Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by tqlla3k • Jun 21, 2021
expired Posted by tqlla3k • Jun 21, 2021

Sony A9S 48" OLED 4k UHD HDTV - $1298 at Amazon.

$1,298

Amazon
21 Comments 12,262 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon has the Sony 48" A9S OLED UHD TV for $1298. There is 6% cashback if you have the prime card and an extra year of warranty(?)
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-XBR48...B08BZXPKFY

Its the lowest I have seen it. Sadly I just bought the LG CX with 5 year warranty and 5% discover cashback for $1250 at Costco. The LG has HDMI 2.1 and VRR support, but the Sony has better picture and sound quality.

Sigh. Is it worth the hassle of returning my LG CX for the Sony A9S?
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has the Sony 48" A9S OLED UHD TV for $1298. There is 6% cashback if you have the prime card and an extra year of warranty(?)
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-XBR48...B08BZXPKFY

Its the lowest I have seen it. Sadly I just bought the LG CX with 5 year warranty and 5% discover cashback for $1250 at Costco. The LG has HDMI 2.1 and VRR support, but the Sony has better picture and sound quality.

Sigh. Is it worth the hassle of returning my LG CX for the Sony A9S?

Community Voting

Deal Score
+3
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Sony A9S 48” Class 4K HDR OLED With Android TV XBR48A9S

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
03/02/23Best Buy$799
4
09/10/22Best Buy$800
6
08/25/22BuyDig$798 frontpage
40
08/11/22Best Buy$869
2
07/10/22Amazon$798
19
Show More
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

21 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jun 21, 2021
4,278 Posts
Joined Sep 2014
Jun 21, 2021
SuplexCity
Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jun 21, 2021
4,278 Posts
Sony does not have "better pq". All the panels are made by LG, there are differences due to panel variance and image processing but usually they are not major.

Still with the CX since it has HDMI 2.1 which is useful for consoles and gaming pcs.
7
Jun 22, 2021
4,939 Posts
Joined Jan 2011
Jun 22, 2021
sumthin_gud
Jun 22, 2021
4,939 Posts
Quote from SuplexCity :
Sony does not have "better pq". All the panels are made by LG, there are differences due to panel variance and image processing but usually they are not major.

Still with the CX since it has HDMI 2.1 which is useful for consoles and gaming pcs.
WRONG.

This is just patently false information.

The processing that's used to display the image is literally EVERYTHING

You think Vizio oled's are comparable? Because guess what, they also used LG display panels.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Regarding the two tv's OP is comparing, I personally do not know the difference so I can't say whether one is better or not. I, however, at least have the integrity to admit that I don't know. You would be best doing research through reputable sources like Rtings and HDTVtest.

"The Sony A9S Master Series OLED is an excellent TV that delivers stunning picture quality in almost every type of content. Like all OLEDs, it can produce inky blacks for a great dark room viewing experience. It has a nearly instantaneous response time and an optional Black Frame Insertion feature, resulting in clear motion in fast-moving scenes. Input lag is significantly improved over its predecessor, the Sony A9G OLED, but it still lacks variable refresh rate support. Also, it doesn't have any HDMI 2.1 ports and can't display a 4k @ 120Hz signal, which might disappoint those looking for a TV to go with their PS5 or Xbox Series X. As is the case with all OLEDs, there are risks of permanent burn-in; however, we don't expect it to be an issue for most people who watch varied content. "


I'd stick with the LG for gaming, even if the PQ is better on the Sony.
Last edited by sumthin_gud June 21, 2021 at 05:09 PM.
1
8
Original Poster
Jun 22, 2021
4,441 Posts
Joined Mar 2006
Jun 22, 2021
tqlla3k
Original Poster
Jun 22, 2021
4,441 Posts
Quote from sumthin_gud :
WRONG.

This is just patently false information.

The processing that's used to display the image is literally EVERYTHING

You think Vizio oled's are comparable? Because guess what, they also used LG display panels.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Regarding the two tv's OP is comparing, I personally do not know the difference so I can't say whether one is better or not. I, however, at least have the integrity to admit that I don't know. You would be best doing research through reputable sources like Rtings and HDTVtest instead of asking people that know less than nothing but know enough to form sentences.
I am just going off of youtube video reviews. So dont trust me on that.

But from what I gathered the Sony has more detail and is more color accurate out of the box. The Sony also has a slightly thicker/sturdier screen edge. The CX has the HDMI 2.1 for 4k@120 and VRR.

I am probably going to keep my CX due to the 5 year warranty, and the hassle of returning it. Since I use this screen every day for hours, I think the 5 year warranty my be useful.
2
Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jun 22, 2021
4,278 Posts
Joined Sep 2014
Jun 22, 2021
SuplexCity
Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jun 22, 2021
4,278 Posts
Quote from sumthin_gud :
WRONG.

This is just patently false information.

The processing that's used to display the image is literally EVERYTHING

You think Vizio oled's are comparable? Because guess what, they also used LG display panels.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Regarding the two tv's OP is comparing, I personally do not know the difference so I can't say whether one is better or not. I, however, at least have the integrity to admit that I don't know. You would be best doing research through reputable sources like Rtings and HDTVtest.

"The Sony A9S Master Series OLED is an excellent TV that delivers stunning picture quality in almost every type of content. Like all OLEDs, it can produce inky blacks for a great dark room viewing experience. It has a nearly instantaneous response time and an optional Black Frame Insertion feature, resulting in clear motion in fast-moving scenes. Input lag is significantly improved over its predecessor, the Sony A9G OLED, but it still lacks variable refresh rate support. Also, it doesn't have any HDMI 2.1 ports and can't display a 4k @ 120Hz signal, which might disappoint those looking for a TV to go with their PS5 or Xbox Series X. As is the case with all OLEDs, there are risks of permanent burn-in; however, we don't expect it to be an issue for most people who watch varied content. "

I'd stick with the LG for gaming, even if the PQ is better on the Sony.
Did you even read your own quote?

From Rtings.com:
The LG CX OLED and the Sony A9S OLED are very much alike, but the LG is a bit better, mainly due to its advanced gaming features. It can display a 4k @ 120Hz signal, and it has lower input lag and VRR support. The Sony's viewing angles are slightly wider, making it a better choice for wide seating areas. It has better gray uniformity as well; however, this varies between units.

Read the whole damn thing before commenting and confusing others.
6
Jun 22, 2021
4,939 Posts
Joined Jan 2011
Jun 22, 2021
sumthin_gud
Jun 22, 2021
4,939 Posts
Quote from tqlla3k :
I am just going off of youtube video reviews. So dont trust me on that.

But from what I gathered the Sony has more detail and is more color accurate out of the box. The Sony also has a slightly thicker/sturdier screen edge. The CX has the HDMI 2.1 for 4k@120 and VRR.

I am probably going to keep my CX due to the 5 year warranty, and the hassle of returning it. Since I use this screen every day for hours, I think the 5 year warranty my be useful.
Costco warranty doesn't cover burn in, just FYI
1
Jun 22, 2021
4,939 Posts
Joined Jan 2011
Jun 22, 2021
sumthin_gud
Jun 22, 2021
4,939 Posts
Quote from SuplexCity :
Did you even read your own quote?

From Rtings.com:
The LG CX OLED and the Sony A9S OLED are very much alike, but the LG is a bit better, mainly due to its advanced gaming features. It can display a 4k @ 120Hz signal, and it has lower input lag and VRR support. The Sony's viewing angles are slightly wider, making it a better choice for wide seating areas. It has better gray uniformity as well; however, this varies between units.

Read the whole damn thing before commenting and confusing others.
"Sony does not have "better pq". All the panels are made by LG, there are differences due to panel variance and image processing but usually they are not major."

Your own words.
It's not just the panel that makes the difference. It's how the image is processed.

"Read the whole damn thing before commenting and confusing others." SuplexCity, 2021
4
Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jun 22, 2021
4,278 Posts
Joined Sep 2014
Jun 22, 2021
SuplexCity
Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jun 22, 2021
4,278 Posts
Quote from sumthin_gud :
"Sony does not have "better pq". All the panels are made by LG, there are differences due to panel variance and image processing but usually they are not major."

Your own words.
It's not just the panel that makes the difference. It's how the image is processed.

"Read the whole damn thing before commenting and confusing others." SuplexCity, 2021
Thats my point lol

Image processing makes a different but it is not always major and its usually something like BFI, general upscaling and motion handling. Its not going to make the TV have better viewing angles, better contrast, better brightness etc, Even color accuracy can be tuned without depending on the processing.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 22, 2021
665 Posts
Joined Jan 2014
Jun 22, 2021
cheap_rich
Jun 22, 2021
665 Posts
Deleted
1
Original Poster
Jun 22, 2021
4,441 Posts
Joined Mar 2006
Jun 22, 2021
tqlla3k
Original Poster
Jun 22, 2021
4,441 Posts
Quote from sumthin_gud :
Costco warranty doesn't cover burn in, just FYI
I know, thanks for the reminder though.

I just figure, since I will be using this for 10+ hours a day, every day... its better to have a long warranty.

My Last Samsung 43" 4k developed purple spots in 2.5 years(common problem apparently), which lead me to this OLED.
Jun 22, 2021
46 Posts
Joined Nov 2018
Jun 22, 2021
Shooter_McDave
Jun 22, 2021
46 Posts
Quote from sumthin_gud :
WRONG.

This is just patently false information.

The processing that's used to display the image is literally EVERYTHING

You think Vizio oled's are comparable? Because guess what, they also used LG display panels.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Regarding the two tv's OP is comparing, I personally do not know the difference so I can't say whether one is better or not. I, however, at least have the integrity to admit that I don't know. You would be best doing research through reputable sources like Rtings and HDTVtest.

"The Sony A9S Master Series OLED is an excellent TV that delivers stunning picture quality in almost every type of content. Like all OLEDs, it can produce inky blacks for a great dark room viewing experience. It has a nearly instantaneous response time and an optional Black Frame Insertion feature, resulting in clear motion in fast-moving scenes. Input lag is significantly improved over its predecessor, the Sony A9G OLED, but it still lacks variable refresh rate support. Also, it doesn't have any HDMI 2.1 ports and can't display a 4k @ 120Hz signal, which might disappoint those looking for a TV to go with their PS5 or Xbox Series X. As is the case with all OLEDs, there are risks of permanent burn-in; however, we don't expect it to be an issue for most people who watch varied content. "


I'd stick with the LG for gaming, even if the PQ is better on the Sony.
Wow.. someone woke up on the wrong side of their parents basement this morning
4
Jun 22, 2021
300 Posts
Joined Jun 2015
Jun 22, 2021
TheMove9
Jun 22, 2021
300 Posts
Quote from sumthin_gud :
WRONG.

This is just patently false information.

The processing that's used to display the image is literally EVERYTHING

You think Vizio oled's are comparable? Because guess what, they also used LG display panels.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Regarding the two tv's OP is comparing, I personally do not know the difference so I can't say whether one is better or not. I, however, at least have the integrity to admit that I don't know. You would be best doing research through reputable sources like Rtings and HDTVtest.

"The Sony A9S Master Series OLED is an excellent TV that delivers stunning picture quality in almost every type of content. Like all OLEDs, it can produce inky blacks for a great dark room viewing experience. It has a nearly instantaneous response time and an optional Black Frame Insertion feature, resulting in clear motion in fast-moving scenes. Input lag is significantly improved over its predecessor, the Sony A9G OLED, but it still lacks variable refresh rate support. Also, it doesn't have any HDMI 2.1 ports and can't display a 4k @ 120Hz signal, which might disappoint those looking for a TV to go with their PS5 or Xbox Series X. As is the case with all OLEDs, there are risks of permanent burn-in; however, we don't expect it to be an issue for most people who watch varied content. "


I'd stick with the LG for gaming, even if the PQ is better on the Sony.
My first Oled was the Vizio 55". Wife hogged it so got myself a lg c1. Way better for gaming but movies and shows almost idential.

Every oled is amazing. Its amazing tech. Makes everything else feel ancient.
Jun 22, 2021
4,912 Posts
Joined Dec 2008
Jun 22, 2021
inquisitive
Jun 22, 2021
4,912 Posts
Quote from SuplexCity :
Sony does not have "better pq". All the panels are made by LG, there are differences due to panel variance and image processing but usually they are not major.

Still with the CX since it has HDMI 2.1 which is useful for consoles and gaming pcs.
I like the colors more on the Sony than LG...I got the LG CX though....price and warranty were too good to pass up at Costco

Also Sony OLED doesn't have the frequency of burn-in like LG if you look at history.
Last edited by inquisitive June 22, 2021 at 08:51 AM.
Original Poster
Jun 22, 2021
4,441 Posts
Joined Mar 2006
Jun 22, 2021
tqlla3k
Original Poster
Jun 22, 2021
4,441 Posts
Quote from inquisitive :
I like the colors more on the Sony than LG...I got the LG CX though....price and warranty were too good to pass up at Costco

Also Sony OLED doesn't have the frequency of burn-in like LG if you look at history.
Yeah, but the price of the Sony is now $1298, only $50 more than Costco. If you have Amazons visa, then you get 6% back and 2 year total of warranty. Would you still get the LG over to Sony?

If I didnt already buy the LG, I would have picked up this Sony. But now I dont feel like go through the hassle of unmounting my LG and returning it.
Jun 22, 2021
1,736 Posts
Joined Jun 2011
Jun 22, 2021
daveangel
Jun 22, 2021
1,736 Posts
Quote from inquisitive :
I like the colors more on the Sony than LG...I got the LG CX though....price and warranty were too good to pass up at Costco

Also Sony OLED doesn't have the frequency of burn-in like LG if you look at history.
Probably more aggressive with autodimming or ABL to prevent burn in my guess. Was actually thinking of getting this to use as PC monitor but like 2nd review on Amazon guy goes into detail why he returning it because the ABL feature so annoying to use for coding or PC.
"But the MAJOR FLAW I discovered through the course of a day or two:
If the monitor detects that it is not being used for some period of time (somewhere between five and ten minutes), it will automatically dim slightly. Shake a window around, or switch desktops, and it will brighten again. Auto-dimming when the monitor is not being used ("Monitor Idle," is what Sony calls it) is not the worst idea. The problem is that the monitor dims frequently while you are using it ... it's dim right now, since I've been typing this review. (Okay, I moved a window, now the screen is bright again.) Word processing, and even web browsing, don't seem to "count" as using the monitor, as far as Sony is concerned. Same with coding, for the most part. Sony's "Smart AI" blabbity-blah whatever will decide "oh, you must not want the monitor to be bright right now, so I'll turn it down." https://www.amazon.com/review/R1M...B08BZXPKFY

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 22, 2021
291 Posts
Joined Jan 2007
Jun 22, 2021
nyichiban
Jun 22, 2021
291 Posts
The Sony will be better despite using the same panel as LG because of their tweaking and image processing. Think of it as car manufacturers sharing the same engine but being tweaked differently. One is gonna have more horsepower than the other despite it being the same engine it started with. That being said it really depends on your use case. I mostly watch TV and Movies and play with the PS5 maybe once in a blue and the Sony has been great. The LG does have hdmi 2.1 so it gets the better of that but in all honesty it isn't for me. Also had an LG die from burn in at 13 months where my sony has been going for 4 years no issues and it was actually used more so definitely the extra tech added in the Sony is worth it as I don't need to deal with getting a replacement and no need for a sound bar because of the built in speakers behind the panel.

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All