Joined Jan 2008
L6: Expert
Forum Thread
4k switch advice?
July 6, 2021 at
12:37 PM
My problem is I have a 4k AVR that has only one hdmi out and I would like to send the signal to two 4k tvs. I don't want to duplicate the signal as I will only be watching one at a time so I just like to flip the signal from one to the other. I want it to support high speed (at least 18gb) 4k resolution (earc, ultra hd, 3d, etc). Basically I want to keep as much of the signal coming out of the AVR as possible, ie minimize signal degradation both audio and video. Anyone know of a device that works for such purpose? Thanks!
About the OP
7 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
There are some that are designed to handle multiple outputs, these are often referred to as matrix hdmi switches (search monoprice). The other option is something called an HDMI splitter that distributes the video to multiple screens simultaneously. HDCP issues are possible with some of these devices. A splitter is probably the simpler / cheaper option as you don't have to deal with remotes/ir extenders etc to switch the source (just use other hdmi inputs on the tv if you want to see different content). If you have HDCP issues try a different brand.
Some of the matrix switches distribute the video over CAT-6A (which is shielded, sometimes using multiple cables). Using ethernet type cabling is easier to install and cheaper than long hdmi cables, but could struggle with 4k.
https://www.monoprice.c
Blackbird 4K Displayport 1.4 USB 3.0 2x1 KVM Switch, 4K@60Hz, HDR, YCbCr 4:4:4, HDCP 2.2
18GB
Why do you care if it is sending signal to both devices? As long as you only turn one on, it isn't as if there is a power consumption issue. You also don't have to remember to flip the switch.
Just thinking out loud. I understand that there are "reasons" for some things, but this seems to be making things extra difficult for little reward.
Just thinking out loud. I understand that there are "reasons" for some things, but this seems to be making things extra difficult for little reward.
An HDMI splitter is simpler since you don't have to deal with pushing buttons on the switch or passing IR remote signals between rooms.
A matrix HDMI switch has advantages if you want to be able to direct different sources to each TV simultaneously. In this case you'd put it before the AVR and use it to switch the signal instead.
eg.
AVR -> 1st TV / 4 sources -> 4x2 matrix hdmi switch \ 2nd TVAn HDMI splitter is simpler since you don't have to deal with pushing buttons on the switch or passing IR remote signals between rooms.
A matrix HDMI switch has advantages if you want to be able to direct different sources to each TV simultaneously. In this case you'd put it before the AVR and use it to switch the signal instead.
eg.
AVR -> 1st TV / 4 sources -> 4x2 matrix hdmi switch \ 2nd TVFor the scenario you describe, just get an HDMI splitter.
https://www.monoprice.c
https://www.monoprice.c