Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by Turtile • May 18, 2022
expired Posted by Turtile • May 18, 2022

10-Oz Skinnygirl Sugar Free Preserves (Apricot Mimosa)

$3.00

$6.79

55% off
Amazon
28 Comments 12,185 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon has 10-Oz Skinnygirl Sugar Free Preserves (Apricot Mimosa) on sale for $2.97. Shipping is free with Prime or orders $25 or more.

Note: Usually ships within 2 to 5 weeks.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Turtile for finding this deal.


Editor's Notes

Written by Corwin | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This 10-Oz Skinnygirl Sugar Free Preserves (Apricot Mimosa) is priced $3 lower (50% savings) than the listed "was" price.
    • Refer to the forum thread for additional details and discussion.
  • About this store:

Original Post

Written by Turtile
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon has 10-Oz Skinnygirl Sugar Free Preserves (Apricot Mimosa) on sale for $2.97. Shipping is free with Prime or orders $25 or more.

Note: Usually ships within 2 to 5 weeks.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Turtile for finding this deal.


Editor's Notes

Written by Corwin | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This 10-Oz Skinnygirl Sugar Free Preserves (Apricot Mimosa) is priced $3 lower (50% savings) than the listed "was" price.
    • Refer to the forum thread for additional details and discussion.
  • About this store:

Original Post

Written by Turtile

Community Voting

Deal Score
+15
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Skinnygirl Sugar Free Preserves, Apricot Mimosa, 10 Ounce

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
04/26/25Amazon$2.82
6
08/15/23Amazon$2.80 frontpage
59
05/01/23Amazon$2.80 frontpage
57
02/03/23Amazon$2.80 frontpage
41

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 7/15/2025, 11:12 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$4.99

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

bsdc
1421 Posts
882 Reputation
Sweetened with sucralose, for those looking for the answer. I don't have a problem with sucralose, personally.
cannono
1191 Posts
382 Reputation
The single study referenced here was done via in vitro high concentration exposure, which does not occur in the human diet. Unfortunately, the study does not offer any conclusive insight on shorter and lower exposure within a metabolic environment.

There are studies that show harm when in vitro cells are exposed for days at a time to water or salt at high concentrations too - which doesn't actually tell us that moderate or low concentrations of those things are bad either.

Having read the study, I also find it interesting that they claim taste receptors are were a factor in whether there were significant effects - with the taste blocker application also seemingly negating effects of the sweeteners. This makes me wonder why they didn't test sugar, which itself would trigger taste response then and should be compared.

Current global scientific consensus has not found the consumption of artificial sweeteners to be harmful. To suggest there is conclusive evidence of such is not accurate, but citing a single study indicates some reactionary messaging is present when people try to perpetuate fear of sweeteners.
cannono
1191 Posts
382 Reputation
Current science does not support the implication or claim that these ingredients have a negative impact on health. To suggest people who care about their health should care about these ingredients is just suggesting people should have fear or concern for something because they were told to, not because it is true.

So no, people should not be made to worry about sweeteners at this time. There is no scientific consensus against them whatsoever. Sweeteners are studied internationally by many independent research teams and markets. Aspartame itself is arguably the most studied food subject ever at this point - it has been shown to be safe in dietary form for many many decades.

Someone could come in here and say "there's bad stuff in this" and someone could post any flawed basis for their belief. And that's just not at all rational to be concerned by or planned around for your diet.

27 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

May 19, 2022
26,287 Posts
Joined May 2006

This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.

May 19, 2022
1,053 Posts
Joined Mar 2005
May 19, 2022
Pravianti
May 19, 2022
1,053 Posts
Quote from namlook :
We will agree to disagree that just because there isn't a consensus on something that no one should have a healthy level of concern and proceed with caution as they see fit. There's no need to consume artificial sweeteners to live a healthy and happy life so if people choose not to consume them when there are some red flags that have not been thoroughly studied does not represent irrational behavior.
There's also no need to consume SlickDeals. And given how much this site has been PROVEN to cause severe cases of walletus emptius for many thousands of individuals, I would suggest serious caution with this product that has been known to cause harm in the state of California and probably elsewhere!
1
May 19, 2022
2,681 Posts
Joined May 2006
May 19, 2022
eegorr
May 19, 2022
2,681 Posts
OOS already?
May 19, 2022
265 Posts
Joined Sep 2013
May 19, 2022
ashman4827
May 19, 2022
265 Posts
already gone...
May 19, 2022
184 Posts
Joined Dec 2008
May 19, 2022
Alyunya
May 19, 2022
184 Posts
Seems to have expired
Pro
May 19, 2022
5,364 Posts
Joined Aug 2016
May 19, 2022
JenT4685
Pro
May 19, 2022
5,364 Posts
Quote from Mr.Dewalt :
some other flavors have 6 pack for similar price, I.e. 6 pack blackberry priced at $16.83 = $2.8 * 6. Yet you need to order 6 of them
Shame the strawberry is the only one not at that price.
May 19, 2022
162 Posts
Joined Apr 2009
May 19, 2022
goochute
May 19, 2022
162 Posts
Appears the deal is dead

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

May 19, 2022
235 Posts
Joined Mar 2021
May 19, 2022
GreySquirrel365
May 19, 2022
235 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank GreySquirrel365

Quote from namlook :
We will agree to disagree that just because there isn't a consensus on something that no one should have a healthy level of concern and proceed with caution as they see fit. There's no need to consume artificial sweeteners to live a healthy and happy life so if people choose not to consume them when there are some red flags that have not been thoroughly studied does not represent irrational behavior.
If you're someone who already eats a super healthy diet, are active, and a healthy weight then, sure no reason to add artificial sweeteners.
But if you're like many who are overweight and use this as a substitute for sugar laden products, then that's (at least based on current evidence) a great option. Obesity is known to cause many issues and negative health effects, so lessening a known evil in exchange for a probably non-evil is a rational choice.
1
May 19, 2022
3,637 Posts
Joined Nov 2008
May 19, 2022
CollegeRamenEat
May 19, 2022
3,637 Posts
The name and flavor definitely fit the demographic they're vying for
May 19, 2022
249 Posts
Joined Jul 2021
May 19, 2022
SharpDesk9865
May 19, 2022
249 Posts
Quote from cannono :
Which ones are bad for you? Please explain.
Should take you seconds to search for the info. Here's a little on maltodextrin:

https://www.mdvip.com/about-mdvip...ltodextrin

Sodium benzoate? Perhaps in engine coolant, but not in my food:

https://www.healthline.com/nutrit...m-benzoate
Last edited by SharpDesk9865 May 18, 2022 at 10:31 PM.
1
May 19, 2022
8,261 Posts
Joined Oct 2008
May 19, 2022
DontTaxBeer
May 19, 2022
8,261 Posts
Quote from rly723 :
I usually buy smuckers sugar free but those have increased to $4-5. Just ordered Walmart great value strawberry sugar free for $2.44 each. Only because I have Walmart+ 90 day trial and free shipping. For the longest time, I didn't eat much toast jam and peanut butter, but it's been my snack alternative or quick breakfast the past month or so. Plus i have multiple loaves of bread taking up space in freezer that needs to be eaten. The apricot smuckers sugar free is pretty good so hopefully this is comparable. That said, these sugar free preserves in general, texture wise aren't like regular ones but for no sugar and only 10 calories per serving it's good enough. I do use natural peanut butter in moderation, using only 1 tbsp at a time and just account for those 95 calories
I prefer the Palmer to Smuckers. i find the taste far superior. but thats just me.
Jun 19, 2022
312 Posts
Joined Mar 2008
Jun 19, 2022
Scrooged
Jun 19, 2022
312 Posts
Quote from DontTaxBeer :
I prefer the Palmer to Smuckers. i find the taste far superior. but thats just me.
Do you mean Polaner? If so, I agree. My favorite is Smuckers Sugar Free Apricot and was hoping the skinnygirl would fill the bill but not quite. Unfortunately Wallmart seems to have stopped carrying it. Plus the skinnygirl is 10 oz whereas the Smuckers is 12.75 oz.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All