This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Why do people want zipped luggage? this is easily opened with a pen or knife.
Even ignoring the security aspect, what I've never understood/liked about zipped hard size luggage is that it's not fully hard. Sure, the sides will have (some) protection from piercing, I guess, but the overall luggage provides little to no practical crush resistance.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank dman081
Quote
from Aegann
:
Hard sides is actually lighter than the cloth counterpart
It wasn't when I looked.
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably doesn't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
Last edited by dman081 January 25, 2023 at 12:33 PM.
How does this set compare to the Samsonite OMNI 2 3-PC set that normally sells for $206? Is the latter one a better deal since you get a 25-in one for just $40 more?
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Why is hard sided better for you? It's more water resistant, maybe easier to stack, and perhaps a bit tougher to cut into?
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
I personally would not check in any hard side luggage, because it will be damaged regardless it is ABS or poly. So for large checked luggage, better to have soft-side ones.
1
4
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Jan 25, 2023 7:58 PM
378 Comments
Joined Jan 2011
This comment has been rated as unhelpful by Slickdeals users.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MaroonLumber464
Quote
from tata000
:
The larger one is so heavy, 15 lbs
Quote
from dman081
:
It wasn't when I looked.
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably don't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
It has been discussed in previous threads that the website description is wrong and that the box claims a weight of 11lbs.
This is a warehouse club, of course they only sell luggage in bundles. If you want individual pieces shop elsewhere.
If Costco is cheaper even with two pieces vs. one elsewhere, buy it and give the small one away.
If you want to abuse the costco return policy and return it after using it for years, put the extra piece into storage until then.
The same warehouse club sell certain items individually, such as pants and wiper blades. Pointing out that they are warehouse club does not fully explain why they cannot sell luggage individually.
The same warehouse club sell certain items individually, such as pants and wiper blades. Pointing out that they are warehouse club does not fully explain why they cannot sell luggage individually.
How is that a correlation? why don't they sell eggs individually then?
They work out contracts to buy in bulk from the manufacturers or distributors and that may entail selling sets. They place a premium on display spaces and will only carry so much in an area. if they can get a better deal buying the set and their marketing tests shows sets sell better then they will sell sets. If you want singles then go to TJ Maxx.
I am regretting my decision to keep the Samsonite, due to the lack of washable liners and the lack of a bottom handle on the check-in bag.
I didn't think I would mind it, nor the plastic pockets, but the Samsonite is noticeably lower quality compared to the Delsey.
If you are undecided and have both, keep the Delsey. My other luggage has washable liners and it's so much easier to unzip and wash everything after travel, to reduce any chance of bringing critters home. Just vacuuming isn't enough.
If the Delsey ever comes back in stock, I'm trading this back in.
Another:
The Delsey feels higher quality in both hardshell quality (seems thicker) and hardware fit and finish. Extending the handle is solid and smooth and the button offers positive feedback. The liner is easily washable since the pockets aren't plastic and it uses self-healing zippers (I found out when accidentally trying to add too many clothes). The major con is the carry-on size, since it exceeds airline size limits. A minor issue is that the carry-on does not have a lock.
The Samsonite has a lack of fit and finish, but they are within the airline size limits and the carry-on has a lock. The shell is super flimsy, which might be ok if it's treated gently, but Samsonite has a reputation for permanent dents. I don't consider the little hooks useful, since it doesn't have the ability to secure a bag and the interior organization is similar to the Delsey. The liner is not as easily washed, since one of the pockets is solid plastic and will need to be propped open to dry.
Last edited by MrSkeptic January 25, 2023 at 02:57 PM.
2
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I have observed that a 25 inch generally is the sweet spot in terms of size weight and capacity. 27 inches add unnecessary material weight that offsets the additional capacity they may provide if you are not planning to go beyond the weight restrictions. Plus some airlines may have issues with the overall size exceeding 30 inch (with wheels)
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
52 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank tata000
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank dman081
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Cloth 28"
13.8 lbs
2.75 ft3
5 lbs per ft3
https://www.costco.com/samsonite-...48026.html
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably doesn't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
But it's less expandable and heavier, which is a huge thing for large luggage and 50lb luggage limits. It doesn't add up for me.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MaroonLumber464
Edit: So I do see that the two Samsonite pairs that Costco offers —one hard sided the other soft — aren't the same size. The large soft-sided ones are lighter, but they measure out to more than 1cubic foot less internal space, and the weight-to-space efficiency is much better with the hard-sided. A cubic foot less is a meaningful difference, but with the ability to overpack soft sided luggage, I do wonder how much of a difference that end up being…or if you reach the 50 lb airline weight limit before that extra space matters.
Hard sided 27"
14.9 lbs
3.85 ft3 internal volume
3.87 pounds per ft3
Cloth 28"
13.8 lbs
2.75 ft3
5 lbs per ft3
https://www.costco.com/samsonite-...48026.html [costco.com]
Another edit: I've only been looking at large suitcases (that's all I need right now; I wish they would sell these separately). But you're right about the carry-on size — the hard sided is lighter than the soft sided, at 6.39 to 8.5 lbs. For most that probably don't matter since I've never seen enforcing carry-on weights limits.
The hard carry-on shows 2,340 inches of interior volume compared to 2,316 inches for the soft. But that almost certainly isn't a meaningful difference, and the soft might even allow considerably more to be packed than the hard.
https://slickdeals.net/f/16341259-samsonite-amplitude-2-piece-hardside-set-164-99-in-store-184-99-costco-com?page=4#comm
If Costco is cheaper even with two pieces vs. one elsewhere, buy it and give the small one away.
If you want to abuse the costco return policy and return it after using it for years, put the extra piece into storage until then.
They work out contracts to buy in bulk from the manufacturers or distributors and that may entail selling sets. They place a premium on display spaces and will only carry so much in an area. if they can get a better deal buying the set and their marketing tests shows sets sell better then they will sell sets. If you want singles then go to TJ Maxx.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank kellylynn
Heavier than better models.
One comment:
I am regretting my decision to keep the Samsonite, due to the lack of washable liners and the lack of a bottom handle on the check-in bag.
I didn't think I would mind it, nor the plastic pockets, but the Samsonite is noticeably lower quality compared to the Delsey.
If you are undecided and have both, keep the Delsey. My other luggage has washable liners and it's so much easier to unzip and wash everything after travel, to reduce any chance of bringing critters home. Just vacuuming isn't enough.
If the Delsey ever comes back in stock, I'm trading this back in.
Another:
The Delsey feels higher quality in both hardshell quality (seems thicker) and hardware fit and finish. Extending the handle is solid and smooth and the button offers positive feedback. The liner is easily washable since the pockets aren't plastic and it uses self-healing zippers (I found out when accidentally trying to add too many clothes). The major con is the carry-on size, since it exceeds airline size limits. A minor issue is that the carry-on does not have a lock.
The Samsonite has a lack of fit and finish, but they are within the airline size limits and the carry-on has a lock. The shell is super flimsy, which might be ok if it's treated gently, but Samsonite has a reputation for permanent dents. I don't consider the little hooks useful, since it doesn't have the ability to secure a bag and the interior organization is similar to the Delsey. The liner is not as easily washed, since one of the pockets is solid plastic and will need to be propped open to dry.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!