Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Popular
18" Guard Dog ProShield Level IIIA Bulletproof Backpack $76 + Free Shipping w/ Prime
$76.00
$120.00
Sport.woot.com [woot.com] has 18" Guard Dog ProShield Level IIIA Bulletproof Backpack (Pink, Teal) for $75.99. Shipping is $6 or free w/ Prime.
About this deal:
At time of post, our research shows this 18" Guard Dog ProShield Level IIIA Bulletproof Backpack is $44 lower (~ 37% savings) than the next available reputable merchant's price, starting at $119.99
About this deal:
At time of post, our research shows this 18" Guard Dog ProShield Level IIIA Bulletproof Backpack is $44 lower (~ 37% savings) than the next available reputable merchant's price, starting at $119.99
in
Backpacks
(6)
Get Woot! Coupons
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Bags & Luggage Deals
View All
Frontpage
Free
(Valid through April 30)
49
66
Popular
Frontpage
$12.40
+ Free S/H on $35+
20
16
43 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Of course not. I'd be stupid to continue this conversation though. Best to you and yours, Jim.
Lol. Running away? If they're not stupid, why are they so easily fooled by their leaders? You haven't explained why they vote the way they do when they see the violence right before their eyes on a daily basis with no end in site or plans to stop it.
I've given my reasons why they vote the way they do. What are yours?
Lol. No you haven't. You said their leaders give them "lip service" about street violence, but don't actually do anything about. As a voter, you'd have to be stupid to continue to vote for that person IF that was your reason for voting for them. So either the voters in those areas DON'T CARE about the street violence at all, or they don't base their vote on that issue, or they're stupid. Which is it?
How about you give us an example of their "lip service"?
How about you give us an example of their "lip service"?
After all the questions of yours I've answered, perhaps you could answer the one I asked.
Why do inner city residents repeatedly vote for the same politicians who do little to nothing to address the actual causes of inner city violence?
Why do inner city residents repeatedly vote for the same politicians who do little to nothing to address the actual causes of inner city violence?
You haven't actually answered any questions at all. All you've done is give some generalized theory. You haven't actually given any concrete example of ANYTHING. Lol.
Why are you asking me "Why do inner city residents repeatedly vote for the same politicians who do little to nothing to address the actual causes of inner city violence?" immediately after I gave you three reasons why they might do that? Lol. You seemed to indicate you have the answer, which is why this conversation is still continuing. So you tell us why...once and for all. And provide examples of this "lip service" you refer to.
Why are you asking me "Why do inner city residents repeatedly vote for the same politicians who do little to nothing to address the actual causes of inner city violence?" immediately after I gave you three reasons why they might do that? Lol. You seemed to indicate you have the answer, which is why this conversation is still continuing. So you tell us why...once and for all. And provide examples of this "lip service" you refer to.
Specific examples are likely to be considered politically incorrect, and those comments get deleted here and most other places nowadays. So the answers I provided are what you're going to get.
So which of the three reasons you provided do you ascribe to?
1) Voters in those areas DON'T CARE about the street violence at all.
2) They don't base their vote on that issue.
3) They're stupid.
One of the above? All three?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
So which of the three reasons you provided do you ascribe to?
1) Voters in those areas DON'T CARE about the street violence at all.
2) They don't base their vote on that issue.
3) They're stupid.
One of the above? All three?
Soooo you have ZERO evidence of any "lip service". Got it. You have zero evidence to back up your theory. Interesting. I thought as much.
As far as WHY those citizens choose their leaders is for them to answer, not me. I don't know why. Nor do you. Your theory has been debunked.
As far as WHY those citizens choose their leaders is for them to answer, not me. I don't know why. Nor do you. Your theory has been debunked.
There's a cop out. A few comments ago you speculated on three reasons why they vote as they do, but now you won't actually form an opinion about what you think it is?
"Merely having an open mind is nothing. The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid."
-G.K. Chesterton
"Merely having an open mind is nothing. The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid."
-G.K. Chesterton
Lol. Cop out? Are you taking about yourself? You STILL have ZERO proof of your "theory". Did you just make it all up? Surely you had "facts" or "data", yes??? Something "solid"? Lol.
JUST LIKE YOU, I have no idea exactly why those citizens vote for their leaders. Using YOUR THEORY, I simply came up with three possible, logical scenarios as to why someone living in a violent community might vote for someone who just gave them "lip service" and didn't address the issue.
At least I tried to come to some solution. You simply make up a theory with absolutely nothing to back it up. That not how it works 😂😂😂😂😂
JUST LIKE YOU, I have no idea exactly why those citizens vote for their leaders. Using YOUR THEORY, I simply came up with three possible, logical scenarios as to why someone living in a violent community might vote for someone who just gave them "lip service" and didn't address the issue.
At least I tried to come to some solution. You simply make up a theory with absolutely nothing to back it up. That not how it works 😂😂😂😂😂
Thanks for playing, Jim!
Lol. Thanks for the laughs. What's your next unsubstantiated theory? 😂😂😂😂😂😘😘😘
That you can have a respectful, adult, and intelligent conversation with a stranger online. Unfortunately, you've proved me wrong on this one.
I see no "intelligence" in your ignorant theory. You just pulled some fake scenario out of your...um...the air. Lol. No facts. No data. No nuthin. 😂😂😂😂 That doesn't deserve "respect". I'm actually embarrassed for you.
Show us a single shred of proof. We're waiting.
Or...just keep deflecting. That's all you've done so far.