Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Sorry, this deal has expired. Get notified of deals like this in the future. Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage

2-Pack Milwaukee M12 RedLithium XC 3Ah Battery Expired

$69
$129.00
+ $6.50 S&H
+26 Deal Score
18,245 Views
ACME Tools has 2-Pack Milwaukee M12 RedLithium XC 3Ah Battery (48-11-2412) for $69 after applying promo code TCC10 at checkout. Shipping is $6.49.

Thanks to Community Member MasterGamer100 for finding this deal.

Features:
  • 3.0 Amp hour - 32 watt hour battery
  • High current discharge - increased power and performance
  • Sturdy base - allows M12 tools to easily stand
  • Lithium-ion battery delivers long life and run time with fade-free power
  • For use with Milwaukee M12 cordless tools

Editor's Notes & Price Research

Written by
  • About this deal:
    • This price including shipping is $53.51 lower (41.4% savings) than the list price of $129.
  • About this product:
  • About this store:
    • Details of Acme Tool's return policy here.

Original Post

Written by
Edited January 16, 2023 at 11:55 AM by
Lowest price I've seen for the M12 xc 3.0 2 pack of batteries

$69 (Nice!) with code TCC10

https://www.acmetools.com/m12-red...86799.html
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+26
18,245 Views
$69
$129.00

Your comment cannot be blank.

Featured Comments

The difference between the XC 3.0Ah and the regular (compact) 3.0Ah M12 batteries is the number of cells. Inside these packs are lithium ion cells rated at ~4V each. The compact has 3 of them, and the XC has 6. By using twice as many cells (two sets of three in parallel) you are dividing the load between them and you get some benefits:

less heat generated
more power output
cells last longer (lifetime, not per charge)

However, since the compact battery has only 3 cells and is also 3Ah, that means the cells are better rated individually. Take from that what you will -- I don't know the what impact higher rated cells have in battery longevity or power output, but it is something to consider.

In my opinion, if you can handle the bulkier pack, you are better off getting the XCs.
If you feel like what I said ('my opinion') was ill-informed, I invite you to tell me what was wrong about it so that I don't make the same mistake again. 'Ah' is a rating for current over time, and is just one spec of a battery, and just like anything technical, the more you learn about it, the more you realize how not-simple it is.
I understand that you have a different perspective and value weight and compactness over detailed specifications, but I do not understand why this warranted you insulting me over it?

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined May 2007
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,259 Posts
347 Reputation
ncsgsydn
01-16-2023 at 08:14 AM.
01-16-2023 at 08:14 AM.
How much is shipping?
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2010
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 90 Posts
16 Reputation
diablokicks
01-16-2023 at 08:26 AM.
01-16-2023 at 08:26 AM.
Quote from leemaverickly :
how much is shipping?

$6.50
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Feb 2021
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 457 Posts
205 Reputation
HappyAccident
01-16-2023 at 08:43 AM.

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank HappyAccident

01-16-2023 at 08:43 AM.
The difference between the XC 3.0Ah and the regular (compact) 3.0Ah M12 batteries is the number of cells. Inside these packs are lithium ion cells rated at ~4V each. The compact has 3 of them, and the XC has 6. By using twice as many cells (two sets of three in parallel) you are dividing the load between them and you get some benefits:
  • less heat generated
  • more power output
  • cells last longer (lifetime, not per charge)
However, since the compact battery has only 3 cells and is also 3Ah, that means the cells are better rated individually. Take from that what you will -- I don't know the what impact higher rated cells have in battery longevity or power output, but it is something to consider.

In my opinion, if you can handle the bulkier pack, you are better off getting the XCs.
20
>
4
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 7,252 Posts
884 Reputation
KMan
01-16-2023 at 08:55 AM.
01-16-2023 at 08:55 AM.
Quote from HappyAccident :
The difference between the XC 3.0Ah and the regular (compact) 3.0Ah M12 batteries is the number of cells. Inside these packs are lithium ion cells rated at ~4V each. The compact has 3 of them, and the XC has 6. By using twice as many cells (two sets of three in parallel) you are dividing the load between them and you get some benefits:
  • less heat generated
  • more power output
  • cells last longer (lifetime, not per charge)
However, since the compact battery has only 3 cells and is also 3Ah, that means the cells are better rated individually. Take from that what you will -- I don't know the what impact higher rated cells have in battery longevity or power output, but it is something to consider.

In my opinion, if you can handle the bulkier pack, you are better off getting the XCs.
Thanks, very helpful, but I'm still a bit confused as to how the CP 3.0Ah M12 battery can be different from XC 3.0Ah M12 battery. What does "better rated" cells mean, exactly? More boost or sustained power output, more linear sustained output, longer output, longer life, etc.? I thought that 3.0 Ah is 3.0Ah.

I can use another M12 battery or two as I have 6 M12 tools but only 5 M12 batteries, and have all the different kinds except this one and the new 2.5 & 5.0 ones.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jul 2019
L1: Learner
> bubble2 21 Posts
14 Reputation
PurpleMitten6516
01-16-2023 at 09:02 AM.
01-16-2023 at 09:02 AM.
I know the bandfile isn't released yet, but maybe some of you have early access to one and can comment on if these batteries would be good for that tool. I'm currently M18 only, but the bandfile is going to be my first M12 tool and I will need some batteries for it, but not sure if 3AH would be sufficient or if I should wait for a higher capacity battery deal.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jun 2018
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 55 Posts
18 Reputation
JonP7715
01-16-2023 at 09:18 AM.
01-16-2023 at 09:18 AM.
Quote from KMan :
Thanks, very helpful, but I'm still a bit confused as to how the CP 3.0Ah M12 battery can be different from XC 3.0Ah M12 battery. What does "better rated" cells mean, exactly? More boost or sustained power output, more linear sustained output, longer output, longer life, etc.? I thought that 3.0 Ah is 3.0Ah.

I can use another M12 battery or two as I have 6 M12 tools but only 5 M12 batteries, and have all the different kinds except this one and the new 2.5 & 5.0 ones.
Better rated would imply less voltage sag and heat loss at higher amp draws (burst or sustained or both).

It's a tradeoff with cost and capacity.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2004
..to infinity and beyond
> bubble2 180 Posts
58 Reputation
krisma
01-16-2023 at 09:29 AM.
01-16-2023 at 09:29 AM.
FYI, TCC10 code also seems to work on other milwaukee products that I checked.
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Sep 2017
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 58 Posts
14 Reputation
Golem20
01-16-2023 at 09:40 AM.
01-16-2023 at 09:40 AM.
Quote from PurpleMitten6516 :
I know the bandfile isn't released yet, but maybe some of you have early access to one and can comment on if these batteries would be good for that tool. I'm currently M18 only, but the bandfile is going to be my first M12 tool and I will need some batteries for it, but not sure if 3AH would be sufficient or if I should wait for a higher capacity battery deal.
i made bandfile from milwaukee m12 cut off tool using ebay kit.

ryobi is owned by same company that owns milwaukee. they have had bandfile for a few years. it is odd that milwaukee is so far behind.
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 7,252 Posts
884 Reputation
KMan
01-16-2023 at 09:41 AM.
01-16-2023 at 09:41 AM.
Quote from JonP7715 :
Better rated would imply less voltage sag and heat loss at higher amp draws (burst or sustained or both).

It's a tradeoff with cost and capacity.
Thanks. This deal is tempting but I might wait until HD runs another of their M12 tool + charger + 2 + 4Ah battery deals for $129 or so. I already have 3 chargers but $60 more for an inflator or basic blower might be worth it for me. And yes, I realize that while 2 + 4 = 2 x 3, 2 of the XC3's are probably a smarter choice than a CP2 & XC4.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jul 2019
L1: Learner
> bubble2 21 Posts
14 Reputation
PurpleMitten6516
01-16-2023 at 09:42 AM.
01-16-2023 at 09:42 AM.
Quote from Golem20 :
i made bandfile from milwaukee m12 cut off tool using ebay kit.

ryobi is owned by same company that owns milwaukee. they have had bandfile for a few years. it is odd that milwaukee is so far behind.

I know it's a different tool, but maybe similar in the end. What size battery do you run? Have you tried a 3AH and if so does it seem to perform pretty good?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Feb 2021
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 457 Posts
205 Reputation
HappyAccident
01-16-2023 at 09:47 AM.
01-16-2023 at 09:47 AM.
Quote from KMan :
Thanks, very helpful, but I'm still a bit confused as to how the CP 3.0Ah M12 battery can be different from XC 3.0Ah M12 battery. What does "better rated" cells mean, exactly? More boost or sustained power output, more linear sustained output, longer output, longer life, etc.? I thought that 3.0 Ah is 3.0Ah.

I can use another M12 battery or two as I have 6 M12 tools but only 5 M12 batteries, and have all the different kinds except this one and the new 2.5 & 5.0 ones.
By better rated I meant the cells are rated for more Ah. If they are both 3Ah and the XC has twice as many cells, then the cells in the compact would be twice as many Ah. Cells in parallel add Ah but do not add voltage, sells in series do not add Ah but add voltage..

Illustrated:

XC 3.0Ah M12 Each Cell rated [email protected]

Code:
POS  (OUT)   NEG
+               | 
|C1|-+|C3|-+|C5|-
+               | 
|C2|-+|C4|-+|C6|-
CP 3.0Ah M12 Each Cell rated 4V@3Ah

Code:
POS  (OUT)   NEG
+               | 
|C1|-+|C2|-+|C3|-
3
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by HappyAccident January 16, 2023 at 09:51 AM.
Joined Sep 2011
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 88 Posts
34 Reputation
bweech
01-16-2023 at 10:04 AM.
01-16-2023 at 10:04 AM.
Quote from krisma :
FYI, TCC10 code also seems to work on other milwaukee products that I checked.

Which ones? Didn't work for anything I tried.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 7,252 Posts
884 Reputation
KMan
01-16-2023 at 10:15 AM.
01-16-2023 at 10:15 AM.
Quote from HappyAccident :
By better rated I meant the cells are rated for more Ah. If they are both 3Ah and the XC has twice as many cells, then the cells in the compact would be twice as many Ah. Cells in parallel add Ah but do not add voltage, sells in series do not add Ah but add voltage..

Illustrated:

XC 3.0Ah M12 Each Cell rated [email protected]

Code:
POS  (OUT)   NEG
+               | 
|C1|-+|C3|-+|C5|-
+               | 
|C2|-+|C4|-+|C6|-
CP 3.0Ah M12 Each Cell rated 4V@3Ah

Code:
POS  (OUT)   NEG
+               | 
|C1|-+|C2|-+|C3|-
Yeah I understand S v P v S+P, but if the CP's cells have twice as much capacity as the XC's cells, then why do they claim that the XC has extended capacity, which is what XC stands for? More likely they have more capacity per cell but not quite double? But then how does their math add up? Again, 3.0 is 3.0.

Not arguing with you, rather with Milwaukee's marketing team.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Page 1 of 3
Start the Conversation
 
Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.