This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
$359.99 from Samsung[samsung.com] for select EDU/EPP Members (thanks Bams211)
Last Updated by StrawMan86 | Staff on 06-12-2023 at 04:29 PM
QVO uses QLC memory, EVO uses TLC, so "not as good" yeah... depending on you want
Speed: A wash, as it being SATA is going to be the major slowing point, you're not getting 5000MB/s transfer rates with this regardless of brand.
Capacity: the QVO is better because well you get more crammed into that little box, EVO versions of this drive max out at 4TB
Longevity: TLC is superior, but if you're using it mostly as a storage device (e.g. Plex server) then it probably doesn't make any difference either way. Edit: Just looked up the specs on this TBW is 2880TB, so I wouldn't worry about longevity, the warranty covers 3 years or TBW whatever comes first so that aspect should be fine.
Wow, that's a LOT of superfast storage. Does it have a DRAM cache?
Yes, it has 1GB DRAM. Older spec sheet showed it as having 8GB DRAM but I guess it changed.
I don't know that I'd call it superfast storage, at least when it comes to writes. After the ~6-84GB pSLC cache is exhausted, sequential writes drop to ~170 MB/s. At that rate it would take about 13 hours to fill, assuming sequential writes. That's about on par with a hard drive. For an application where it's mostly just used for reads it would probably be fine.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Quote
from tsm37
:
Is QVO not as good as EVO?
QVO uses QLC memory, EVO uses TLC, so "not as good" yeah... depending on you want
Speed: A wash, as it being SATA is going to be the major slowing point, you're not getting 5000MB/s transfer rates with this regardless of brand.
Capacity: the QVO is better because well you get more crammed into that little box, EVO versions of this drive max out at 4TB
Longevity: TLC is superior, but if you're using it mostly as a storage device (e.g. Plex server) then it probably doesn't make any difference either way. Edit: Just looked up the specs on this TBW is 2880TB, so I wouldn't worry about longevity, the warranty covers 3 years or TBW whatever comes first so that aspect should be fine.
Last edited by FormerAstronut June 12, 2023 at 09:30 PM.
paid $300 for the 4tb version a year and a half ago. has been working well. But def slows down with large transfers. took a long time to copy my existing 2tb drive to it when i first got it.
Yes, it has 1GB DRAM. Older spec sheet showed it as having 8GB DRAM but I guess it changed.
I don't know that I'd call it superfast storage, at least when it comes to writes. After the ~6-84GB pSLC cache is exhausted, sequential writes drop to ~170 MB/s. At that rate it would take about 13 hours to fill, assuming sequential writes. That's about on par with a hard drive. For an application where it's mostly just used for reads it would probably be fine.
No It has 8GB DRAM, not sure where your looking but current specs sheets from Samsung still show 8GB.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Quote
from tsm37
:
Is QVO not as good as EVO?
QVO is QLC (Samsung calls it 4-bit MLC) and EVO is TLC (Samsung calls it 3-bit MLC). The EVOs are specs wise rated the same in speed as the QVO but in testing are a little bit faster. The biggest difference is the TBW, the 4TB QVO is rated for 1440TBW and the 4TB EVO is rated for 2400TBW. Unless you write a ton of files either drive will outlive whatever system you put it in.
I'd like to get a laptop and have 8TB of SSD storage. Can most current laptops handle swapping in this 8TB drive? I haven't shopped for a laptop for years.
I'd like to get a laptop and have 8TB of SSD storage. Can most current laptops handle swapping in this 8TB drive? I haven't shopped for a laptop for years.
I don't know about "most" laptops, but you'll want to check the individual model. I have a Dell where the only easily accessible drive interface is a 2280 NVME.
It can technically fit a second SATA drive, but due to having the larger battery the interface is not accessible. If I wanted to use this, I'd have to buy the smaller battery and replace it before I could use the SATA connection.
Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron Stop just stop trying to rip people off. 2TB is down to $62. 62 x 4 = $248. Why on earth would you pay these sky high prices of almost 2X? This is not even a performance SSD just a shitty QLC drive.
BTW this a game drive was down to $330 previously so yes this is definitely a ripoff.
Last edited by Redflyer June 13, 2023 at 04:58 PM.
SSDs are coming down in price so fast it might not be long before I start using them in my Plex server in place of spinners.
I've got a Raspberry Pi set up as a NAS running Open Media Vault, which serves up files to my Plex Server. Using multiple drives set up with UnionFS might be more economical than waiting for an 8TB drive to drop.
No. The QVO uses QLC NAND and some sizes may have less DRAM. QLC is slower and has less endurance. The most noticeable thing will be that writes slow down much more than on the EVO, once the (~6-84GB) pSLC cache is exhausted.
Quote
from FormerAstronut
:
QVO uses QLC memory, EVO uses TLC, so "not as good" yeah... depending on you want
Speed: A wash, as it being SATA is going to be the major slowing point, you're not getting 5000MB/s transfer rates with this regardless of brand.
Capacity: the QVO is better because well you get more crammed into that little box, EVO versions of this drive max out at 4TB
Longevity: TLC is superior, but if you're using it mostly as a storage device (e.g. Plex server) then it probably doesn't make any difference either way. Edit: Just looked up the specs on this TBW is 2880TB, so I wouldn't worry about longevity, the warranty covers 3 years or TBW whatever comes first so that aspect should be fine.
Quote
from ccdavis92
:
QVO is QLC (Samsung calls it 4-bit MLC) and EVO is TLC (Samsung calls it 3-bit MLC). The EVOs are specs wise rated the same in speed as the QVO but in testing are a little bit faster. The biggest difference is the TBW, the 4TB QVO is rated for 1440TBW and the 4TB EVO is rated for 2400TBW. Unless you write a ton of files either drive will outlive whatever system you put it in.
The biggest difference people are going to notice is how much writes slow down once the pSLC cache is exhausted. The QVO drops much further than the EVO and many other drives.
Quote
from Redflyer
:
Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron Stop just stop trying to rip people off. 2TB is down to $62. 62 x 4 = $248. Why on earth would you pay these sky high prices of almost 2X? This is not even a performance SSD just a shitty QLC drive.
This isn't a 2TB drive. High capacity SSDs come with a price premium. Also, this drive has DRAM and is from a reputable company.
Quote
from ccdavis92
:
No It has 8GB DRAM, not sure where your looking but current specs sheets from Samsung still show 8GB.
Follow the link for this deal to Samsung's site, click "see all specs," and it says:
Quote
:
Cache Memory
Samsung 1 GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM
Also, where are you finding the spec sheets on Samsung's current site? I've looked all over and can't seem to find them anywhere. I'm having a terrible time navigating it now. I was able to find them in the past.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I'd like to get a laptop and have 8TB of SSD storage. Can most current laptops handle swapping in this 8TB drive? I haven't shopped for a laptop for years.
Of course, being the same size. No difference in a 8TB or 800 TB future SSD, assuming the OS is capable and size fits. M.2 is a little different in that some were made thicker with dual sides.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
Speed: A wash, as it being SATA is going to be the major slowing point, you're not getting 5000MB/s transfer rates with this regardless of brand.
Capacity: the QVO is better because well you get more crammed into that little box, EVO versions of this drive max out at 4TB
Longevity: TLC is superior, but if you're using it mostly as a storage device (e.g. Plex server) then it probably doesn't make any difference either way. Edit: Just looked up the specs on this TBW is 2880TB, so I wouldn't worry about longevity, the warranty covers 3 years or TBW whatever comes first so that aspect should be fine.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
74 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I don't know that I'd call it superfast storage, at least when it comes to writes. After the ~6-84GB pSLC cache is exhausted, sequential writes drop to ~170 MB/s. At that rate it would take about 13 hours to fill, assuming sequential writes. That's about on par with a hard drive. For an application where it's mostly just used for reads it would probably be fine.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Speed: A wash, as it being SATA is going to be the major slowing point, you're not getting 5000MB/s transfer rates with this regardless of brand.
Capacity: the QVO is better because well you get more crammed into that little box, EVO versions of this drive max out at 4TB
Longevity: TLC is superior, but if you're using it mostly as a storage device (e.g. Plex server) then it probably doesn't make any difference either way. Edit: Just looked up the specs on this TBW is 2880TB, so I wouldn't worry about longevity, the warranty covers 3 years or TBW whatever comes first so that aspect should be fine.
I don't know that I'd call it superfast storage, at least when it comes to writes. After the ~6-84GB pSLC cache is exhausted, sequential writes drop to ~170 MB/s. At that rate it would take about 13 hours to fill, assuming sequential writes. That's about on par with a hard drive. For an application where it's mostly just used for reads it would probably be fine.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
It can technically fit a second SATA drive, but due to having the larger battery the interface is not accessible. If I wanted to use this, I'd have to buy the smaller battery and replace it before I could use the SATA connection.
BTW this a game drive was down to $330 previously so yes this is definitely a ripoff.
Speed: A wash, as it being SATA is going to be the major slowing point, you're not getting 5000MB/s transfer rates with this regardless of brand.
Capacity: the QVO is better because well you get more crammed into that little box, EVO versions of this drive max out at 4TB
Longevity: TLC is superior, but if you're using it mostly as a storage device (e.g. Plex server) then it probably doesn't make any difference either way. Edit: Just looked up the specs on this TBW is 2880TB, so I wouldn't worry about longevity, the warranty covers 3 years or TBW whatever comes first so that aspect should be fine.
Samsung 1 GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!