This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Decent movie unfortunately Disney has been doing terrible transfers on their movies lately, almost feels intentional at this point!
I get people often prefer the convenience of digital but for us that prefer better quality it sucks! 😡
It's really been their whole collection of 4K movies. They all feature 2K transfers with HDR but lack a Dolby Vision version. More recently Disney has at least moved up the quality of the digital copies to include Dolby Vision.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It's really been their whole collection of 4K movies. They all feature 2K transfers with HDR but lack a Dolby Vision version. More recently Disney has at least moved up the quality of the digital copies to include Dolby Vision.
I've read that before and my guess is ultimately they are trying to push everyone to their digital platform where they have much more control on their content.
Unfortunately too often people have a misconception that what a movie is shot in will tell you how well it looks/sounds.
Truthfully it's in the transfer, If it involves HDR then how well that content is processed/converted and how well your display can take advantage of that content.
Generally any form of digital HDR is inferior compared to disc.
Often if you compare digital DV(HDR) vs HDR10 on disc, disc will be better.
The caveat here is having good equipment and proper setup plays a critical role with this.
On the AQ side it's not even a conversation/debate, disc is better by a significant margin.
Decent movie unfortunately Disney has been doing terrible transfers on their movies lately, almost feels intentional at this point!
I get people often prefer the convenience of digital but for us that prefer better quality it sucks! 😡
Disney Also seems to be deliberately limiting their HDR options to only HDR10 on UHD discs yet including Dolby vision on streaming both through Disney+ and even a few "vendors" when you stream the title with the redeemed movies anywhere code. Seems to be trickling into even at least new Fox releases now that Disney owns 20th Century Studios.
I've heard Disney has had pain points in mastering UHD discs with high bitrates (and especially lacking triple layer discs) so perhaps that's why. Mastering a disc with high bitrate and (especially the FEL variant of DV that adds quite a bit more on top) gets tricky when you are at the boundaries of discs on the inner track so you get a lower transfer rate at the same angular velocity. Only Black Panther and The Last Jedi UHD titles have included DV that I've come across...
Last edited by hceuterpe April 11, 2022 at 03:52 PM.
Disney Also seems to be deliberately limiting their HDR options to only HDR10 on UHD discs yet including Dolby vision on streaming both through Disney+ and even a few "vendors" when you stream the title with the redeemed movies anywhere code. Seems to be trickling into even at least new Fox releases now that Disney owns 20th Century Studios.
I've heard Disney has had pain points in mastering UHD discs with high bitrates (and especially lacking triple layer discs) so perhaps that's why. Mastering a disc with high bitrate and (especially the FEL variant of DV that adds quite a bit more on top) gets tricky when you are at the boundaries of discs on the inner track so you get a lower transfer rate at the same angular velocity. Only Black Panther and The Last Jedi UHD titles have included DV that I've come across...
If that's the case it doesn't make much sense since bit rates are even more restrictive streaming and you still need to offer HDR for people that can't display DV.
Why would they bother to make a DV transfer just for digital viewing unless you want people to believe the digital offers an "upgrade" over disc, which is not necessarily true.
The other I have tried is Captain Marvel and IMO digital DV really adds no advantage over disc HDR.
AQ wise there is a significant drop in quality with streaming.
If that's the case it doesn't make much sense since bit rates are even more restrictive streaming and you still need to offer HDR for people that can't display DV.
Why would they bother to make a DV transfer just for digital viewing unless you want people to believe the digital offers an "upgrade" over disc, which is not necessarily true.
The other I have tried is Captain Marvel and IMO digital DV really adds no advantage over disc HDR.
AQ wise there is a significant drop in quality with streaming.
For streaming, it's actually a simple matter to pick and choose separate streams depending on what the end user's device can handle. So in essence the server only sends what the player can handle.
UHD on the other hand has to contain everything and essentially layer it according to what the overall setup can handle. It's why UHD discs have Profile 7 DV (dual with a HDR10 base and either MEL or FEL DV enhancement layer), but streaming only contains a single layer so no other base HDR format to fall back on.
It's even more prevalent with audio. Atmos on discs rides on top of True HD, which in turn usually contains a Dolby digital core. DTS:X is on top of DTS HD MA, which in turn always has a DTS core track.
Last edited by hceuterpe April 11, 2022 at 06:26 PM.
For streaming, it's actually a simple matter to pick and choose separate streams depending on what the end user's device can handle. So in essence the server only sends what the player can handle.
UHD on the other hand has to contain everything and essentially layer it according to what the overall setup can handle. It's why UHD discs have Profile 7 DV (dual with a HDR10 base and either MEL or FEL DV enhancement layer), but streaming only contains a single layer so no other base HDR format to fall back on.
It's even more prevalent with audio. Atmos on discs rides on top of True HD, which in turn usually contains a Dolby digital core. DTS:X is on top of DTS HD MA, which in turn always has a DTS core track.
Not sure I follow, we are talking about UHD streaming content vs UHD disc content.
All forms of HDR has to be downscaled to current displays.
HDR10 is static HDR and DV is dynamic HDR. Since DV is proprietary The content can't be manipulated whereas HDR can and usually is.
In short that's why many times DV is marginally better than HDR depending on your equipment.
Still make since why Disney only does this on just a few movies.
Again on the AQ side it's not a debate, even BD disc AQ is better than streaming 4K Atmos/X.
I've read that before and my guess is ultimately they are trying to push everyone to their digital platform where they have much more control on their content.
Unfortunately too often people have a misconception that what a movie is shot in will tell you how well it looks/sounds.
Truthfully it's in the transfer, If it involves HDR then how well that content is processed/converted and how well your display can take advantage of that content.
Generally any form of digital HDR is inferior compared to disc.
Often if you compare digital DV(HDR) vs HDR10 on disc, disc will be better.
The caveat here is having good equipment and proper setup plays a critical role with this.
On the AQ side it's not even a conversation/debate, disc is better by a significant margin.
I agree that physical is always going to offer the best quality. Digital can offer decent quality but a major part of a digital solution relies on a reliable ISP that many don't have and so compression is typically always a big factor.
Whether it's the movie or game industry digital distribution is always something that the industries would prefer as it increases their profits not having to sell through retail outlets.
Disney's opting to (to my knowledge) not release a single physical Dolby Vision or true 4K release seems to indicate they would rather people buy digital. I get that a lot of CG editing is done in 2K so releasing a 4K movie with 2K post-production work can be "jarring". And I've heard it's for this reason that many film releases in 4K are simply 2K releases.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I agree that physical is always going to offer the best quality. Digital can offer decent quality but a major part of a digital solution relies on a reliable ISP that many don't have and so compression is typically always a big factor.
Whether it's the movie or game industry digital distribution is always something that the industries would prefer as it increases their profits not having to sell through retail outlets.
Disney's opting to (to my knowledge) not release a single physical Dolby Vision or true 4K release seems to indicate they would rather people buy digital. I get that a lot of CG editing is done in 2K so releasing a 4K movie with 2K post-production work can be "jarring". And I've heard it's for this reason that many film releases in 4K are simply 2K releases.
Still lost me, how does Disney opt out of "true 4K" with UHD content on disc?
That implies digital UHD is true 4K?
You believe they transfer a movie in "true 4K" for streaming and make a different 2K transfer for disc?
So whatever 2K is, it's not UHD?
I think most if not all Disney UHD disc I own are transferred to include HDR10.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
19 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I get people often prefer the convenience of digital but for us that prefer better quality it sucks! 😡
I get people often prefer the convenience of digital but for us that prefer better quality it sucks! 😡
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Unfortunately too often people have a misconception that what a movie is shot in will tell you how well it looks/sounds.
Truthfully it's in the transfer, If it involves HDR then how well that content is processed/converted and how well your display can take advantage of that content.
Generally any form of digital HDR is inferior compared to disc.
Often if you compare digital DV(HDR) vs HDR10 on disc, disc will be better.
The caveat here is having good equipment and proper setup plays a critical role with this.
On the AQ side it's not even a conversation/debate, disc is better by a significant margin.
I get people often prefer the convenience of digital but for us that prefer better quality it sucks! 😡
I've heard Disney has had pain points in mastering UHD discs with high bitrates (and especially lacking triple layer discs) so perhaps that's why. Mastering a disc with high bitrate and (especially the FEL variant of DV that adds quite a bit more on top) gets tricky when you are at the boundaries of discs on the inner track so you get a lower transfer rate at the same angular velocity. Only Black Panther and The Last Jedi UHD titles have included DV that I've come across...
I've heard Disney has had pain points in mastering UHD discs with high bitrates (and especially lacking triple layer discs) so perhaps that's why. Mastering a disc with high bitrate and (especially the FEL variant of DV that adds quite a bit more on top) gets tricky when you are at the boundaries of discs on the inner track so you get a lower transfer rate at the same angular velocity. Only Black Panther and The Last Jedi UHD titles have included DV that I've come across...
Why would they bother to make a DV transfer just for digital viewing unless you want people to believe the digital offers an "upgrade" over disc, which is not necessarily true.
The other I have tried is Captain Marvel and IMO digital DV really adds no advantage over disc HDR.
AQ wise there is a significant drop in quality with streaming.
Why would they bother to make a DV transfer just for digital viewing unless you want people to believe the digital offers an "upgrade" over disc, which is not necessarily true.
The other I have tried is Captain Marvel and IMO digital DV really adds no advantage over disc HDR.
AQ wise there is a significant drop in quality with streaming.
UHD on the other hand has to contain everything and essentially layer it according to what the overall setup can handle. It's why UHD discs have Profile 7 DV (dual with a HDR10 base and either MEL or FEL DV enhancement layer), but streaming only contains a single layer so no other base HDR format to fall back on.
It's even more prevalent with audio. Atmos on discs rides on top of True HD, which in turn usually contains a Dolby digital core. DTS:X is on top of DTS HD MA, which in turn always has a DTS core track.
UHD on the other hand has to contain everything and essentially layer it according to what the overall setup can handle. It's why UHD discs have Profile 7 DV (dual with a HDR10 base and either MEL or FEL DV enhancement layer), but streaming only contains a single layer so no other base HDR format to fall back on.
It's even more prevalent with audio. Atmos on discs rides on top of True HD, which in turn usually contains a Dolby digital core. DTS:X is on top of DTS HD MA, which in turn always has a DTS core track.
All forms of HDR has to be downscaled to current displays.
HDR10 is static HDR and DV is dynamic HDR. Since DV is proprietary The content can't be manipulated whereas HDR can and usually is.
In short that's why many times DV is marginally better than HDR depending on your equipment.
Still make since why Disney only does this on just a few movies.
Again on the AQ side it's not a debate, even BD disc AQ is better than streaming 4K Atmos/X.
Unfortunately too often people have a misconception that what a movie is shot in will tell you how well it looks/sounds.
Truthfully it's in the transfer, If it involves HDR then how well that content is processed/converted and how well your display can take advantage of that content.
Generally any form of digital HDR is inferior compared to disc.
Often if you compare digital DV(HDR) vs HDR10 on disc, disc will be better.
The caveat here is having good equipment and proper setup plays a critical role with this.
On the AQ side it's not even a conversation/debate, disc is better by a significant margin.
Whether it's the movie or game industry digital distribution is always something that the industries would prefer as it increases their profits not having to sell through retail outlets.
Disney's opting to (to my knowledge) not release a single physical Dolby Vision or true 4K release seems to indicate they would rather people buy digital. I get that a lot of CG editing is done in 2K so releasing a 4K movie with 2K post-production work can be "jarring". And I've heard it's for this reason that many film releases in 4K are simply 2K releases.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Whether it's the movie or game industry digital distribution is always something that the industries would prefer as it increases their profits not having to sell through retail outlets.
Disney's opting to (to my knowledge) not release a single physical Dolby Vision or true 4K release seems to indicate they would rather people buy digital. I get that a lot of CG editing is done in 2K so releasing a 4K movie with 2K post-production work can be "jarring". And I've heard it's for this reason that many film releases in 4K are simply 2K releases.
That implies digital UHD is true 4K?
You believe they transfer a movie in "true 4K" for streaming and make a different 2K transfer for disc?
So whatever 2K is, it's not UHD?
I think most if not all Disney UHD disc I own are transferred to include HDR10.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!