expired Posted by DrBargin • Jul 3, 2022
Jul 3, 2022 9:51 PM
Item 1 of 6
Item 1 of 6
expired Posted by DrBargin • Jul 3, 2022
Jul 3, 2022 9:51 PM
Select Target Stores:1-oz Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion (SPF 70)
(In-Store Only w/ Target Circle Coupon)Free
$1.99
Target
Visit TargetGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
48 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Nevemind...that is my Target Circle savings amount.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank PocketsThick
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank cannono
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment