If you decide to return your purchase, HQST Solar will allow for a refund for new, undamaged, and unmodified products within 30 days of receiving the order. Returns submitted for a refund may be subject to a 10% restocking fee and shipping costs.
HQST Solar will waive the 10% restocking fee and pay for shipping in the following situations: carrier damage, a defective product, a product does not match advertising, receiving an incorrect product, or a product was an extra item that was not ordered. For any other reasons, customers are responsible for shipping fees.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
If you decide to return your purchase, HQST Solar will allow for a refund for new, undamaged, and unmodified products within 30 days of receiving the order. Returns submitted for a refund may be subject to a 10% restocking fee and shipping costs.
HQST Solar will waive the 10% restocking fee and pay for shipping in the following situations: carrier damage, a defective product, a product does not match advertising, receiving an incorrect product, or a product was an extra item that was not ordered. For any other reasons, customers are responsible for shipping fees.
The lithium technology is now becoming easily accessible to general population. 3000 charge cycle expectancy is difficult believe, offering 10 times longer lasting usability than lead acid or AGM types, or up to 5-6 times more than first generation lithium ion batteries.
This equates to minimum 10+ years life expectancy, yet priced at par with high quality commercial lead-acid batteries.
This is fabulous and unrealistic deal, but I don't believe seller's claim. If they truly believe their hardware to last minimum charge cycle of 3000, they'd be accompanied with stated warranty accordingly, that is minimum 10 years free of replacement guarantee, that is to say, free battery replacement rights to purchasers if storage capacity degraded to industry standard of 60-70% of original specification.
This really may be a quantum leap jump in battery technology everyone wants, or just a hype to find a sucker. I'd tend to believe it be be later case, as I can't find warranty replacement policy that support its claims.
There still is many merchants selling over-stated lithium batteries in eBay. I do not believe they wanted quick income by cheating someone, but they really do NOT understand the underlying battery technology. I hope merchants in this understand the items they sell to public.
LiFePO4 chemistry batteries have high cycle counts in the thousands. 3000 is a reasonable expectation for these batteries. Whether the manufacturer puts in quality cells is something buyer has to research.
123 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I'd buy if this was amazon.com, test it and either keep or return it. So since it's not I'll pass unless someone has done Max C and capacity tests and even better, like Will Prowse does, tear one down to determine the cell make/model. Stellar price if it's a good build from the cells, bms, wiring, buss bars, and case perspective.
Main takeaway:capacity is accurate, but the battery can only be connected in parallel, not in series. If you're attaching an inverter anyway, that's not too important, but if you're using it with DC equipment, your output will be limited to 1200 W.
Last edited by COMMANDAAAH November 30, 2021 at 09:29 AM.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MSG123
These batteries keep getting cheaper every year. 100Ah * 12V = 1.2 kWh. For $365, it's not the best but not the worst either. As an aside, if you're planning on building out a home power plant, make sure you go to at least 48V. So, you'll need 4 of these batteries in a series.
Also, to figure out whether you'll save money by going off grid using a battery solution, take the kWh figure, times it by 0.80 to figure in inverter losses and system losses, multiply it by your AVERAGE cost per kWh from your utility bill, and then multiply it by the amount of estimated cycles from the battery (big assumption here). The AVERAGE cost per kWh should be calculated by taking your monthly bill and dividing it by the total kWh used as determined by the electricity meter reading on the bill. You should do it for a year of readings. So, for me, this is the ROI of the battery:
1.2 kWh * 0.8 * $0.25 / kWh * 3000 = $720. Subtract out the cost of the battery incl taxes, etc..., and the net ROI is more like $320. After you include the costs of the MPPT controller, inverter, and solar panels, the difference gets closer to zero. That explains why NEM is really needed to make solar a cost efficient proposition even in high cost electricity states like CA. Once they phase out NEM 1.0 / 2.0 and implement NEM 3.0, it's likely game over for solar. The ROI will make less and less sense.
Last edited by MSG123 November 30, 2021 at 09:41 AM.
Can't speak for the batteries, though it's not that amazing of a price, since it doesn't have low temp disconnect. Better price point with higher connective options (parallel & series) fall to batteries like the chins, ampier time, and zooms. Which according to Will Prowse are basically all the same battery with different labels on them. They still are bare bones and have no low temp disconnect. These may be higher quality though, so do your research.
For those unaware of this battery type, you can use 100% of the stated amp hours, unlike lead acid agm, etc you can use about 50%. But if you charge them when they are below freezing, you can damage them and they will not work, so you must be careful when charging them in cold conditions.
If you are willing to make your own batteries, you can get even better prices, about 8 months ago you could make a 600ah pack for about $1200, but you had to wait like 3 months for shipping. Prices have jumped significantly since then.
I do however have experience with the hqst 100w compact solar panels. They have held up great over 1 year of van life. Purchased 2 more that should be arriving today, to bring my rv solar total to 500w (70% actual collection is a good estimate).
Just purchased the 100w compact solar panels and a 20 Amp MPPT controller for $127 shipped. That deal compares very well to the previously posted Renolgy 100w package deals, in part because you get a MPPT vs. PWM solar controller. Thanks OP!
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The lithium technology is now becoming easily accessible to general population. 3000 charge cycle expectancy is difficult believe, offering 10 times longer lasting usability than lead acid or AGM types, or up to 5-6 times more than first generation lithium ion batteries.
This equates to minimum 10+ years life expectancy, yet priced at par with high quality commercial lead-acid batteries.
This is fabulous and unrealistic deal, but I don't believe seller's claim. If they truly believe their hardware to last minimum charge cycle of 3000, they'd be accompanied with stated warranty accordingly, that is minimum 10 years free of replacement guarantee, that is to say, free battery replacement rights to purchasers if storage capacity degraded to industry standard of 60-70% of original specification.
This really may be a quantum leap jump in battery technology everyone wants, or just a hype to find a sucker. I'd tend to believe it be be later case, as I can't find warranty replacement policy that support its claims.
There still is many merchants selling over-stated lithium batteries in eBay. I do not believe they wanted quick income by cheating someone, but they really do NOT understand the underlying battery technology. I hope merchants in this understand the items they sell to public.
I used to sell LiFePO4 battery to hobbyists years ago. We guaranteed 80% capacity after 2000 cycles, so the battery itself is still very much usable after that. We didn't offer a 10 years warranty, just a prorated warranty based on age. It was not possible offer replacement warranty at the time, since costs were significantly higher.
Every battery chemistry has its own trade off. LiFePO4 has lower energy density than other lithium chemistry, but you get higher duty cycle, safer battery, and more usable energy as a result.
Most of our batteries were sold to ham radio people looking to operate for days without having lead acid battery drag them down.
I want to say kudos to Slickdeals because I feel like it is finally back to its glory day of good and interesting product recommendations like this one. Lately, their algorithm has generated items that simply repeats itself with different brands probably because they can get more money out of it. But from my perspective, none of the products spark any interest to get them. They need to get back on track to recommend interesting products like this one.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Hun-chan
The battery comes to $3.65/Ah. If you are willing to wait for a slow boat from China and assemble the battery/BMS yourself you can get as low as $2ish/Ah.
The battery comes to $3.65/Ah. If you are willing to wait for a slow boat from China and assemble the battery/BMS yourself you can get as low as $2ish/Ah.
Would this be a good battery to power a 12V trolling motor for a boat?
depends on the trolling motor, but for the most part yes. you just have to account for the amount of current the motor draws to figure out how much time you have before you lose trolling motor power. i say if anything, it would give you about 3-4 hours of trolling use before i would worry about it not working anymore. more than plenty for most, unless you use the trolling motor to get to your destination. then we will have to pray for the best. =)
Would this be a good battery to power a 12V trolling motor for a boat?
I'm thinking it would be fine. I have a battery box I built out not long ago with a 12v100ah lifepo4 battery (paid a lot more haha) for this purpose. I tried looking for Youtube vids of this specific battery in use for trolling motors but couldn't find any. I don't see why it wouldn't work though. Tempted to pick on up hahaha
depends on the trolling motor, but for the most part yes. you just have to account for the amount of current the motor draws to figure out how much time you have before you lose trolling motor power. i say if anything, it would give you about 3-4 hours of trolling use before i would worry about it not working anymore. more than plenty for most, unless you use the trolling motor to get to your destination. then we will have to pray for the best. =)
Need to know the average amp draw from the trolling motor, but based on a goof search 20 amps at medium seems average. For a 100 amp Jr battery you could get about 5 hrs run time at that rate. Other concern would be max amp draw, but the video review posted took the amp draw up to 200Amps and it still ran for 40 mins or so before shutting down due to overheating. Doubt a trolling motor can pull 200 amps so I think you are ok
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
These batteries keep getting cheaper every year. 100Ah * 12V = 1.2 kWh. For $365, it's not the best but not the worst either. As an aside, if you're planning on building out a home power plant, make sure you go to at least 48V. So, you'll need 4 of these batteries in a series.
Also, to figure out whether you'll save money by going off grid using a battery solution, take the kWh figure, times it by 0.80 to figure in inverter losses and system losses, multiply it by your AVERAGE cost per kWh from your utility bill, and then multiply it by the amount of estimated cycles from the battery (big assumption here). The AVERAGE cost per kWh should be calculated by taking your monthly bill and dividing it by the total kWh used as determined by the electricity meter reading on the bill. You should do it for a year of readings. So, for me, this is the ROI of the battery:
1.2 kWh * 0.8 * $0.25 / kWh * 3000 = $720. Subtract out the cost of the battery incl taxes, etc..., and the net ROI is more like $320. After you include the costs of the MPPT controller, inverter, and solar panels, the difference gets closer to zero. That explains why NEM is really needed to make solar a cost efficient proposition even in high cost electricity states like CA. Once they phase out NEM 1.0 / 2.0 and implement NEM 3.0, it's likely game over for solar. The ROI will make less and less sense.
The manufacturer explicitly says not to wire these in series....twice...on the product page. Why? I don't know.
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
This equates to minimum 10+ years life expectancy, yet priced at par with high quality commercial lead-acid batteries.
This is fabulous and unrealistic deal, but I don't believe seller's claim. If they truly believe their hardware to last minimum charge cycle of 3000, they'd be accompanied with stated warranty accordingly, that is minimum 10 years free of replacement guarantee, that is to say, free battery replacement rights to purchasers if storage capacity degraded to industry standard of 60-70% of original specification.
This really may be a quantum leap jump in battery technology everyone wants, or just a hype to find a sucker. I'd tend to believe it be be later case, as I can't find warranty replacement policy that support its claims.
There still is many merchants selling over-stated lithium batteries in eBay. I do not believe they wanted quick income by cheating someone, but they really do NOT understand the underlying battery technology. I hope merchants in this understand the items they sell to public.
123 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://youtu.be/IkoYW7kCR4I
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MSG123
Also, to figure out whether you'll save money by going off grid using a battery solution, take the kWh figure, times it by 0.80 to figure in inverter losses and system losses, multiply it by your AVERAGE cost per kWh from your utility bill, and then multiply it by the amount of estimated cycles from the battery (big assumption here). The AVERAGE cost per kWh should be calculated by taking your monthly bill and dividing it by the total kWh used as determined by the electricity meter reading on the bill. You should do it for a year of readings. So, for me, this is the ROI of the battery:
1.2 kWh * 0.8 * $0.25 / kWh * 3000 = $720. Subtract out the cost of the battery incl taxes, etc..., and the net ROI is more like $320. After you include the costs of the MPPT controller, inverter, and solar panels, the difference gets closer to zero. That explains why NEM is really needed to make solar a cost efficient proposition even in high cost electricity states like CA. Once they phase out NEM 1.0 / 2.0 and implement NEM 3.0, it's likely game over for solar. The ROI will make less and less sense.
For those unaware of this battery type, you can use 100% of the stated amp hours, unlike lead acid agm, etc you can use about 50%. But if you charge them when they are below freezing, you can damage them and they will not work, so you must be careful when charging them in cold conditions.
If you are willing to make your own batteries, you can get even better prices, about 8 months ago you could make a 600ah pack for about $1200, but you had to wait like 3 months for shipping. Prices have jumped significantly since then.
I do however have experience with the hqst 100w compact solar panels. They have held up great over 1 year of van life. Purchased 2 more that should be arriving today, to bring my rv solar total to 500w (70% actual collection is a good estimate).
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
This equates to minimum 10+ years life expectancy, yet priced at par with high quality commercial lead-acid batteries.
This is fabulous and unrealistic deal, but I don't believe seller's claim. If they truly believe their hardware to last minimum charge cycle of 3000, they'd be accompanied with stated warranty accordingly, that is minimum 10 years free of replacement guarantee, that is to say, free battery replacement rights to purchasers if storage capacity degraded to industry standard of 60-70% of original specification.
This really may be a quantum leap jump in battery technology everyone wants, or just a hype to find a sucker. I'd tend to believe it be be later case, as I can't find warranty replacement policy that support its claims.
There still is many merchants selling over-stated lithium batteries in eBay. I do not believe they wanted quick income by cheating someone, but they really do NOT understand the underlying battery technology. I hope merchants in this understand the items they sell to public.
Every battery chemistry has its own trade off. LiFePO4 has lower energy density than other lithium chemistry, but you get higher duty cycle, safer battery, and more usable energy as a result.
Most of our batteries were sold to ham radio people looking to operate for days without having lead acid battery drag them down.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Hun-chan
I used these to build a 280Ah system.
4pcs/lot VariCore 3.2V 280AH battery pack [aliexpress.com]
BMS Li-ion LiFePO4 [aliexpress.com]
I used these to build a 280Ah system.
4pcs/lot VariCore 3.2V 280AH battery pack [aliexpress.com]
BMS Li-ion LiFePO4 [aliexpress.com]
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Also, to figure out whether you'll save money by going off grid using a battery solution, take the kWh figure, times it by 0.80 to figure in inverter losses and system losses, multiply it by your AVERAGE cost per kWh from your utility bill, and then multiply it by the amount of estimated cycles from the battery (big assumption here). The AVERAGE cost per kWh should be calculated by taking your monthly bill and dividing it by the total kWh used as determined by the electricity meter reading on the bill. You should do it for a year of readings. So, for me, this is the ROI of the battery:
1.2 kWh * 0.8 * $0.25 / kWh * 3000 = $720. Subtract out the cost of the battery incl taxes, etc..., and the net ROI is more like $320. After you include the costs of the MPPT controller, inverter, and solar panels, the difference gets closer to zero. That explains why NEM is really needed to make solar a cost efficient proposition even in high cost electricity states like CA. Once they phase out NEM 1.0 / 2.0 and implement NEM 3.0, it's likely game over for solar. The ROI will make less and less sense.
Leave a Comment