Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
Select Target Stores:1-oz Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion (SPF 70) Expired
Free
(In-Store Only w/ Target Circle Coupon)
Select Target Stores have 1-oz Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion (SPF 70) on sale for $1.99 - $2 Off Manufacturer Target Circle Coupon [Free to Join] valid for in-store purchase only.
- Note: Availability/pricing may vary by stores; may not be available in all areas. Must login to your Target account to save this offer to utilize it for in-store purchase only.
Original Post
Written by
Edited July 4, 2022
at 11:22 PM
Target has Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion - SPF 70 (1 fl oz) for Free after "clipping" $2 off coupon. Valid In-Store Only.
https://www.target.com/p/neutroge...A-80839020
https://www.target.com/p/neutroge...A-80839020
in
Skin Care
(5)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Health & Beauty Deals
View AllFrontpage
$14.50
w/ Subscribe & Save
25
21
Frontpage
$49.65
w/ Subscribe & Save + Free S/H
28
38
Frontpage
Frontpage
$8.15
w/ Subscribe & Save & More
25
16
Price Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: Neutrogena Beach Defense Sunscreen Lotion - SPF 70 - 1 fl oz
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
49 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
You can read more about it here:
https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/rep...chemicals/
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I do!
hmm, good point, i will try again, and grab other items on the transaction.
They have inconsistent classifications (they grade same ingredients at different alert levels per product based on an opaque editorial staff) and they generate revenue from articles that are intentionally contrarian, often asserting unproven "health" claims in favor of some products and skeptical of others in ways that contradict the scientific information we have. It conveniently attracts high clicks to drop these shocking revelations that "you may not want to use these " with no clear consensus about why.
They accept money from brands as a primary source of their funding, addressing topics in a manner that is favorable to the brands. They have a pay-based label certification they sell to companies, which incentivizes EWG to promote specific product categories that can then be certified.
Many science professionals and groups have rebuked their low-information tactics and industry/political ties. I suggest doing a search, but they are influential for anything BUT unbiased information. They are motivated by funding to leverage product characteristics that are not scientific.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/05...-you-11323
https://en.m.wikipedia.
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4623
Please don't present ACSH as not having an agenda, either. Their "articles" are as poorly written as some right-wing blogs and the content/tone reflects that general vein of thinking. Hardly objective, and the fact it's a non profit has nothing to do with anything. Many industry nonprofits are mouthpieces too.