5, 2021
mtx1212
Feb 5, 2021
957 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank mtx1212

FYI - 60hz
4
1
3
Feb 5, 2021
274 Posts
Joined Mar 2004
Feb 5, 2021
daversion
Feb 5, 2021
274 Posts
Quote from acha8500 :
If you prioritize ultra sharp text, you want as high a resolution in as small a monitor as possible. So the 32" 4K will be better than this.
Fair enough. I'd shift that question to experience/productivity. Is the same pixel count across a 32" or 43" better (for folks who have used both)?
1
Feb 5, 2021
233 Posts
Joined Oct 2005
Feb 5, 2021
kobwan
Feb 5, 2021
233 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank kobwan

Quote from daversion :
Fair enough. I'd shift that question to experience/productivity. Is the same pixel count across a 32" or 43" better (for folks who have used both)?
That varies. Personally I like the 4k in 43 inches because you have enough screen space for four separate monitors, each equivalent to a 22 inch 1080p screen. 32 inch is not big enough for that, you'd probably be looking at more like two slightly larger windows, or three at max if you're OK with one being kind of weird.
1
1
Feb 5, 2021
161 Posts
Joined May 2015
Feb 5, 2021
edoctor2
Feb 5, 2021
161 Posts
I know this is an odd ball use case. But this makes a great TV for those who dont like smart TVs and have a lot of modern game consoles. For console gaming this has a much lower input lag to most modern TVs.

For TV use you can put up antenna with a stand alone tuner hooked up via HDMI. But now a days most ppl watch tv through their devices so this is a minor point.
3

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 5, 2021
247 Posts
Joined Aug 2016

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

Feb 5, 2021
247 Posts
Joined Aug 2016
Feb 5, 2021
fgyygtdd4
Feb 5, 2021
247 Posts
I have this monitor (I have the other version with the stand 1 piece stand in the middle only) overall extremely happy with it. Pip mode is cool to get a firestick on the corner of the screen with news in the background. Pbp seems to work but I don't have a use for it.


Overall, great work. Monitor and the 4x 1080p screens is great!
Feb 5, 2021
253 Posts
Joined Nov 2007
Feb 5, 2021
jbrin90
Feb 5, 2021
253 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank jbrin90

Quote from fgyygtdd4 :
No monitors are 4k at 120hz. Very very very few tv's at 4k at 120hz as you need hdmi 2.1.
There are monitors that are 4k at 120hz, just expensive.
2
Feb 5, 2021
13 Posts
Joined Nov 2015
Feb 5, 2021
dmorgen518
Feb 5, 2021
13 Posts
Quote from kobwan :
That varies. Personally I like the 4k in 43 inches because you have enough screen space for four separate monitors, each equivalent to a 22 inch 1080p screen. 32 inch is not big enough for that, you'd probably be looking at more like two slightly larger windows, or three at max if you're OK with one being kind of weird.
Agreed. I have a 4k 32" monitor, and I run it at 125% scaling. At 100%, things get way too small, but that would be less of an issue at 43". That said, if the percentage of time you spend working in more than 1 or 2 windows is not that high, the size might be overwhelming the rest of the time.
Feb 5, 2021
247 Posts
Joined Aug 2016
Feb 5, 2021
fgyygtdd4
Feb 5, 2021
247 Posts
Quote from jbrin90 :
There are monitors that are 4k at 120hz, just expensive.
True, all are like triple+ the price though.


Realistically, I don't know who. Needs a 43" gaming monitor, but this isn't a gaming monitor so people shouldn't buy it specifically for that purpose. I use it for work and some light gaming.
4
Feb 5, 2021
1,125 Posts
Joined Feb 2009
Feb 5, 2021
Zumaone
Feb 5, 2021
1,125 Posts
Quote from Leeboy8 :
Is USB-C the power source for this, what else would it be used for?
The USBC would provide power and video connections to say something like a laptop. So it would make it more convenient to connect and disconnect.
Feb 5, 2021
386 Posts
Joined Dec 2008
Feb 5, 2021
kelly58
Feb 5, 2021
386 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank kelly58

I had a previous 43" LG model that cost about the same and was very highly rated. I never really liked it and was kind of pleased when it tipped over and smashed. I replaced it with a $200 43" TCL and am very content. something was "off" about the LG - my eyes were never happy.

I used both exclusively as monitors - I work from home. 43" sounds like it's too big, but it's not if you have the desk space.

Recently I bought a 43" Element for $150 and that is slightly better than the TCL. Probably the same panel with better software.

Point is that there are some really nice 43" monitors out there for very little money.
Last edited by kelly58 February 5, 2021 at 11:55 AM.
2
3

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Feb 5, 2021
107 Posts
Joined Feb 2008
Feb 5, 2021
merrimac1
Feb 5, 2021
107 Posts
I used to have a Dell 43' 4K monitor for similar work plus a bit of visualization. It fell and broken, and I had to switch to a 28' 4K monitor. I miss the 43' monitor so much! It's painful to have to go back to 28'Smilie

Quote from daversion :
Question: If I'm coding, have good vision, prioritize ultrasharp text... does this display or the Ultrafine LG 32 IPS for $550 @ Costco make more sense?

Obviously colors are a nice to have but really care about sharp text.

I've seen some reviews where sheer size of this are overwhelming because neck craning. Not sure if anyone who owns this can opine. TIA!
1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All