Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by mcmd • Dec 28, 2021
expired Posted by mcmd • Dec 28, 2021

1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive

+ Free Shipping

$100

$130

23% off
B&H Photo Video
76 Comments 39,336 Views
Visit B&H Photo Video
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
BH Photo Video has 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) on sale for $99.99 after $30 'clipped' coupon located on the product page. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member mcmd for finding this deal.
  • Note: Back-Ordered, will ship when available.
Features:
  • 1TB Storage Capacity
  • PCIe Interface
  • M.2 2280 Form Factor
  • Up to 3500 MB/s Sequential Read Speed
  • Up to 3300 MB/s Sequential Write Speed
  • 600 TBW Endurance
  • 1.5 Million Hour MTBF
  • AES 256-Bit Encryption
  • Samsung V-NAND 3-Bit MLC Flash
  • SMART & TRIM Support

Editor's Notes

Written by persian_mafia | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Our research indicates that at the time of this post, that 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) is $13 lower (~11.5% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $112.99.
  • About this product:
    • Rated 4.8 stars out of 5 overall based on 300+ reviews on B&H Photo Video
  • About this store:
    • B&H Photo Video return policy may be found here

Original Post

Written by mcmd
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
BH Photo Video has 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) on sale for $99.99 after $30 'clipped' coupon located on the product page. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member mcmd for finding this deal.
  • Note: Back-Ordered, will ship when available.
Features:
  • 1TB Storage Capacity
  • PCIe Interface
  • M.2 2280 Form Factor
  • Up to 3500 MB/s Sequential Read Speed
  • Up to 3300 MB/s Sequential Write Speed
  • 600 TBW Endurance
  • 1.5 Million Hour MTBF
  • AES 256-Bit Encryption
  • Samsung V-NAND 3-Bit MLC Flash
  • SMART & TRIM Support

Editor's Notes

Written by persian_mafia | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Our research indicates that at the time of this post, that 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM) is $13 lower (~11.5% savings) than the next best available price from a reputable merchant with prices starting from $112.99.
  • About this product:
    • Rated 4.8 stars out of 5 overall based on 300+ reviews on B&H Photo Video
  • About this store:
    • B&H Photo Video return policy may be found here

Original Post

Written by mcmd

Community Voting

Deal Score
+67
Good Deal
Visit B&H Photo Video

Price Intelligence

Model: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB M.2 PCI Express Gen 3.0 x 4 Internal Solid-State Drive, V-NAND (MZ-V7S1T0B/AM)

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 1/24/2025, 12:50 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$114.45
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

Top Comments

The underlying technology doesn't matter that much. Actual performance matters. Modern QLC can wipe the floor with old enough SLC designs. And write endurance only matters in rare cases, so QLC is fine for 99% of us.

The only bad thing is when Samsung swapped in QLC on some cards without changing SKUs. That's a dick move. Can't trust nobody.
The 1TB deal went away for a while - looks like it is back. Good for OP for finding it again.
I could use this but I have trouble supporting this business

https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/ne...ees-571983

https://www.thephoblographer.com/...imination/

In October 2007, it was announced that B&H Photo agreed to pay US$4.3 million to settle allegations that it discriminated against Hispanic workers, while not admitting any wrongdoing.
In November 2009, a lawsuit against B&H Photo alleged that the store refused to hire women, in violation of New York City and New York State Human Rights Laws. The lawsuit, brought by four women, sought class action status on behalf of all women discriminated against by B&H over the course of many years. Given B&H's prior alleged discriminatory practices, the lawsuit sought US$19 million in compensatory and punitive damages to deter future discriminatory practices. In 2011, a lawsuit alleged discrimination against Hispanic workers.
In February 2016, the United States Department of Labor Office of Contract Compliance filed a lawsuit against B&H alleging that the company had only hired Hispanic men into entry-level jobs in a Brooklyn warehouse, and then subjected them to harassment and unsanitary conditions. On August 16, 2017, the company announced that it had settled this matter for a reported $3.22 million, while not admitting any wrongdoing.
In November 2019, According to The Verge, the Attorney General of New York state filed a lawsuit alleging that B&H knowingly failed to pay millions of dollars in sales taxes due in New York. The company's spokesperson has said that "B&H has done nothing wrong and it is outrageous". According to B&H, the Attorney General is alleging that customers should pay sales tax on pre-discounted prices, not on the actual selling price, which is the widespread industry practice.


p.s defin not getting my business- i'd be willing to pay extra $20 and buy it elsewhere.

76 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 28, 2021
1,220 Posts
Joined Oct 2008

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

Dec 29, 2021
148 Posts
Joined Jul 2016
Dec 29, 2021
enplaned
Dec 29, 2021
148 Posts
The 1TB deal went away for a while - looks like it is back. Good for OP for finding it again.
Dec 29, 2021
345 Posts
Joined Aug 2012
Dec 29, 2021
Frostillicus
Dec 29, 2021
345 Posts
It looks like the $30 off coupon is taking it down to $129, but it actually does show as $100 before tax in cart. Best deal around at the moment if your mobo doesn't support gen4.
Dec 29, 2021
671 Posts
Joined Oct 2014
Dec 29, 2021
turboc20
Dec 29, 2021
671 Posts
"3-Bit MLC"
What a funny word.
It's TLC then.

But still better than garbage QLC.
5
Dec 29, 2021
2,092 Posts
Joined Jul 2017
Dec 29, 2021
PoopyMcPoopyFace
Dec 29, 2021
2,092 Posts
Good price for a good drive.

BHP's tax eliminating credit card is pretty great. I got over $90 back this year alone, and there's no annual fee garbage to deal with. Also, dare I say it, BHP has some great used deals. My synology RAID is humming along rather nicely.
Dec 29, 2021
2,092 Posts
Joined Jul 2017
Dec 29, 2021
PoopyMcPoopyFace
Dec 29, 2021
2,092 Posts
Quote from turboc20 :
"3-Bit MLC"
What a funny word.
It's TLC then.

But still better than garbage QLC.
The underlying technology doesn't matter that much. Actual performance matters. Modern QLC can wipe the floor with old enough SLC designs. And write endurance only matters in rare cases, so QLC is fine for 99% of us.

The only bad thing is when Samsung swapped in QLC on some cards without changing SKUs. That's a dick move. Can't trust nobody.
2
Pro
Dec 29, 2021
1,377 Posts
Joined Feb 2010
Dec 29, 2021
jays_on
Pro
Dec 29, 2021
1,377 Posts
Wonder if this ones been updated to gen 4…

https://www.sammobile.com/news/sa...ontroller/

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 29, 2021
123 Posts
Joined Sep 2010
Dec 29, 2021
deerfern
Dec 29, 2021
123 Posts
Can I use this on PS5 to swap the internal HD?
Dec 29, 2021
182 Posts
Joined Apr 2010
Dec 29, 2021
sahakiel
Dec 29, 2021
182 Posts
Quote from turboc20 :
"3-Bit MLC"
What a funny word.
It's TLC then.

But still better than garbage QLC.
Actually the "M" in MLC stands for "multi" or "multiple". It refers to the ability to store and address more than two voltage levels. Samsung is technically correct. This is the older nomenclature for storing multiple bits per flash cell.

Going by the "TLC", and "QLC" nomenclature, two bit MLC would be named something like "DLC" for "dual" or "double". TLC and QLC are purely marketing terms for retail consumers (enthusiasts) to differentiate flash types and aren't actually used in an engineering setting.

This is a similar issue to what Intel faced with their process nodes. For a long time, they denoted their process using (I think) the gate length. TSMC's 12nm process, on the other hand, actually didn't refer to any physical measure. It was a marketing term to denote density and generational changes and the transistor density was usually a bit worse than what used to be Intel's 14nm process at the time. That is why Intel finally caved and renamed their 10nm process to Intel 7, to denote that its similar performance and density to TSMC's 7nm.