Forum Thread

It's back! Inland 2TB SSD NVMe PCIe Gen 3.0 $90

$90.00
$200.00
+1 Deal Score
21,416 Views
Picked on of these up pre-Black Friday. Best price 2T SSD PCle I've found.

Edit: best price I've found.

https://www.microcenter.com/produ...57B75AB9B6
Share
Good deal?
You gave rep to Fubar1764 for this post.
Thank you!
Fubar1764 posted this deal. Say thanks!
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+1
21,416 Views
$90.00
$200.00
About the OP
Send Message
Joined Nov 2020 L2: Beginner
4 Deals Posted
23 Votes Submitted
29 Comments Posted
Questions & Answers BETA
cgigate asked this question on 01-28-2023 at 12:54 PM

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Feb 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 19,095 Posts
8,755 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 09:02 AM.
#1
In store only… shipping not available (at least for me). Thanks for posting, though.
11
>
1
2
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Aug 2017
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,586 Posts
792 Reputation
Pro

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

01-27-2023 at 09:04 AM.
#2
FYI: Endurance: 400 TBW
Read Speed: Up to 2,300MBps
Write Speed: Up to 1,800MBps
9
>
1
>
7
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Mar 2018
L3: Novice
> bubble2 195 Posts
37 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 09:13 AM.
#3
https://www.microcenter.com/site/...ries4.aspx

Combine with this to get it for $75.
10
>
3
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Nov 2017
L3: Novice
> bubble2 181 Posts
42 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 09:19 AM.
#4
Quote from iLikeMild :
FYI: Endurance: 400 TBW
Read Speed: Up to 2,300MBps
Write Speed: Up to 1,800MBps
QLC NAND. Not for primary, definitely for secondary storage, but not quite for any long term archival purposes.
4
>
3
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Oct 2022
New User
> bubble2 8 Posts
10 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 10:07 AM.
#5
One of the reviews mentions that the speed drops to 40MB/s once the slc cache is filled. Can anyone confirm that? I'd rather spend the extra $20-$30 and get the Solidigm P41 plus if the speed drops that much.
8
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Oct 2016
L3: Novice
> bubble2 243 Posts
18 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 12:14 PM.
#6
on BF, its price is $80
still waiting Big Grin
1
1
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Jul 2021
New User
> bubble2 18 Posts
10 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 12:21 PM.
#7
Can we cut this to 2230 ssd for steamdeck?
>
2
1
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Sep 2022
L3: Novice
> bubble2 166 Posts
66 Reputation
Pro
01-27-2023 at 12:33 PM.
#8
Quote from Tslick24 :
One of the reviews mentions that the speed drops to 40MB/s once the slc cache is filled. Can anyone confirm that? I'd rather spend the extra $20-$30 and get the Solidigm P41 plus if the speed drops that much.
I saw a similar review mentioning a substantial drop in speed on both MC and Amazon. Amazon reviewer also mentions overheating, although no temps are mentioned.

Not sure about this one, especially with the low number of reviews. I'd probably lean towards something else. Maybe a Kingston NV2, low-end Crucial, Solidigm P41 etc for a budget drive that barely costs more, especially on sale. The Microcenter SSD was a solid deal last year, but other SSDs have come down further and have better performance.
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Nov 2018
New User
> bubble2 1 Posts
10 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 01:26 PM.
#9
Got one 82 with tax today
1
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Aug 2011
L1: Learner
> bubble2 363 Posts
76 Reputation

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank

01-27-2023 at 03:09 PM.
#10
Quote from AnonymousOctopus :
I saw a similar review mentioning a substantial drop in speed on both MC and Amazon. Amazon reviewer also mentions overheating, although no temps are mentioned.

Not sure about this one, especially with the low number of reviews. I'd probably lean towards something else. Maybe a Kingston NV2, low-end Crucial, Solidigm P41 etc for a budget drive that barely costs more, especially on sale. The Microcenter SSD was a solid deal last year, but other SSDs have come down further and have better performance.
Can confirm... Posted this on Reddit a while back after getting one on the bf sale..I bought one for $55 when it was $80 with a $25 off build coupon. It was probably worth that, but not much more. Terrible buy at $125 and still probably a bad deal at $100.



Just for a little real world data, I did some large transfers on my computer to see what this drive would do. PC specs i5 12400, asrock z690 phantom gaming 4, 32gb ddr4 3600 cl16, and all read/writes were to/from a 980 pro to eliminate any bottlenecks. I'm running W11. Tests were completed back to back, but I wasn't racing and had to wait to pull new files off my nas when you see a new file size used.

​

1st test: The drive started with x free of 1.81TB. large game write, copied destiny 2 (94.1gb) to the drive. It took about a minute. Looked to be about 1.8 gigabytes per second on average.

​

2nd test: The drive started with 1.46TB free of 1.81TB. Large single file write of (76gb). This took 41 seconds (started using the stopwatch on my phone). Again averaging about 1.8GB/s

​

3rd test: The drive started with 1.39TB free of 1.81TB. large game read, copied destiny 2 (94.1gb) back to the 980 pro. This took 1 minute and 42 seconds. The first half copied around 1.3GB/s, the second half of the time was fluctuating from about 400MB/s to 900, going up and down.

​

4- through full tests: The drive started with 1.39TB free of 1.81TB. Large single file (76GB) copy till its full test.

Run 1: Large single file (76GB), Start 1.39TB free, similar speed to the first copy, about the same 41 seconds

Run 2: Large single file (76GB), Start 1.32TB free. This one farking Died after 16%. 10 minutes in I was at 60% and it had completely stalled to 0MB/s multiple times. Task Manager was showing 1-5% utilization on the 980 and this was pinged at 99%. Finally finished around 19 minutes and 20 seconds...

Run 3: Let's try that again... Start 1.25TB Free This test plummeted immediately and I gave up at 3:37 at 15%, fool me once....

Run 4: Any different with multi files? Copied Destiny 2 again, Start 1.25TB free. NOPE, got to 10% in about a minute then hit 0bytes/s and stayed stayed there for a while...I gave up

Run 5: can we still read? Copied the 76gb file in 1:14, averaged maybe 1GB/s

Run 6: Can we write now? 76gb file Start 1.24TB free. No, similar to the last try

Run 7: smaller file? 3.71gb. Start 1.24TB free. Totally fine, took like 3 seconds?

Run 8: Lets go bigger 20.8gb. Start 1.24TB free. Fine until 96% then plummeted to 710KB/s. Ended in 58 seconds.

Run 9: smaller file again 3.71gb. Start 1.22TB free., fine maybe 2 seconds

Run 10: Lets go bigger again 20.8gb. Start 1.241TB free. woof, died at 19% after a few seconds. stayed at 0 bytes/s for like 50 seconds.

Run 11: I don't owe you guys shit, I give up, make of this what you will
19
>
2
>
6
1
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Sep 2022
L3: Novice
> bubble2 166 Posts
66 Reputation
Pro
01-27-2023 at 06:39 PM.
#11
Quote from mrtramplefoot :
Can confirm... Posted this on Reddit a while back after getting one on the bf sale..I bought one for $55 when it was $80 with a $25 off build coupon. It was probably worth that, but not much more. Terrible buy at $125 and still probably a bad deal at $100.



Just for a little real world data, I did some large transfers on my computer to see what this drive would do. PC specs i5 12400, asrock z690 phantom gaming 4, 32gb ddr4 3600 cl16, and all read/writes were to/from a 980 pro to eliminate any bottlenecks. I'm running W11. Tests were completed back to back, but I wasn't racing and had to wait to pull new files off my nas when you see a new file size used.



1st test: The drive started with x free of 1.81TB. large game write, copied destiny 2 (94.1gb) to the drive. It took about a minute. Looked to be about 1.8 gigabytes per second on average.



2nd test: The drive started with 1.46TB free of 1.81TB. Large single file write of (76gb). This took 41 seconds (started using the stopwatch on my phone). Again averaging about 1.8GB/s



3rd test: The drive started with 1.39TB free of 1.81TB. large game read, copied destiny 2 (94.1gb) back to the 980 pro. This took 1 minute and 42 seconds. The first half copied around 1.3GB/s, the second half of the time was fluctuating from about 400MB/s to 900, going up and down.



4- through full tests: The drive started with 1.39TB free of 1.81TB. Large single file (76GB) copy till its full test.

Run 1: Large single file (76GB), Start 1.39TB free, similar speed to the first copy, about the same 41 seconds

Run 2: Large single file (76GB), Start 1.32TB free. This one farking Died after 16%. 10 minutes in I was at 60% and it had completely stalled to 0MB/s multiple times. Task Manager was showing 1-5% utilization on the 980 and this was pinged at 99%. Finally finished around 19 minutes and 20 seconds...

Run 3: Let's try that again... Start 1.25TB Free This test plummeted immediately and I gave up at 3:37 at 15%, fool me once....

Run 4: Any different with multi files? Copied Destiny 2 again, Start 1.25TB free. NOPE, got to 10% in about a minute then hit 0bytes/s and stayed stayed there for a while...I gave up

Run 5: can we still read? Copied the 76gb file in 1:14, averaged maybe 1GB/s

Run 6: Can we write now? 76gb file Start 1.24TB free. No, similar to the last try

Run 7: smaller file? 3.71gb. Start 1.24TB free. Totally fine, took like 3 seconds?

Run 8: Lets go bigger 20.8gb. Start 1.24TB free. Fine until 96% then plummeted to 710KB/s. Ended in 58 seconds.

Run 9: smaller file again 3.71gb. Start 1.22TB free., fine maybe 2 seconds

Run 10: Lets go bigger again 20.8gb. Start 1.241TB free. woof, died at 19% after a few seconds. stayed at 0 bytes/s for like 50 seconds.

Run 11: I don't owe you guys shit, I give up, make of this what you will
Yikes, thanks for adding another data point. I looked at lot of budget and mid-range SSDs for my desktop/laptop last year and don't think I've seen such a reduction in write speeds for a modern NVMe SSD.
2
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Aug 2011
L1: Learner
> bubble2 363 Posts
76 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 06:44 PM.
#12
Quote from AnonymousOctopus :
Yikes, thanks for adding another data point. I looked at lot of budget and mid-range SSDs for my desktop/laptop last year and don't think I've seen such a reduction in write speeds for a modern NVMe SSD.
To be fair, I've just been using it for extra game storage and haven't had any issues using it for that.
7
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Sep 2005
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 693 Posts
102 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 06:51 PM.
#13
Looks great but not wanting to drive there just for it. I want to double my download drive from 2tb to 4tb. I guess I can wait.
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Joined Mar 2019
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 487 Posts
30 Reputation
01-27-2023 at 08:58 PM.
#14
people will literally put anything but "MICROCENTER" on the title huh?
9
Like
>
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Page 1 of 4
Start the ConversationAdd a Comment
 

Trending Stores

Coupons for Popular Stores