Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
frontpagemyk.mayk posted Jan 16, 2023 07:43 PM
frontpagemyk.mayk posted Jan 16, 2023 07:43 PM

64GB Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Metro by T-Mobile)

+ Free Shipping

$40

$279

85% off
Metro by T-Mobile
704 Comments 182,450 Views
Get Deal at Retailer
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Update: this popular offer is available again

Metro by T-Mobile has 64GB Samsung Galaxy A14 5G on sale for $40 when you follow the instructions below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member myk.mayk for finding this deal.

Deal Instructions:
  1. Go to 64GB Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
  2. Click "Need a new number"
  3. Add item to cart
  4. Select "$40/mo. Prepaid Unlimited Plan"
  5. Proceed to cart
  6. Complete checkout
  7. Your price will be $40

Editor's Notes

Written by slickdewmaster | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Metro by T-Mobile phone unlock policy here
  • About this store:
    • Metro by T-Mobile return policy here
  • See forum thread for additional deal discussion

Original Post

Written by myk.mayk
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Update: this popular offer is available again

Metro by T-Mobile has 64GB Samsung Galaxy A14 5G on sale for $40 when you follow the instructions below. Shipping is free.

Thanks to community member myk.mayk for finding this deal.

Deal Instructions:
  1. Go to 64GB Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
  2. Click "Need a new number"
  3. Add item to cart
  4. Select "$40/mo. Prepaid Unlimited Plan"
  5. Proceed to cart
  6. Complete checkout
  7. Your price will be $40

Editor's Notes

Written by slickdewmaster | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • Metro by T-Mobile phone unlock policy here
  • About this store:
    • Metro by T-Mobile return policy here
  • See forum thread for additional deal discussion

Original Post

Written by myk.mayk

Community Voting

Deal Score
+137
Good Deal
Get Deal at Retailer

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

skyline31518
138 Posts
42 Reputation
No, I just tried, it doesn't work...
ProtonDestron
298 Posts
217 Reputation
For newer Samsung phones with 4GB+64GB or less including A13, A14, A23, etc., if it lags and freezes during normal usage, update to Android 13 (One UI 5) and go to Settings - Device care - Memory - RAM Plus and turn it off completely.

My Galaxy A23 becomes much more responsive after T-Mobile pushed Android 13 and allowed me to do the above.
UniqueAction5216
386 Posts
127 Reputation
Wireless charging is not a midrange phone feature, let alone a budget line like this. Pixel 6A doesn't have it either.

705 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 18, 2023 09:58 PM
708 Posts
Joined Oct 2022
HappyDome8591Jan 18, 2023 09:58 PM
708 Posts
Quote from cdog999 :
Thanks, in for two. My pixel 3 is starting to act a little flaky. Hope I can hold out the 6 months. And hope its not odd going down on this one (pixel flagship vs samsung mid tier)
This one is not a mid tier, it is an entry level phone. Which is why it is free (+$40 plan). Samsung's mid tier is the A53, which is available for $99 (+$40 plan; $50 +$40 plan if you are porting your number).

You will probably be disappointed in the potato camera on this one. I'm not happy even with the A53 camera compared to the Pixels.
1
Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jan 18, 2023 10:16 PM
19,240 Posts
Joined Sep 2011
bluekiwi
Expert
This user is an Expert in Tech & Electronics
Jan 18, 2023 10:16 PM
19,240 Posts
Quote from AquaHamster797 :
Why was the deal closed?
It was OOS online and not available at most stores but back in stock online now, just placed another order
Jan 18, 2023 10:40 PM
3,064 Posts
Joined Feb 2005
redRangerJan 18, 2023 10:40 PM
3,064 Posts
Quote from whyzir :
Thanks OP, I ordered one last night, got the confirmation email, but havent received the shipping notification email yet.
Quote from DealDunDunaDun01 :
Same here..is anyone else facing the same problem? No shipping information provided yet
It can take a day or two to ship...check spam folder also...
Jan 19, 2023 01:17 AM
3,432 Posts
Joined May 2004
Deal HoundJan 19, 2023 01:17 AM
3,432 Posts
Quote from ieee488 :
Because wireless charging is more wasteful for the consumer.
https://www.androidcentral.com/wi...%20charger.
Unless you charge your phone with a hand-crank generator, worrying about the lower efficiency of wireless phone charging is patently silly. With all due respect, you should know that as someone with an IEEE standard for a username.

An iPhone 14 Pro Max has a battery capacity of 16.68 Wh [9to5mac.com]. If you fully charged the battery twice a day for a year, it would consume a paltry 12 kWh of energy before accounting for charging efficiency. At the average U.S. price per kW of 17 cents [bls.gov], that's a cost of $2. That's $2 for an entire year of charging before considering charging efficiency!

That article you linked to claims wireless charging is 70% as efficient as wired charging. Even if wireless charging were only 50% efficient overall, you'd only be wasting $2 annually to inefficiency. That kind of inefficiency would be a significant waste if we were talking about charging an electric vehicle that might consume $1,000 of electricity annually, but we're not.

I don't know about you, but an extra $2 a year in energy consumption is well worth the convenience of wireless charging to me.

Jan 19, 2023 01:52 AM
3,240 Posts
Joined Jun 2004
ieee488Jan 19, 2023 01:52 AM
3,240 Posts
Quote from Deal Hound :
Unless you charge your phone with a hand-crank generator, worrying about the lower efficiency of wireless phone charging is patently silly. With all due respect, you should know that as someone with an IEEE standard for a username.

An iPhone 14 Pro Max has a battery capacity of 16.68 Wh [9to5mac.com]. If you fully charged the battery twice a day for a year, it would consume a paltry 12 kWh of energy before accounting for charging efficiency. At the average U.S. price per kW of 17 cents [bls.gov], that's a cost of $2. That's $2 for an entire year of charging before considering charging efficiency!

That article you linked to claims wireless charging is 70% as efficient as wired charging. Even if wireless charging were only 50% efficient overall, you'd only be wasting $2 annually to inefficiency. That kind of inefficiency would be a significant waste if we were talking about charging an electric vehicle that might consume $1,000 of electricity annually, but we're not.

I don't know about you, but an extra $2 a year in energy consumption is well worth the convenience of wireless charging to me.
Who said I was worrying?
I merely suggested a reason.

The actual reason is more likely that the components required for wireless charging costs more. Isn't it always about the cost? Cost which equates to price.

16.68 Wh x 2/day x 365 days = 12176.4 Wh = 1.21764 kWh
1.21764 kWh x 2 (because of 50% inefficieny) x $0.165 / kWh = $4.018


Jan 19, 2023 01:59 AM
5,411 Posts
Joined Mar 2011
Supply_and_DemandJan 19, 2023 01:59 AM
5,411 Posts
Quote from HappyDome8591 :
This one is not a mid tier, it is an entry level phone. Which is why it is free (+$40 plan). Samsung's mid tier is the A53, which is available for $99 (+$40 plan; $50 +$40 plan if you are porting your number).

You will probably be disappointed in the potato camera on this one. I'm not happy even with the A53 camera compared to the Pixels.
For Samsung it's maybe closer to entry level but overall as an android I'd call it lower mid range. Specs are decent, all that's really missing is another 2gb of ram. 1080p with NFC, 5G, 90hz, 50mp cam and 5000mah paired with an ok chipset.
Jan 19, 2023 02:05 AM
28 Posts
Joined Nov 2021
DealDunDunaDun01Jan 19, 2023 02:05 AM
28 Posts
Quote from redRanger :
It can take a day or two to ship...check spam folder also...
Thanks. Spoke with CS and they were quick to ship it. Expected to arrive tomorrow.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 19, 2023 02:19 AM
1,940 Posts
Joined Nov 2010
speed_demonJan 19, 2023 02:19 AM
1,940 Posts
Can you sign up more than once? I have three people in my household. Wasn't sure if having the sme address would be a problem.
Jan 19, 2023 02:28 AM
81 Posts
Joined Nov 2015
yubeieJan 19, 2023 02:28 AM
81 Posts
Quote from speed_demon :
Can you sign up more than once? I have three people in my household. Wasn't sure if having the sme address would be a problem.
similar issue..I was able to place two orders the third one failed asking me to contact customer service..wonder if it's just a security thingy..never bothered to call them though
Jan 19, 2023 03:10 AM
3,432 Posts
Joined May 2004
Deal HoundJan 19, 2023 03:10 AM
3,432 Posts
Quote from ieee488 :
Who said I was worrying?
I merely suggested a reason.

The actual reason is more likely that the components required for wireless charging costs more. Isn't it always about the cost? Cost which equates to price.

16.68 Wh x 2/day x 365 days = 12176.4 Wh = 1.21764 kWh
1.21764 kWh x 2 (because of 50% inefficieny) x $0.165 / kWh = $4.018
Thanks for the clarification. I was afraid that article might have given you and others the impression that wireless phone charging wastes a huge amount of money or something. Thumbsup

Yes, I suspect you are right about the real reason being the cost of the components. I bet phone manufacturers are also deliberately withholding the feature from cheaper phones as a way to upsell their more expensive and profitable models, like they do with flash memory [theregister.com]. That will only work until no one is willing to buy a phone anymore without wireless charging, just like a phone without a camera would be unsalable now.

For the record, the article does end with:
Quote :
When everything is said and done, you're not really wasting a lot of energy with any phone charging method. But some are more efficient than others, and phone manufacturers are working on ways the make the more convenient methods like fast charging and wireless charging even less wasteful.
But I suspect most people didn't read to the end of the article, and even if they did, they might still be wondering just how much the waste is. It would have been nice if the author had quantified how wasteful wireless charging is in absolute terms, but I suspect he didn't because that would have made it clear the article was discussing something that's almost completely moot.
Jan 19, 2023 03:17 AM
3,240 Posts
Joined Jun 2004
ieee488Jan 19, 2023 03:17 AM
3,240 Posts
Quote from Deal Hound :
Thanks for the clarification. I was afraid that article might have given you and others the impression that wireless phone charging wastes a huge amount of money or something.

Yes, I suspect you are right about the real reason being the cost of the components. I bet phone manufacturers are also deliberately withholding the feature from cheaper phones as a way to upsell their more expensive and profitable models, like they do with flash memory [theregister.com]. That will only work until no one is willing to buy a phone anymore without wireless charging, just like a phone without a camera would be unsalable now.

For the record, the article does end with:

But I suspect most people didn't read to the end of the article, and even if they did, they might still be wondering just how much the waste is. It would have been nice if the author had quantified how wasteful wireless charging is in absolute terms, but I suspect he didn't because that would have made it clear the article was discussing something that's almost completely moot.
If wireless charging is 70% as efficient as wired charging, that means it will take 1.3x as long.
As an example if it takes 1 hour with wired charging to go 0 to 100%, then for that same hour you'd get to 70% using wireless charging. You'd need another 18 minutes to get to 100%.
That is assuming charging is linear, but I have noticed that it isn't and takes longer to go the last 10% as it does to go from 0% to 10%.
Does that extra 30% of time make a difference?


Jan 19, 2023 04:27 AM
3,432 Posts
Joined May 2004
Deal HoundJan 19, 2023 04:27 AM
3,432 Posts
Quote from ieee488 :
If wireless charging is 70% as efficient as wired charging, that means it will take 1.3x as long.
As an example if it takes 1 hour with wired charging to go 0 to 100%, then for that same hour you'd get to 70% using wireless charging. You'd need another 18 minutes to get to 100%.
That is assuming charging is linear, but I have noticed that it isn't and takes longer to go the last 10% as it does to go from 0% to 10%.
Does that extra 30% of time make a difference?
In my long-standing quest to be the most irritating and pedantic jerk I can be, I am obligated to point out that the difference in charging time is greater than you stated. It would actually take 43% longer (26 more minutes). I'll leave why as a mathematical exercise for you and the rest of the casual observers among us.

The extra time doesn't matter to me. I use less than 100% of my phone's charge per day, so it has plenty of opportunity to recharge while I'm sleeping. But I'm sure it matters to some telephone power users.

The extra time can be compensated for by increasing the input power. That would result in a little more wasted energy, but a little more of not much is still not much. The real limiting factor of charging speed is how fast the battery can be charged without something bad happening. Maybe the extra heat from the the inefficiency means the maximum rate of wireless charging will always be lower than wired charging if all else is equal, but wireless charging being too slow doesn't seem to be a common complaint.

Pro
Jan 19, 2023 06:27 AM
2,081 Posts
Joined Aug 2008
DealMayhem
Pro
Jan 19, 2023 06:27 AM
2,081 Posts
Ordered yesterday and received shipping notice with tracking # today. 2-3 days shipping, so it will be here soon.
Jan 19, 2023 07:37 AM
1,188 Posts
Joined Jul 2018
rastatechJan 19, 2023 07:37 AM
1,188 Posts
Quote from fernandoc8398 :
So I got the phone and activated. Quite happy with it. Now I just need to leave it alone for 6 months and it will unlock itself? Does it has a timer somewhere I can check for how long to unlock? Thanks!
https://calculat.io/en/date/count...anuary--18

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jan 19, 2023 07:43 AM
1,188 Posts
Joined Jul 2018
rastatechJan 19, 2023 07:43 AM
1,188 Posts
I usually connect the iPhone to the wifi without problems but I noticed with 2 Android devices today they connected to the wifi but said no Internet. Essentially, the connected to the Wifi but did not pull the correct DHCP info from the router. I needed to configure them manually with static IP. Never had that problem with other Android devices but 2 of them today. Anyone here has a hint what could cause that? WPA2/3 setting and the router Asus/Merlin does serve DHCP but a different LAN IP range from what the Android ended up with.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals