expired Posted by SehoneyDP • Feb 1, 2023
Feb 1, 2023 4:43 PM
Item 1 of 1
expired Posted by SehoneyDP • Feb 1, 2023
Feb 1, 2023 4:43 PM
Intel Arc A750 8GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 x16 GPU Video Card + 2 Games & 3 Creative Apps
+ Free Shipping$250
$289
13% offNewegg
Visit NeweggGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Top Comments
Benchmarks/relative performance: https://www.techpowerup
Update: As noted, I'm aware of the driver update that was recently announced. Some people have complained that benchmarks shared put Intel in a bad light and claim the a750/a770 perform much better now but have not provided reputable benchmarks to back up their claims. Few notes here:
- I did not see a single DX9 title as part of Techpowerup's extensive list of benchmarking games. They generally focus on popular, somewhat demanding titles from the last 7 years. Therefore, the DX9 driver improvements alone would not change their ranking at TPU. Also, TPU has updated their relative performance numbers since they have changed since the arc A770's launch review.
- PCWorld just released a small set of updated benchmarks for the arc A770. They have a modest 9 game benchmark that includes a DX9 and DX10 game with the rest being newer DX11/12 titles. Since they didn't provide a summary, I ran the numbers myself. The A770 FPS results comparing launch day to now increased 22.45% overall and 5.95% for DX11/12 games.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoKVTt0
Happy to see DX9 get such a boost and make Intel more competitive, but I'd really rather see improvements for demanding games where 60+ FPS at 1080p can be a struggle with higher settings along with bug fixes.
153 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Also: major nostalgia vibes for GTX 460, that card was a mid-tier masterpiece...
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net...ux92AX.png [futurecdn.net]
That said, I did see the posted propaganda numbers from Intel, had to be the first time I saw Stellaris used as a benchmark... like EVER.
I don't care at all about DLSS or Ray tracing. I'm mostly playing dad games @4K (Pathfinder WOTR, DOSII, Factorio, Dyson Sphere Program, ETC.)
Its should do ok from what I have seen.
The A380 should also work well if you're not gaming at about half the cost.
I'll bet that kid still gets some pretty decent gaming done on that rig. The "old" i5/i7s are such that you could plop in a mid-tier modern card [unicorn, I know] and get quite a bit of utility without having to worry about your progeny effing everything up.
Also: major nostalgia vibes for GTX 460, that card was a mid-tier masterpiece...
Yeah I'm surprised every time a modern game actually runs on it. Everything else in the rig is more current. He got my Ryzen5 1600 when I upgraded to a 3600 and 16GB DDR4. So the GPU is definitely the bottleneck. Anything above a 2060 would be pretty capable. Intel 750 might be the ticket... under $200
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
For 1440p/60 gaming - Radeon RX 6700, it's level Arc 770, but Arc 750 cannot give you even 60 fps.
Buying Arc for unstable/glitch work in 1080p in 2023 year? "Smart" idea.
And I know they made improvements and are making improvements to the driver's but there's a whole circus of driver issues for them to wrangle in. There are no games on Nvidia or AMD that crash to desktop consistently or won't even open or have horrendous frame drops and micro stutter so severe it should be called macro stutter. If AMD or Nvidia have a game that matters to them that doesn't run silky smooth when it's supposed to and thier competitor does, then they are automatically garbage trash even if the issues are very minor or have already been fixed. There are people that get AMD gpu's just for warzone or Nvidia GPU's just for Fortnite. And people that won't even touch AMD gpu's even if the games they play run better on AMD because they had a bad experience once and vice versa to a lesser degree.
Nvidia hasn't even been able to get optimized for warzone and they are the best. And it took AMD months to fix some micro stuttering and frame drop issues in fortnight.
I'm rooting for Intel and want them to do great for the competition but thinking they are gonna deliver in a timely matter and that the games you want to play won't have issues is a lot of faith in Intel.
Outside of a novelty purchase for benchmarking on a secondary computer to see how things develop or die hard support of Intel, I don't really see the justification for buying this.
I don't care at all about DLSS or Ray tracing. I'm mostly playing dad games @4K (Pathfinder WOTR, DOSII, Factorio, Dyson Sphere Program, ETC.)
AMD doesn't suck anymore and thier drivers are good, probably because of the consoles. Almost all of thier cards from this generation have been reviewed pretty favorably.
I have a 3080 and my gf has a 6950xt and we play side by side. Hers is significantly faster by a 20-40 percent margin in almost everything we play at 1440p. But it's an unfair comparison because she has a 7600x with ddr5, with SAM turned on and I have a 9 series i7 with ddr4.
You should get a 3080, it's a great card. Or a 6800xt or a plain 6800 they are also great cards and very competitive without ray tracing.
I don't care at all about DLSS or Ray tracing. I'm mostly playing dad games @4K (Pathfinder WOTR, DOSII, Factorio, Dyson Sphere Program, ETC.)
More likely than making a profit by mining... invent time travel and buy bitcoin in 2011.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.