This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
I own this monitor. And while it is excellent, I think this sale price should really be the everyday price. $480 is absurd.
On a side note, if you do end up purchasing this monitor there have been many online complaints about the brightness and that is because Samsung defaults one of the settings to Eco mode and it's buried and hard to find.
What would you suggest for 3 * 4K in portrait mode side by side on a work desk about 2 feet from my face when typing ?
do they have to be 4k? I would do 3 * 1440p 27" ones in portrait mode. the KEY is to make sure they are IPS panels. if you get other when you tilt 90* you will get some issues with viewing angles and color.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Jan 18, 2022 12:11 AM
1.6K Comments
Joined Jul 2019
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.
Can you share a better option for gaming/sports/movies?
My point is that most TVs are 60hz and most content is as well. Even if you have a 120hz TV, you should likely have motion handling off for most content and then you are essentially watching the exact same basic specs as this monitor.
If you want 144hz or 165hz monitors then by all means, but to say that you can't watch sports or action movies is just garbage talk.
I prefer a 27" 4k monitor to 1440p. No, I can't use 4k at native resolution at that size, but I do like it scaled a little smaller than 1440k, so I still fit more on a screen than 1440k. Text is a bit crisper as well.
I was worried about system resources with scaling, but it hasn't been an issue in the slightest. FWIW I'm not gaming on it.
ew, VA. what am I, some of the college kid who that can't afford his IPS and 165hz too?
Another ridiculous comment. IPS is NOT inherently better than VA. They each have strengths and weaknesses. There are certain cases where you want an IPS panel and some where VA is better. Get educated!
do they have to be 4k? I would do 3 * 1440p 27" ones in portrait mode. the KEY is to make sure they are IPS panels. if you get other when you tilt 90* you will get some issues with viewing angles and color.
They do have to be 4k as I need the vertical resolution in order to see the entire GUI of the software I use 10 hours per day, 7 days per week
I currently have 2*43 inch 4k LCDs side-by-side in portrait and a third LG48C1 in landscape to the left of that, but I don't like having to look so high up / move my neck to see the top 1/3 of the portrait monitors, which is why I'm thinking of going smaller but at the same resolution... I am also considering a single 55-inch 8K monitor that would give me roughly 3 "zones" of 2400x4096 resolution on the same monitor... halp!
Top Comments
On a side note, if you do end up purchasing this monitor there have been many online complaints about the brightness and that is because Samsung defaults one of the settings to Eco mode and it's buried and hard to find.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
78 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
If you want 144hz or 165hz monitors then by all means, but to say that you can't watch sports or action movies is just garbage talk.
I was worried about system resources with scaling, but it hasn't been an issue in the slightest. FWIW I'm not gaming on it.
I currently have 2*43 inch 4k LCDs side-by-side in portrait and a third LG48C1 in landscape to the left of that, but I don't like having to look so high up / move my neck to see the top 1/3 of the portrait monitors, which is why I'm thinking of going smaller but at the same resolution... I am also considering a single 55-inch 8K monitor that would give me roughly 3 "zones" of 2400x4096 resolution on the same monitor... halp!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!