Slickdeals is community-supported.ย  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Sorry, this deal has expired. Get notified of deals like this in the future. Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage

Sony FE 35mm F1.8 Large-Aperture Wide-Angle Prime Lens Expired

$400
$748.00
+ Free Shipping
+31 Deal Score
14,247 Views
Amazon Global Store UK via Amazon has Sony FE 35mm F1.8 Large-Aperture Wide-Angle Prime Lens (SEL35F18F) for $399.83. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member goodweather407 for finding this deal.

About this item:
  • High resolution and large aperture full-frame performance in a compact and lightweight lens
  • Standard prime lens with fast F1. 8 aperture
  • Quiet, reliable AF tracking for excellent movies as well as stills
  • 9-Blade Circular aperture for beautiful, smooth bokeh
  • Ismart optical construction including an aspherical element for high corner-to-corner resolution

Editor's Notes & Price Research

Written by
  • About this deal:
    • Refer to the forum thread for additional information about this offer.
  • Reviews:
    • 4.7 out of 5 stars by 792 Amazon customers.
  • About this store:
Good Deal?

Original Post

Written by
Edited December 15, 2022 at 07:43 PM by
It is my first SD post
I think this is the lowest price I seen on this lens
$399 sold by Amazon UK

You may not have same warranty as an US copy but what is the chance for claiming warranty for a prime lenes

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V8X4KGG
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+31
14,247 Views
$400
$748.00
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more. If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available. You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if itโ€™s the right card for you.

Your comment cannot be blank.

Featured Comments

In my opinion and the opinion of many reviewers, this is arguably Sony's best value lens. Full frame, great aperture for low light, compact & portable, great image quality, and solid metal body with function button.

It's the only lens I've never replaced or tried to upgrade in my years owning Sony full frame cameras. To do better, you need to pay more and deal with bigger lenses, which I'd personally use less due to the size hinderance and less discreet profile.

Many Sony lenses are premium pricing, so they thankfully have the best third party Lens support with companies like Sigma and Tamron offering stronger value per dollar mostly. But this lens is fully worth the price from Sony if it's a focal length you're interested in.
So I have both lenses and each serves a different purpose. I'll start off by saying that I purchased my 35mm f/1.8 back in 8/2020 for around $600+ tax, totaling somewhere around $674. I needed it to take photographs for an event, so wasn't lucky enough to catch it on sale.

If you're going to be photographing in low light situations or just want to blur out the background with the bokeh blur, the 35mm f/1.8 is probably your best bet. On top of that it also has a minimum focusing distance of 0.22m vs the 40mm f/2.5 at 0.25m. So you can get even closer and focus on your subject(s) than the 40mm. For weddings, I sometimes use the 35mm as a macro lens to get detailed ring shots lol.

Now here's where things get interesting. I'd consider the 40mm f/2.5G lens as an environmental portrait lens because the f/2.5 aperture doesn't necessarily "blur the background" compared to the 35 f/1.8. It does a decent job, but if you're taking portraits, you're still going to see the background a bit more. Also, since it's f/2.5, it doesn't work well in very dimly lit situations (I'm talking about things like wedding receptions here, but for most people it wouldn't matter). For most people, f/2.5 is fine for most situations especially if you're photographing in well lit situations.

The cool thing about the 40mm lens is that it's smaller, thus giving it ultra portability as it weighs only 173grams versus the 35mm at 280grams. Moreover, if you plan on doing anything like taking video, you might really benefit from the manual aperture ring dial as well as the Autofocus/Manual focus override switch that's built into the lens. The 40mm is a pretty versatile lens to keep in your camera bag if you're doing video & photo. You coullllldddd try to use the 40mm as a vlogging lens and pointing it at yourself, but the 40mm focal range isn't really meant for that and your head/body might take up much of the frame when recording selfie/vlog stuff.

Both lenses are sharp and create awesome photo/video content. Personally, I already thought that the 35mm f/1.8 was a compact lens when I purchased it, so the size/weight different between the two don't really matter to me. Sure, the 40mm is actually smaller and lighter, but it isn't a significant difference.

As far as speed/aperture goes, I really think the the f/1.8 aperture makes a big difference if you're trying to create separation between your subject and the background. & then the f/1.8 aperture really does help in dimly lit situations (I'm an event and portrait photographer so there isn't always the best of light available and the f/1.8 aperture helps a lot).

As far as focal range goes, I've photographed enough content to know that I like photographing content wider at 35mm than 40mm. However, that's just personal preference. I know others that like photographing at 24mm, 40mm, 50mm, etc.

But here's the kicker with the price of this 35mm in the listing: It's sold from a UK Seller, meaning that the lens is considered "Grey Market." As a grey market lens, if anything ever happens to it and you need to get it repaired, Sony USA will deny any service to your lens.

Seeing how this is quite an investment, I'd recommend just waiting to see if there are any deals on US lenses in the days to come especially since it's the holiday season. Besides Amazon, some other great photo retailers are Adorama.com, B&H.com, Samy's Camera (Samys.com), & urlhasbeenblocked.com

Hope this helps!

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Oct 2014
L1: Learner
> bubble2 1,159 Posts
374 Reputation
cannono
12-14-2022 at 08:43 AM.
12-14-2022 at 08:43 AM.
In my opinion and the opinion of many reviewers, this is arguably Sony's best value lens. Full frame, great aperture for low light, compact & portable, great image quality, and solid metal body with function button.

It's the only lens I've never replaced or tried to upgrade in my years owning Sony full frame cameras. To do better, you need to pay more and deal with bigger lenses, which I'd personally use less due to the size hinderance and less discreet profile.

Many Sony lenses are premium pricing, so they thankfully have the best third party Lens support with companies like Sigma and Tamron offering stronger value per dollar mostly. But this lens is fully worth the price from Sony if it's a focal length you're interested in.
12
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 10,728 Posts
3,147 Reputation
MozartA
12-14-2022 at 08:55 AM.
12-14-2022 at 08:55 AM.
Quote from goodweather407 :

$399 sold by Amazon UK

You may not have same warranty as an US copy but what is the chance for claiming warranty for a prime lenes

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07V8X4KGG

So we are pretty much buying gray market stuff from UK(?)
So beside no warranty, is there any differences between UK and US version of the lens?

And what's the return policy? If the package is damage, how the return is handled?
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2009
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,047 Posts
257 Reputation
signetv
12-14-2022 at 09:30 AM.
12-14-2022 at 09:30 AM.
great price for this lens. can't argue with that
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Oct 2007
L3: Novice
> bubble2 185 Posts
14 Reputation
hommer
12-14-2022 at 09:22 PM.
12-14-2022 at 09:22 PM.
How is this lens compared with the ultra compact Sony 40mm f2.5? I'm torn between the 2. This is a great price for this 35mm. It's normally around $750. I thought it was a different model at $400.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined May 2016
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 742 Posts
231 Reputation
Pro
kousoku
12-14-2022 at 10:41 PM.
12-14-2022 at 10:41 PM.
Quote from MozartA :
So we are pretty much buying gray market stuff from UK(?)
So beside no warranty, is there any differences between UK and US version of the lens?

And what's the return policy? If the package is damage, how the return is handled?
Yah that's a big gamble for me at least in my experience Amazon Packages from the UK have not been packaged very well, if you think Amazon US does a shotty job UK is worse.
They use like the thinnest possible cardboard smallest box and no padding.

Half of is is probably the long distance in transit and exchanges hands through multiple carriers is to blame as well. No clue how gingerly the Royal Postmen handles packages there in the UK, if they can get away with such poorly packaged items like that.

I tried returning a damaged packaged from Amazon Japan once, it was too much hassle so just kept it, I suspect from the UK will be similar.

Great price but not having warranty and basically have to go through a ton of hassles not to mention expensive shipping not a deal I'd consider myself.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2009
Miraflor
> bubble2 365 Posts
155 Reputation
premiumxc
12-15-2022 at 06:38 AM.

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank premiumxc

12-15-2022 at 06:38 AM.
Quote from hommer :
How is this lens compared with the ultra compact Sony 40mm f2.5? I'm torn between the 2. This is a great price for this 35mm. It's normally around $750. I thought it was a different model at $400.
So I have both lenses and each serves a different purpose. I'll start off by saying that I purchased my 35mm f/1.8 back in 8/2020 for around $600+ tax, totaling somewhere around $674. I needed it to take photographs for an event, so wasn't lucky enough to catch it on sale.

If you're going to be photographing in low light situations or just want to blur out the background with the bokeh blur, the 35mm f/1.8 is probably your best bet. On top of that it also has a minimum focusing distance of 0.22m vs the 40mm f/2.5 at 0.25m. So you can get even closer and focus on your subject(s) than the 40mm. For weddings, I sometimes use the 35mm as a macro lens to get detailed ring shots lol.

Now here's where things get interesting. I'd consider the 40mm f/2.5G lens as an environmental portrait lens because the f/2.5 aperture doesn't necessarily "blur the background" compared to the 35 f/1.8. It does a decent job, but if you're taking portraits, you're still going to see the background a bit more. Also, since it's f/2.5, it doesn't work well in very dimly lit situations (I'm talking about things like wedding receptions here, but for most people it wouldn't matter). For most people, f/2.5 is fine for most situations especially if you're photographing in well lit situations.

The cool thing about the 40mm lens is that it's smaller, thus giving it ultra portability as it weighs only 173grams versus the 35mm at 280grams. Moreover, if you plan on doing anything like taking video, you might really benefit from the manual aperture ring dial as well as the Autofocus/Manual focus override switch that's built into the lens. The 40mm is a pretty versatile lens to keep in your camera bag if you're doing video & photo. You coullllldddd try to use the 40mm as a vlogging lens and pointing it at yourself, but the 40mm focal range isn't really meant for that and your head/body might take up much of the frame when recording selfie/vlog stuff.

Both lenses are sharp and create awesome photo/video content. Personally, I already thought that the 35mm f/1.8 was a compact lens when I purchased it, so the size/weight different between the two don't really matter to me. Sure, the 40mm is actually smaller and lighter, but it isn't a significant difference.

As far as speed/aperture goes, I really think the the f/1.8 aperture makes a big difference if you're trying to create separation between your subject and the background. & then the f/1.8 aperture really does help in dimly lit situations (I'm an event and portrait photographer so there isn't always the best of light available and the f/1.8 aperture helps a lot).

As far as focal range goes, I've photographed enough content to know that I like photographing content wider at 35mm than 40mm. However, that's just personal preference. I know others that like photographing at 24mm, 40mm, 50mm, etc.

But here's the kicker with the price of this 35mm in the listing: It's sold from a UK Seller, meaning that the lens is considered "Grey Market." As a grey market lens, if anything ever happens to it and you need to get it repaired, Sony USA will deny any service to your lens.

Seeing how this is quite an investment, I'd recommend just waiting to see if there are any deals on US lenses in the days to come especially since it's the holiday season. Besides Amazon, some other great photo retailers are Adorama.com, B&H.com, Samy's Camera (Samys.com), & urlhasbeenblocked.com

Hope this helps!
11
>
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 10,728 Posts
3,147 Reputation
MozartA
12-15-2022 at 09:18 AM.
12-15-2022 at 09:18 AM.
Would 35mm Lens able to cover almost the whole football field (like from one side of 10 yard line to the other side of 10 yard line) when taking video from the top of a High School football stand with full frame camera like A7c/a7iii. High school stand like this in the attached picture?
Or what's the max focus length able to do that? 24mm? 28mm?
And for f/1.8, when taking video, would you be able to keep everything in the middle of football field (group of players within 20~30 yards) in focus from top of the stand in late afternoon game with stadium light? Or need something smaller like f/2.8, f/3.5, etc?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Aug 2011
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 35 Posts
14 Reputation
golalakers
12-15-2022 at 09:30 AM.
12-15-2022 at 09:30 AM.
The lens here is from the Sony store, and I purchased a Zoom lens for my A6000 from the Amazon UK store in the summer and that package arrived via DHL. The lens was well packed and brand new, and I had the lens in under 5 days. The lens actually came from Spain. I saved over $400 and it worked great for my trip to Yellowstone. If any one is on the fence from ordering from the UK store I just wanted to add some feedback.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2022
New User
> bubble2 1 Posts
10 Reputation
FancyHaddock1619
12-15-2022 at 11:24 AM.
12-15-2022 at 11:24 AM.
Quote from kousoku :
Yah that's a big gamble for me at least in my experience Amazon Packages from the UK have not been packaged very well, if you think Amazon US does a shotty job UK is worse.
They use like the thinnest possible cardboard smallest box and no padding.

Half of is is probably the long distance in transit and exchanges hands through multiple carriers is to blame as well. No clue how gingerly the Royal Postmen handles packages there in the UK, if they can get away with such poorly packaged items like that.

I tried returning a damaged packaged from Amazon Japan once, it was too much hassle so just kept it, I suspect from the UK will be similar.

Great price but not having warranty and basically have to go through a ton of hassles not to mention expensive shipping not a deal I'd consider myself.
I personally purchased this lens from Amazon.com with amazon UK as seller and have no issue with it. The package was delivered by DHL, brand new, sealed. I think SONY lenses are universal regardless where you purchased it besides the warranty coverage. I am not sure if your prior experience is from Amazon.com (with Amazon jp as seller) or Amazon.co.jp. As long as your purchased on Amazon.com, it would be covered by the same return policy as any other purchase. I have confirmed with Amazon, it could be returned for a full refund, seller(amazon UK) will cover the return shipping up to $20. I hope this would answer your concern. Thanks
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jun 2007
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,468 Posts
191 Reputation
89turboii
12-15-2022 at 12:27 PM.
12-15-2022 at 12:27 PM.
Quote from kousoku :
Yah that's a big gamble for me at least in my experience Amazon Packages from the UK have not been packaged very well, if you think Amazon US does a shotty job UK is worse.
They use like the thinnest possible cardboard smallest box and no padding.

Half of is is probably the long distance in transit and exchanges hands through multiple carriers is to blame as well. No clue how gingerly the Royal Postmen handles packages there in the UK, if they can get away with such poorly packaged items like that.

I tried returning a damaged packaged from Amazon Japan once, it was too much hassle so just kept it, I suspect from the UK will be similar.

Great price but not having warranty and basically have to go through a ton of hassles not to mention expensive shipping not a deal I'd consider myself.
What if the lens is decentered? I recently rolled the dice on a 200600 from Amazon uk and they want me to pay renturn shipping although the lens cannot grab a sharp image, they once received will pay $20 of the total shipping is what it says on the return information.

The workaround for import tarrifs does not align perhaps with this type of product.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2007
L1: Learner
> bubble2 17 Posts
10 Reputation
infobhan
12-15-2022 at 02:58 PM.
12-15-2022 at 02:58 PM.
I debated about getting this, but ultimately didn't think the risk was worth it (dealing with UK shipping, grey market issues, etc.). The Samyang 35 1.8 has been highly reviewed and is quite competitive and is now on sale at Samyangus.com. Even adding in the lens station needed to update Samyang lens firmware, I got the whole package for ~$300.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Oct 2007
L3: Novice
> bubble2 185 Posts
14 Reputation
hommer
12-15-2022 at 06:23 PM.
12-15-2022 at 06:23 PM.
Quote from premiumxc :
So I have both lenses and each serves a different purpose. I'll start off by saying that I purchased my 35mm f/1.8 back in 8/2020 for around $600+ tax, totaling somewhere around $674. I needed it to take photographs for an event, so wasn't lucky enough to catch it on sale.

The shipping for this 35mm from the Uk is too long for me to get it before my trip

If you're going to be photographing in low light situations or just want to blur out the background with the bokeh blur, the 35mm f/1.8 is probably your best bet. On top of that it also has a minimum focusing distance of 0.22m vs the 40mm f/2.5 at 0.25m. So you can get even closer and focus on your subject(s) than the 40mm. For weddings, I sometimes use the 35mm as a macro lens to get detailed ring shots lol.

Now here's where things get interesting. I'd consider the 40mm f/2.5G lens as an environmental portrait lens because the f/2.5 aperture doesn't necessarily "blur the background" compared to the 35 f/1.8. It does a decent job, but if you're taking portraits, you're still going to see the background a bit more. Also, since it's f/2.5, it doesn't work well in very dimly lit situations (I'm talking about things like wedding receptions here, but for most people it wouldn't matter). For most people, f/2.5 is fine for most situations especially if you're photographing in well lit situations.

The cool thing about the 40mm lens is that it's smaller, thus giving it ultra portability as it weighs only 173grams versus the 35mm at 280grams. Moreover, if you plan on doing anything like taking video, you might really benefit from the manual aperture ring dial as well as the Autofocus/Manual focus override switch that's built into the lens. The 40mm is a pretty versatile lens to keep in your camera bag if you're doing video & photo. You coullllldddd try to use the 40mm as a vlogging lens and pointing it at yourself, but the 40mm focal range isn't really meant for that and your head/body might take up much of the frame when recording selfie/vlog stuff.

Both lenses are sharp and create awesome photo/video content. Personally, I already thought that the 35mm f/1.8 was a compact lens when I purchased it, so the size/weight different between the two don't really matter to me. Sure, the 40mm is actually smaller and lighter, but it isn't a significant difference.

As far as speed/aperture goes, I really think the the f/1.8 aperture makes a big difference if you're trying to create separation between your subject and the background. & then the f/1.8 aperture really does help in dimly lit situations (I'm an event and portrait photographer so there isn't always the best of light available and the f/1.8 aperture helps a lot).

As far as focal range goes, I've photographed enough content to know that I like photographing content wider at 35mm than 40mm. However, that's just personal preference. I know others that like photographing at 24mm, 40mm, 50mm, etc.

But here's the kicker with the price of this 35mm in the listing: It's sold from a UK Seller, meaning that the lens is considered "Grey Market." As a grey market lens, if anything ever happens to it and you need to get it repaired, Sony USA will deny any service to your lens.

Seeing how this is quite an investment, I'd recommend just waiting to see if there are any deals on US lenses in the days to come especially since it's the holiday season. Besides Amazon, some other great photo retailers are Adorama.com, B&H.com, Samy's Camera (Samys.com), & urlhasbeenblocked.com

Hope this helps!
Thank you, super useful comment. I thought so too the 1.8 will have better bokeh. I can get a used 40mm at $400 locally. I plan to use the lens with my A7C for a compact and light weight for the upcoming Japan trip where l I'll be walking around a lot so want a very light weight kit. Do you think the 40mm is still a good lens for my use case?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jan 2009
Miraflor
> bubble2 365 Posts
155 Reputation
premiumxc
12-15-2022 at 06:28 PM.
12-15-2022 at 06:28 PM.
Quote from hommer :
Thank you, super useful comment. I thought so too the 1.8 will have better bokeh. I can get a used 40mm at $400 locally. I plan to use the lens with my A7C for a compact and light weight for the upcoming Japan trip where l I'll be walking around a lot so want a very light weight kit. Do you think the 40mm is still a good lens for my use case?
Hi, glad I could help. Hmm, if you were trying to take pictures of landscapes, adventuring around the city, taking portraits, you might want to consider a 24mm or 35mm lens because you'd have a wider field of view. I'm thinking the 40mm field of view might be too tight, and you won't always have the ability to "take a few steps back" to get the shot.

I'd say try renting out the 35mm or 40mm lens to see what you prefer. Take the lenses out for a test drive before making a big purchase. A popular app for renting gear for the cheap is called ShareGrid. Check it out and see what's available in your area for a quick and easy rental.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Page 1 of 3
Start the Conversation
 

More Amazon Deals

More Sony Deals

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.