This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
I use a Thinkpad T400 with P8400 core2 duo at work every day... it's 2% faster. It should have no problem doing simple word processing and looking at YT videos.
I use a Thinkpad T400 with P8400 core2 duo at work every day... it's 2% faster. It should have no problem doing simple word processing and looking at YT videos.
I still have a Dell Studio with a P8600 and a Radeon 3650 that blows the pants off something like this.
These AMD excavator cores at low speeds just do not hold up. There's only one FPU for both cores to use and they get bogged down with any kind of web browsing, and you can forget about multitasking. That design only makes sense when there's 3-4 modules (6-8 cores) and higher clock speeds.
No exaggeration, these feel like single cores the moment you need to do anything.
I still have a Dell Studio with a P8600 and a Radeon 3650 that blows the pants off something like this.
These AMD excavator cores at low speeds just do not hold up. There's only one FPU for both cores to use and they get bogged down with any kind of web browsing, and you can forget about multitasking. That design only makes sense when there's 3-4 modules (6-8 cores) and higher clock speeds.
No exaggeration, these feel like single cores the moment you need to do anything.
Thank you for the voice of experience... I have not dealt with one, just went off the benchmark.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Thank you for the voice of experience... I have not dealt with one, just went off the benchmark.
It's all good. One way to tell if a dual core is a weak one with passmark is to compare the raw data below the score.
Floating point math in passmark is a single threaded test. The 9120c tops out at 1709MOps at 2.4Ghz (and there's only one FPU in total) whereas the P8400 at 2.2ghz has 2,073 MOps per core. Random string sorting is also far higher on the P8400 as well.
In many real world scenarios the P8400 is up to 2x faster. The only thing these AMD excavator cores have is some newer instructions that speed up certain tasks, but there's simply not enough oomph behind it to make a difference.
This CPU is no different than an Athlon 64 x2 4400+.
For anyone else not in the know, it was slow 8 years ago. This is a no go.
For further reference, I think I built a mid-low range gaming PC with an athlon 64 x2 like that in 2008. It was neither new nor especially fast then, over 14 years ago. We're talking a year before the first android phones hit the market.
I'm all for using low spec hardware that's just good enough, but this should be reserved for the folks whose budgets are capped at exactly $50. It will prove frustrating for most. I bought a low end Chromebook a few years ago for like $100. It was one of those that people said "if I just need it for email YouTube it will be okay." It was never okay and lagged like there was no tomorrow, or like it was waiting to see if there was no tomorrow so it didn't have to keep trying.
Last edited by SeanD1497 October 26, 2022 at 02:08 PM.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
32 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://www.cpubenchmar
https://www.cpubenchmar
I use a Thinkpad T400 with P8400 core2 duo at work every day... it's 2% faster. It should have no problem doing simple word processing and looking at YT videos.
https://www.cpubenchmar
For anyone else not in the know, it was slow 8 years ago. This is a no go.
I use a Thinkpad T400 with P8400 core2 duo at work every day... it's 2% faster. It should have no problem doing simple word processing and looking at YT videos.
These AMD excavator cores at low speeds just do not hold up. There's only one FPU for both cores to use and they get bogged down with any kind of web browsing, and you can forget about multitasking. That design only makes sense when there's 3-4 modules (6-8 cores) and higher clock speeds.
No exaggeration, these feel like single cores the moment you need to do anything.
These AMD excavator cores at low speeds just do not hold up. There's only one FPU for both cores to use and they get bogged down with any kind of web browsing, and you can forget about multitasking. That design only makes sense when there's 3-4 modules (6-8 cores) and higher clock speeds.
No exaggeration, these feel like single cores the moment you need to do anything.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Floating point math in passmark is a single threaded test. The 9120c tops out at 1709MOps at 2.4Ghz (and there's only one FPU in total) whereas the P8400 at 2.2ghz has 2,073 MOps per core. Random string sorting is also far higher on the P8400 as well.
In many real world scenarios the P8400 is up to 2x faster. The only thing these AMD excavator cores have is some newer instructions that speed up certain tasks, but there's simply not enough oomph behind it to make a difference.
For anyone else not in the know, it was slow 8 years ago. This is a no go.
I'm all for using low spec hardware that's just good enough, but this should be reserved for the folks whose budgets are capped at exactly $50. It will prove frustrating for most. I bought a low end Chromebook a few years ago for like $100. It was one of those that people said "if I just need it for email YouTube it will be okay." It was never okay and lagged like there was no tomorrow, or like it was waiting to see if there was no tomorrow so it didn't have to keep trying.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu....0C&id=3531 [cpubenchmark.net]
https://www.cpubenchmar
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!