This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Model: LG 27GP950-B 27” Ultragear UHD (3840 x 2160) Nano IPS Gaming Monitor w/ 1ms Response Time & 144Hz Refresh Rate, NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible with AMD FreeSync Pro, DCI-P3 98% VESA DisplayHDR 600 - Black
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
You gotta be crazy to pay $900 for that,when a nice 2K monitor is $300-350
Hard disagree.
I picked up the HDMI 2.0 version last year for around $700. This is the HDMI 2.1 version but they're mostly the same.
Factors to consider
- HDMI 2.1 vs HDMI 2.0
- 4K support vs 1440p (this makes a huge difference in price)
- 144 hz support at 4K (many monitors will cap out at 120 hz, or 60 hz at 4K)
- HDR (most monitors have really bad HDR, this one is passable at HDR-600).
- Screen size and pixel density (1440p at 32 inches looks drastically worse than 4K at 32 inches)
- Color accuracy, ghosting, and input lag
Also, if you use a monitor for console gaming (which I do), 1440p isn't supported on PS4/PS5 and HDR is not support at resolutions other than 4K on Xbox One/Xbox Series.
I picked up the HDMI 2.0 version last year for around $700. This is the HDMI 2.1 version but they're mostly the same.
Factors to consider
- HDMI 2.1 vs HDMI 2.0
- 4K support vs 1440p (this makes a huge difference in price)
- 144 hz support at 4K (many monitors will cap out at 120 hz, or 60 hz at 4K)
- HDR (most monitors have really bad HDR, this one is passable at HDR-600).
- Screen size and pixel density (1440p at 32 inches looks drastically worse than 4K at 32 inches)
- Color accuracy, ghosting, and input lag
Also, if you use a monitor for console gaming (which I do), 1440p isn't supported on PS4/PS5 and HDR is not support at resolutions other than 4K on Xbox One/Xbox Series.
I don't use it for console...
Last week,I bought Dell S3220DGF for $299.99(it was on sale),and i will never go back to anything smaller then 32" screen.
Paying $800-900 for a 27" monitor? it's crazy.I would better spendlike $200 more for a 43" LG C1 TV.
A lot of people did that! C1 is a wonderful screen
I don't use it for console...
Last week,I bought Dell S3220DGF for $299.99(it was on sale),and i will never go back to anything smaller then 32" screen.
Paying $800-900 for a 27" monitor? it's crazy.I would better spendlike $200 more for a 43" LG C1 TV.
A lot of people did that! C1 is a wonderful screen
A TV is not a monitor. Anything larger than 32 in my experience on a desk creates additional eye and neck strain.
Dell S3220DGF is 1440p which means it has 4 million less pixels than a 4K monitor. 1440p at 32 inches has a pixel density of 92 PPI while 4K at 27 inches has a 163 PPI. S3220DGF also only supports HDR-400 which hurts image quality while the LG has HDR-600 being passable for HDR. In addition, the LG has HDMI 2.1 which is important depending on your set up.
A TV is not a monitor. Anything larger than 32 in my experience on a desk creates additional eye and neck strain.
Dell S3220DGF is 1440p which means it has 4 million less pixels than a 4K monitor. 1440p at 32 inches has a pixel density of 92 PPI while 4K at 27 inches has a 163 PPI. S3220DGF also only supports HDR-400 which hurts image quality while the LG has HDR-600 being passable for HDR. In addition, the LG has HDMI 2.1 which is important depending on your set up.
You don't need to educate me,Sir!
For $900 only a silly people would buy a 27" screen
I agree 900 is a lot of dough on a 27... that dell 34 ultrawide was $650 on BF.
If you are the 900 range it better be 32in.. otherwise ultrawide.
Its not even gsync ultimate. Are you high bro... yeah its 4k 144hz but also $900 27"
Just so we understand each other. I own a 34GP950G-B, its awesome but also imo $200 over priced.. however it has the gsync module.
From bestbuy's website under product features:
"NVIDIA G-SYNC® Compatible
LG 27GP950 Monitor is a NVIDIA-tested and
officially verified G-SYNC® compatible monitor,
reducing screen tearing and minimizing stutter
for a smoother, faster gaming experience."
"NVIDIA G-SYNC® Compatible
LG 27GP950 Monitor is a NVIDIA-tested and
officially verified G-SYNC® compatible monitor,
reducing screen tearing and minimizing stutter
for a smoother, faster gaming experience."
Hi josh.
Gsync compat and gsync are not the same, please research.
G-SYNC ULTIMATE
Features the top NVIDIA G-SYNC processors to deliver the very best gaming experience, including lifelike HDR, stunning contrast, cinematic color, and ultra-low latency gameplay.
G-SYNC
Features a NVIDIA G-SYNC processor to deliver an amazing experience with no tearing, stuttering, or input lag. Enthusiasts and pro-level gamers can count on full variable refresh rate (VRR) range and variable overdrive for pristine image and outstanding gameplay.
G-SYNC COMPATIBLE
Doesn't use NVIDIA processors, but have been validated by NVIDIA to give you a good, basic variable refresh rate (VRR) experience for tear-free, stutter-free gaming.
Gsync compat and gsync are not the same, please research.
G-SYNC ULTIMATE
Features the top NVIDIA G-SYNC processors to deliver the very best gaming experience, including lifelike HDR, stunning contrast, cinematic color, and ultra-low latency gameplay.
G-SYNC
Features a NVIDIA G-SYNC processor to deliver an amazing experience with no tearing, stuttering, or input lag. Enthusiasts and pro-level gamers can count on full variable refresh rate (VRR) range and variable overdrive for pristine image and outstanding gameplay.
G-SYNC COMPATIBLE
Doesn't use NVIDIA processors, but have been validated by NVIDIA to give you a good, basic variable refresh rate (VRR) experience for tear-free, stutter-free gaming.
Idk OregonDealz, it sounds like you fell for Nvidia's marketing stunt. Can you link a video that shows real world differences?
no dude, if you didnt research yourself, well enjoy your overpriced monitor
I did research it and could not find a video that shows real world differences so I thought you could help me but I guess you rather be a prick. Thanks. I will enjoy it. It's sold out again so it must really suck.
Last edited by Josh93 December 26, 2021 at 12:14 PM.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I picked up the HDMI 2.0 version last year for around $700. This is the HDMI 2.1 version but they're mostly the same.
Factors to consider
- HDMI 2.1 vs HDMI 2.0
- 4K support vs 1440p (this makes a huge difference in price)
- 144 hz support at 4K (many monitors will cap out at 120 hz, or 60 hz at 4K)
- HDR (most monitors have really bad HDR, this one is passable at HDR-600).
- Screen size and pixel density (1440p at 32 inches looks drastically worse than 4K at 32 inches)
- Color accuracy, ghosting, and input lag
Also, if you use a monitor for console gaming (which I do), 1440p isn't supported on PS4/PS5 and HDR is not support at resolutions other than 4K on Xbox One/Xbox Series.
Leave a Comment
16 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Model:27GP950-B.AUSSKU:6
I picked up the HDMI 2.0 version last year for around $700. This is the HDMI 2.1 version but they're mostly the same.
Factors to consider
- HDMI 2.1 vs HDMI 2.0
- 4K support vs 1440p (this makes a huge difference in price)
- 144 hz support at 4K (many monitors will cap out at 120 hz, or 60 hz at 4K)
- HDR (most monitors have really bad HDR, this one is passable at HDR-600).
- Screen size and pixel density (1440p at 32 inches looks drastically worse than 4K at 32 inches)
- Color accuracy, ghosting, and input lag
Also, if you use a monitor for console gaming (which I do), 1440p isn't supported on PS4/PS5 and HDR is not support at resolutions other than 4K on Xbox One/Xbox Series.
I picked up the HDMI 2.0 version last year for around $700. This is the HDMI 2.1 version but they're mostly the same.
Factors to consider
- HDMI 2.1 vs HDMI 2.0
- 4K support vs 1440p (this makes a huge difference in price)
- 144 hz support at 4K (many monitors will cap out at 120 hz, or 60 hz at 4K)
- HDR (most monitors have really bad HDR, this one is passable at HDR-600).
- Screen size and pixel density (1440p at 32 inches looks drastically worse than 4K at 32 inches)
- Color accuracy, ghosting, and input lag
Also, if you use a monitor for console gaming (which I do), 1440p isn't supported on PS4/PS5 and HDR is not support at resolutions other than 4K on Xbox One/Xbox Series.
Last week,I bought Dell S3220DGF for $299.99(it was on sale),and i will never go back to anything smaller then 32" screen.
Paying $800-900 for a 27" monitor? it's crazy.I would better spendlike $200 more for a 43" LG C1 TV.
A lot of people did that! C1 is a wonderful screen
Last week,I bought Dell S3220DGF for $299.99(it was on sale),and i will never go back to anything smaller then 32" screen.
Paying $800-900 for a 27" monitor? it's crazy.I would better spendlike $200 more for a 43" LG C1 TV.
A lot of people did that! C1 is a wonderful screen
Dell S3220DGF is 1440p which means it has 4 million less pixels than a 4K monitor. 1440p at 32 inches has a pixel density of 92 PPI while 4K at 27 inches has a 163 PPI. S3220DGF also only supports HDR-400 which hurts image quality while the LG has HDR-600 being passable for HDR. In addition, the LG has HDMI 2.1 which is important depending on your set up.
If you are the 900 range it better be 32in.. otherwise ultrawide.
Its not even gsync ultimate. Are you high bro... yeah its 4k 144hz but also $900 27"
Just so we understand each other. I own a 34GP950G-B, its awesome but also imo $200 over priced.. however it has the gsync module.
If you are the 900 range it better be 32in.. otherwise ultrawide.
Its not even gsync ultimate. Are you high bro... yeah its 4k 144hz but also $900 27"
Just so we understand each other. I own a 34GP950G-B, its awesome but also imo $200 over priced.. however it has the gsync module.
https://slickdeals.net/f/15453859-dell-s3220dgf-32-led-curved-qhd-freesync-monitor-with-hdr-displayport-hdmi-usb-ascent-gray-dh0ny-299?src=SiteSea
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
If you are the 900 range it better be 32in.. otherwise ultrawide.
Its not even gsync ultimate. Are you high bro... yeah its 4k 144hz but also $900 27"
Just so we understand each other. I own a 34GP950G-B, its awesome but also imo $200 over priced.. however it has the gsync module.
Dell S3220DGF is 1440p which means it has 4 million less pixels than a 4K monitor. 1440p at 32 inches has a pixel density of 92 PPI while 4K at 27 inches has a 163 PPI. S3220DGF also only supports HDR-400 which hurts image quality while the LG has HDR-600 being passable for HDR. In addition, the LG has HDMI 2.1 which is important depending on your set up.
For $900 only a silly people would buy a 27" screen
If you are the 900 range it better be 32in.. otherwise ultrawide.
Its not even gsync ultimate. Are you high bro... yeah its 4k 144hz but also $900 27"
Just so we understand each other. I own a 34GP950G-B, its awesome but also imo $200 over priced.. however it has the gsync module.
"NVIDIA G-SYNC® Compatible
LG 27GP950 Monitor is a NVIDIA-tested and
officially verified G-SYNC® compatible monitor,
reducing screen tearing and minimizing stutter
for a smoother, faster gaming experience."
"NVIDIA G-SYNC® Compatible
LG 27GP950 Monitor is a NVIDIA-tested and
officially verified G-SYNC® compatible monitor,
reducing screen tearing and minimizing stutter
for a smoother, faster gaming experience."
Hi josh.
Gsync compat and gsync are not the same, please research.
G-SYNC ULTIMATE
Features the top NVIDIA G-SYNC processors to deliver the very best gaming experience, including lifelike HDR, stunning contrast, cinematic color, and ultra-low latency gameplay.
G-SYNC
Features a NVIDIA G-SYNC processor to deliver an amazing experience with no tearing, stuttering, or input lag. Enthusiasts and pro-level gamers can count on full variable refresh rate (VRR) range and variable overdrive for pristine image and outstanding gameplay.
G-SYNC COMPATIBLE
Doesn't use NVIDIA processors, but have been validated by NVIDIA to give you a good, basic variable refresh rate (VRR) experience for tear-free, stutter-free gaming.
Gsync compat and gsync are not the same, please research.
G-SYNC ULTIMATE
Features the top NVIDIA G-SYNC processors to deliver the very best gaming experience, including lifelike HDR, stunning contrast, cinematic color, and ultra-low latency gameplay.
G-SYNC
Features a NVIDIA G-SYNC processor to deliver an amazing experience with no tearing, stuttering, or input lag. Enthusiasts and pro-level gamers can count on full variable refresh rate (VRR) range and variable overdrive for pristine image and outstanding gameplay.
G-SYNC COMPATIBLE
Doesn't use NVIDIA processors, but have been validated by NVIDIA to give you a good, basic variable refresh rate (VRR) experience for tear-free, stutter-free gaming.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I picked up the HDMI 2.0 version last year for around $700. This is the HDMI 2.1 version but they're mostly the same.
Factors to consider
- HDMI 2.1 vs HDMI 2.0
- 4K support vs 1440p (this makes a huge difference in price)
- 144 hz support at 4K (many monitors will cap out at 120 hz, or 60 hz at 4K)
- HDR (most monitors have really bad HDR, this one is passable at HDR-600).
- Screen size and pixel density (1440p at 32 inches looks drastically worse than 4K at 32 inches)
- Color accuracy, ghosting, and input lag
Also, if you use a monitor for console gaming (which I do), 1440p isn't supported on PS4/PS5 and HDR is not support at resolutions other than 4K on Xbox One/Xbox Series.
Leave a Comment